These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35924176)

  • 21. Appropriateness of imaging procedure requests: do radiologists agree?
    Kahn CE; Michalski TA; Erickson SJ; Foley WD; Krasnow AZ; Lofgren RP; Quiroz FA; Rand SD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jul; 169(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 9207492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of Royal College of Radiologists' guidelines on referral from general practice. Royal College of Radiologists Working Party.
    BMJ; 1993 Jan; 306(6870):110-1. PubMed ID: 8435606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The role of radiography in primary care patients with low back pain of at least 6 weeks duration: a randomised (unblinded) controlled trial.
    Kendrick D; Fielding K; Bentley E; Miller P; Kerslake R; Pringle M
    Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(30):1-69. PubMed ID: 11701101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. CT and MRI imaging in Sweden: retrospective appropriateness analysis of large referral samples.
    Ståhlbrandt H; Björnfot I; Cederlund T; Almén A
    Insights Imaging; 2023 Aug; 14(1):134. PubMed ID: 37530862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of referrals for lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging from physiotherapists, primary care and secondary care: how should referral pathways be optimised?
    Parmar V; Thompson L; Aniq H
    Physiotherapy; 2015 Mar; 101(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 25125386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of postal distribution of the Royal College of Radiologists' guidelines, together with feedback on radiological referral rates, on X-ray referrals from general practice: a randomized controlled trial.
    Kerry S; Oakeshott P; Dundas D; Williams J
    Fam Pract; 2000 Feb; 17(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 10673488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Observer agreement in the choice of lumbar spine injection for pain management.
    Balza R; Mercaldo SF; Chang CY; Huang AJ; Husseini JS; Kheterpal AB; Simeone FJ; Palmer WE
    Skeletal Radiol; 2021 Dec; 50(12):2495-2501. PubMed ID: 34046738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Variability in diagnostic error rates of 10 MRI centers performing lumbar spine MRI examinations on the same patient within a 3-week period.
    Herzog R; Elgort DR; Flanders AE; Moley PJ
    Spine J; 2017 Apr; 17(4):554-561. PubMed ID: 27867079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. ACR Appropriateness Criteria
    ; Booth TN; Iyer RS; Falcone RA; Hayes LL; Jones JY; Kadom N; Kulkarni AV; Myseros JS; Partap S; Reitman C; Robertson RL; Ryan ME; Saigal G; Soares BP; Tekes-Brady A; Trout AT; Zumberge NA; Coley BD; Palasis S
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2017 May; 14(5S):S13-S24. PubMed ID: 28473069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Algorithm-Based Online Software for Patients' Self-Referral to Breast Clinic as an Alternative to General Practitioner Referral Pathway.
    Rao A; Dhahri AA; Razzaq H; Mokhtari E; Majeed A; Patel A
    Cureus; 2020 Nov; 12(11):e11740. PubMed ID: 33274168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evidence for Policy Making: Clinical Appropriateness Study of Lumbar Spine MRI Prescriptions Using RAND Appropriateness Method.
    Salari H; Ostovar R; Esfandiari A; Keshtkaran A; Akbari Sari A; Yousefi Manesh H; Rakhshan A
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2013 Jun; 1(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 24596832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Quality control of outpatient imaging examinations in North Rhine-Westphalia, Part II].
    Krug B; Boettge M; Reineke T; Coburger S; Zähringer M; Harnischmacher U; Lüngen M; Lauterbach KW; Lehmacher W; Lackner K
    Rofo; 2003 Mar; 175(3):346-60. PubMed ID: 12635011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Improving spine surgical access, appropriateness and efficiency in metropolitan, urban and rural settings.
    Zarrabian M; Bidos A; Fanti C; Young B; Drew B; Puskas D; Rampersaud R
    Can J Surg; 2017 Oct; 60(5):342-348. PubMed ID: 30246685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Belgian multicentre study on lumbar spine imaging: Radiation dose and cost analysis; Evaluation of compliance with recommendations for efficient use of medical imaging.
    De Roo B; Hoste P; Stichelbaut N; Annemans L; Bacher K; Verstraete K
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 Apr; 125():108864. PubMed ID: 32062329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The value of referral information and assessment - a cross sectional study of radiographers' perceptions.
    Chilanga CC; Olerud HM; Lysdahl KB
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Jul; 22(1):893. PubMed ID: 35810310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Intra- and Intersubspecialty Variability in Lumbar Spine MRI Interpretation: A Multireader Study Comparing Musculoskeletal Radiologists and Neuroradiologists.
    Miskin N; Gaviola GC; Huang RY; Kim CJ; Lee TC; Small KM; Wieschhoff GG; Mandell JC
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2020; 49(3):182-187. PubMed ID: 31133459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Magnetic resonance imaging interpretation in patients with symptomatic lumbar spine disc herniations: comparison of clinician and radiologist readings.
    Lurie JD; Doman DM; Spratt KF; Tosteson AN; Weinstein JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(7):701-5. PubMed ID: 19333103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A Day in the Life of MRI: The Variety and Appropriateness of Exams Being Performed in Canada.
    Vanderby S; Badea A; Peña Sánchez JN; Kalra N; Babyn P
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2018 May; 69(2):151-161. PubMed ID: 29198819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement of Morphological Grading for Central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Weber C; Rao V; Gulati S; Kvistad KA; Nygaard ØP; Lønne G
    Global Spine J; 2015 Oct; 5(5):406-10. PubMed ID: 26430595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. ESUR/ESUI consensus statements on multi-parametric MRI for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: quality requirements for image acquisition, interpretation and radiologists' training.
    de Rooij M; Israël B; Tummers M; Ahmed HU; Barrett T; Giganti F; Hamm B; Løgager V; Padhani A; Panebianco V; Puech P; Richenberg J; Rouvière O; Salomon G; Schoots I; Veltman J; Villeirs G; Walz J; Barentsz JO
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5404-5416. PubMed ID: 32424596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.