232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35926127)
1. Fossil-Fuel Options for Power Sector Net-Zero Emissions with Sequestration Tax Credits.
Anderson JJ; Rode DC; Zhai H; Fischbeck PS
Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Aug; 56(16):11162-11171. PubMed ID: 35926127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost Analysis of Carbon Capture and Sequestration from U.S. Natural Gas-Fired Power Plants.
Psarras P; He J; Pilorgé H; McQueen N; Jensen-Fellows A; Kian K; Wilcox J
Environ Sci Technol; 2020 May; 54(10):6272-6280. PubMed ID: 32329614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Policy-Driven Potential for Deploying Carbon Capture and Sequestration in a Fossil-Rich Power Sector.
Dindi A; Coddington K; Garofalo JF; Wu W; Zhai H
Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Jul; 56(14):9872-9881. PubMed ID: 35785993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Strategic Carbon Dioxide Infrastructure to Achieve a Low-Carbon Power Sector in the Midwestern and South-Central United States.
Tao Y; Edwards RWJ; Mauzerall DL; Celia MA
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Nov; 55(22):15013-15024. PubMed ID: 34714051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The environmental and economic sustainability of carbon capture and storage.
Hardisty PE; Sivapalan M; Brooks P
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2011 May; 8(5):1460-77. PubMed ID: 21655130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Options for near-term phaseout of CO(2) emissions from coal use in the United States.
Kharecha PA; Kutscher CF; Hansen JE; Mazria E
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jun; 44(11):4050-62. PubMed ID: 20429611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An optimization model for carbon capture & storage/utilization vs. carbon trading: A case study of fossil-fired power plants in Turkey.
Ağralı S; Üçtuğ FG; Türkmen BA
J Environ Manage; 2018 Jun; 215():305-315. PubMed ID: 29574208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Separation and capture of CO2 from large stationary sources and sequestration in geological formations--coalbeds and deep saline aquifers.
White CM; Strazisar BR; Granite EJ; Hoffman JS; Pennline HW;
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2003 Jun; 53(6):645-715. PubMed ID: 12828330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Decarbonizing the Coal-Fired Power Sector in China via Carbon Capture, Geological Utilization, and Storage Technology.
Wei N; Jiao Z; Ellett K; Ku AY; Liu S; Middleton R; Li X
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Oct; 55(19):13164-13173. PubMed ID: 34549588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of the US EPA's determination of the role for CO2 capture and storage in new fossil fuel-fired power plants.
Clark VR; Herzog HJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 48(14):7723-9. PubMed ID: 24960207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost Analysis of Carbon Capture and Sequestration of Process Emissions from the U.S. Industrial Sector.
Pilorgé H; McQueen N; Maynard D; Psarras P; He J; Rufael T; Wilcox J
Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Jun; 54(12):7524-7532. PubMed ID: 32432460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Techno-Economic Assessment of Hybrid Cooling Systems for Coal- and Natural-Gas-Fired Power Plants with and without Carbon Capture and Storage.
Zhai H; Rubin ES
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Apr; 50(7):4127-34. PubMed ID: 26967583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of natural gas in reaching net-zero emissions in the electric sector.
Bistline JET; Young DT
Nat Commun; 2022 Aug; 13(1):4743. PubMed ID: 35961986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Opportunities for Decarbonizing Existing U.S. Coal-Fired Power Plants via CO2 Capture, Utilization and Storage.
Zhai H; Ou Y; Rubin ES
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(13):7571-9. PubMed ID: 26023722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of multimode gas-fired combined-cycle chemical-looping combustion-based power plant layouts.
Jayadevappa BR
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Aug; 29(36):54967-54987. PubMed ID: 35307797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Deep CCS: Moving Beyond 90% Carbon Dioxide Capture.
Dods MN; Kim EJ; Long JR; Weston SC
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Jul; 55(13):8524-8534. PubMed ID: 34157836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Viability of Carbon Capture and Sequestration Retrofits for Existing Coal-Fired Power Plants under an Emission Trading Scheme.
Talati S; Zhai H; Morgan MG
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Dec; 50(23):12567-12574. PubMed ID: 27792308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are renewables portfolio standards cost-effective emission abatement policy?
Dobesova K; Apt J; Lave LB
Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Nov; 39(22):8578-83. PubMed ID: 16323750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Near-term deployment of carbon capture and sequestration from biorefineries in the United States.
Sanchez DL; Johnson N; McCoy ST; Turner PA; Mach KJ
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(19):4875-4880. PubMed ID: 29686063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Porous materials for carbon dioxide separations.
Siegelman RL; Kim EJ; Long JR
Nat Mater; 2021 Aug; 20(8):1060-1072. PubMed ID: 34321657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
