166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35925748)
21. Learned reward association improves visual working memory.
Gong M; Li S
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):841-56. PubMed ID: 24392741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Shared resources between visual attention and visual working memory are allocated through rhythmic sampling.
Balestrieri E; Ronconi L; Melcher D
Eur J Neurosci; 2022 Jun; 55(11-12):3040-3053. PubMed ID: 33942394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Saccadic eye movements smear spatial working memory.
Peterson MS; Kelly SP; Blumberg EJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Feb; 45(2):255-263. PubMed ID: 30589355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Searching while loaded: Visual working memory does not interfere with hybrid search efficiency but hybrid search uses working memory capacity.
Drew T; Boettcher SE; Wolfe JM
Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Feb; 23(1):201-12. PubMed ID: 26055755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Can you have multiple attentional templates? Large-scale replications of Van Moorselaar, Theeuwes, and Olivers (2014) and Hollingworth and Beck (2016).
Frătescu M; Van Moorselaar D; Mathôt S
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2700-2709. PubMed ID: 31309532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Visual working memory simultaneously guides facilitation and inhibition during visual search.
Dube B; Basciano A; Emrich SM; Al-Aidroos N
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1232-44. PubMed ID: 27055458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Attentional guidance by working memory differs by paradigm: an individual-differences approach.
Dowd EW; Kiyonaga A; Egner T; Mitroff SR
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):704-12. PubMed ID: 25737257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. More target features in visual working memory leads to poorer search guidance: evidence from contralateral delay activity.
Schmidt J; MacNamara A; Proudfit GH; Zelinsky GJ
J Vis; 2014 Mar; 14(3):8. PubMed ID: 24599946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Pop-out and pop-in: Visual working memory advantages for unique items.
Rajsic J; Sun SZ; Huxtable L; Pratt J; Ferber S
Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1787-1793. PubMed ID: 27025501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effects of divided attention and of stimulus repetition on item-item binding in verbal working memory.
Peterson DJ; Decker R; Naveh-Benjamin M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Nov; 45(11):1955-1969. PubMed ID: 30869953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Visual working memory representations bias attention more when they are the target of an action plan.
Trentin C; Slagter HA; Olivers CNL
Cognition; 2023 Jan; 230():105274. PubMed ID: 36113256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Selective maintenance in visual working memory does not require sustained visual attention.
Hollingworth A; Maxcey-Richard AM
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Aug; 39(4):1047-58. PubMed ID: 23067118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Visual Working Memory Guides Spatial Attention: Evidence from alpha oscillations and sustained potentials.
Li D; Zhao C; Guo J; Kong Y; Li H; Du B; Ding Y; Song Y
Neuropsychologia; 2021 Jan; 151():107719. PubMed ID: 33309675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Strategic inhibition of distractors with visual working memory contents after involuntary attention capture.
Lu J; Tian L; Zhang J; Wang J; Ye C; Liu Q
Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):16314. PubMed ID: 29176675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Inhibition continues to guide search under concurrent visual working memory load.
Hamblin-Frohman Z; Becker SI
J Vis; 2022 Feb; 22(2):8. PubMed ID: 35156992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The role of attention in item-item binding in visual working memory.
Peterson DJ; Naveh-Benjamin M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1403-1414. PubMed ID: 28263619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. When shorter delays lead to worse memories: Task disruption makes visual working memory temporarily vulnerable to test interference.
Wang B; Theeuwes J; Olivers CNL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):722-733. PubMed ID: 29094991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The boundary conditions of priming of visual search: from passive viewing through task-relevant working memory load.
Kristjánsson A; Saevarsson S; Driver J
Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Jun; 20(3):514-21. PubMed ID: 23325704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Task-irrelevant memories rapidly gain attentional control with learning.
Gunseli E; Olivers CNL; Meeter M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Mar; 42(3):354-362. PubMed ID: 26436527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Perceptual distraction causes visual memory encoding intrusions.
Dube B; Golomb JD
Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Oct; 28(5):1592-1600. PubMed ID: 34027621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
