141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35926084)
21. Masked Speech Recognition and Reading Ability in School-Age Children: Is There a Relationship?
Miller G; Lewis B; Benchek P; Buss E; Calandruccio L
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 61(3):776-788. PubMed ID: 29507949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Contribution of Stimulus Variability to Word Recognition in Noise Versus Two-Talker Speech for School-Age Children and Adults.
Buss E; Calandruccio L; Oleson J; Leibold LJ
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):313-322. PubMed ID: 32881723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Spatial Release From Informational and Energetic Masking in Bimodal and Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.
D'Onofrio K; Richards V; Gifford R
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Nov; 63(11):3816-3833. PubMed ID: 33049147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Temporal fine structure influences voicing confusions for consonant identification in multi-talker babble.
Viswanathan V; Shinn-Cunningham BG; Heinz MG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Oct; 150(4):2664. PubMed ID: 34717498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Measuring effectiveness of semantic cues in degraded English sentences in non-native listeners.
Shi LF
Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 24003982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The effectiveness of clear speech as a masker.
Calandruccio L; Van Engen K; Dhar S; Bradlow AR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 53(6):1458-71. PubMed ID: 20689024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
Phatak SA; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Informational Masking and Listening Effort in Speech Recognition in Noise: The Role of Working Memory Capacity and Inhibitory Control in Older Adults With and Without Hearing Impairment.
Stenbäck V; Marsja E; Hällgren M; Lyxell B; Larsby B
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Nov; 65(11):4417-4428. PubMed ID: 36283680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech for native and nonnative english speakers.
Calandruccio L; Bradlow AR; Dhar S
J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Apr; 25(4):355-66. PubMed ID: 25126683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
Summers V; Molis MR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Predicting word-recognition performance in noise by young listeners with normal hearing using acoustic, phonetic, and lexical variables.
McArdle R; Wilson RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):507-18. PubMed ID: 19253783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. English vowel identification in long-term speech-shaped noise and multi-talker babble for English and Chinese listeners.
Mi L; Tao S; Wang W; Dong Q; Jin SH; Liu C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL391-7. PubMed ID: 23656099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Contribution of Age, Working Memory Capacity, and Inhibitory Control on Speech Recognition in Noise in Young and Older Adult Listeners.
Stenbäck V; Marsja E; Hällgren M; Lyxell B; Larsby B
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Nov; 64(11):4513-4523. PubMed ID: 34550765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Neural encoding and perception of speech signals in informational masking.
Bennett KO; Billings CJ; Molis MR; Leek MR
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 22367094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cross-modal Informational Masking of Lipreading by Babble.
Myerson J; Spehar B; Tye-Murray N; Van Engen K; Hale S; Sommers MS
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jan; 78(1):346-54. PubMed ID: 26474981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The influence of informational masking in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
Westermann A; Buchholz JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):584-93. PubMed ID: 26328677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Recognition of accented and unaccented speech in different maskers by younger and older listeners.
Gordon-Salant S; Yeni-Komshian GH; Fitzgibbons PJ; Cohen JI; Waldroup C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):618-27. PubMed ID: 23862836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Informational masking of speech produced by speech-like sounds without linguistic content.
Chen J; Li H; Li L; Wu X; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):2914-26. PubMed ID: 22501069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effect of nearby maskers on speech intelligibility in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
Westermann A; Buchholz JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):2214. PubMed ID: 28372143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effectiveness of Two-Talker Maskers That Differ in Talker Congruity and Perceptual Similarity to the Target Speech.
Calandruccio L; Buss E; Bowdrie K
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517709385. PubMed ID: 29169315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
