253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35922888)
1. Quality control validation for a veterinary laboratory network of six Sysmex XT-2000iV hematology analyzers.
Daly S; Graham PA; Freeman KP
Vet Clin Pathol; 2022 Dec; 51(4):565-576. PubMed ID: 35922888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Repeat patient testing-quality control with canine samples shows promise as an alternative to commercial quality control material for a network of four Sysmex XT-2000iV hematology analyzers.
Daly S; Graham PA; Freeman KP
Vet Clin Pathol; 2024 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():39-47. PubMed ID: 37232498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Sysmex XT-2000iV analyzer performance across a network of five veterinary laboratories using a commercially available quality control material.
Daly S; Freeman KP; Graham PA
Vet Clin Pathol; 2021 Dec; 50(4):568-578. PubMed ID: 34859473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Repeat patient testing-quality control compared to commercial quality control material for the Sysmex XT-2000iV hematology analyzer in a multi-site veterinary laboratory.
Daly S; Rishniw M; Graham PA; Freeman KP
Vet Clin Pathol; 2024 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():48-59. PubMed ID: 38356015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of Six Sigma Worksheets for assessment of internal and external failure costs associated with candidate quality control rules for an ADVIA 120 hematology analyzer.
Cian F; Villiers E; Archer J; Pitorri F; Freeman K
Vet Clin Pathol; 2014 Jun; 43(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 24750485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of 3 options for choosing control limits in biochemistry testing.
Manzocchi S; Furman E; Freeman K
Vet Clin Pathol; 2017 Mar; 46(1):120-125. PubMed ID: 28165632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of traditional statistical quality control using commercially available control materials and two patient-based quality control procedures for the ADVIA 120 Hematology System.
Vanyo LC; Freeman KP; Meléndez-Lazo A; Teles M; Cuenca R; Pastor J
Vet Clin Pathol; 2018 Sep; 47(3):368-376. PubMed ID: 30168859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Objective evaluation of analyzer performance based on a retrospective meta-analysis of instrument validation studies: point-of-care hematology analyzers.
Cook AM; Moritz A; Freeman KP; Bauer N
Vet Clin Pathol; 2017 Jun; 46(2):248-261. PubMed ID: 28467597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Total observed error, total allowable error, and QC rules for canine serum and urine cortisol achievable with the Immulite 2000 Xpi cortisol immunoassay.
Korchia J; Freeman KP
J Vet Diagn Invest; 2022 Mar; 34(2):246-257. PubMed ID: 35264042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Repeat patient testing shows promise as a quality control method for veterinary hematology testing.
Flatland B; Freeman KP
Vet Clin Pathol; 2018 Jun; 47(2):252-266. PubMed ID: 29505172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality requirements for veterinary hematology analyzers in small animals-a survey about veterinary experts' requirements and objective evaluation of analyzer performance based on a meta-analysis of method validation studies: bench top hematology analyzer.
Cook AM; Moritz A; Freeman KP; Bauer N
Vet Clin Pathol; 2016 Sep; 45(3):466-76. PubMed ID: 27428874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of the Sysmex XN-V hematology analyzer for canine specimens.
Grebert M; Granat F; Braun JP; Leroy Q; Bourgès-Abella N; Trumel C
Vet Clin Pathol; 2021 Jun; 50(2):184-197. PubMed ID: 34152026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The importance of quality control validation and relationships with total error quality goals and bias in the interpretation of laboratory results.
Freeman K; Klenner-Gastreich S; Korchia J
Vet Clin Pathol; 2024 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():65-74. PubMed ID: 38165023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality control validation, application of sigma metrics, and performance comparison between two biochemistry analyzers in a commercial veterinary laboratory.
Farr AJ; Freeman KP
J Vet Diagn Invest; 2008 Sep; 20(5):536-44. PubMed ID: 18776084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of performance of veterinary in-clinic hematology analyzers.
Rishniw M; Pion PD
Vet Clin Pathol; 2016 Dec; 45(4):604-614. PubMed ID: 27716986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rationale for using insensitive quality control rules for today's hematology analyzers.
Cembrowski GS; Smith B; Tung D
Int J Lab Hematol; 2010 Dec; 32(6 Pt 2):606-15. PubMed ID: 20402824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Sigma metric approach for monitoring the performance of automated analyzers in hematology unit of Alexandria Main University Hospital.
Ahmed El-Neanaey W; Mahmoud AbdEllatif N; Abdel Haleem Abo Elwafa R
Int J Lab Hematol; 2021 Dec; 43(6):1388-1393. PubMed ID: 34275191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality control validation in veterinary laboratories.
Freeman KP; Gruenwaldt J
Vet Clin Pathol; 1999; 28(4):150-155. PubMed ID: 12075513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ASVCP guidelines: quality assurance for point-of-care testing in veterinary medicine.
Flatland B; Freeman KP; Vap LM; Harr KE;
Vet Clin Pathol; 2013 Dec; 42(4):405-23. PubMed ID: 24320778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Repeat patient testing-based quality control shows promise for use in veterinary biochemistry testing.
Flatland B; Freeman KP
Vet Clin Pathol; 2020 Dec; 49(4):590-606. PubMed ID: 33314202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
