145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35926740)
1. Man-made natural and regenerated cellulosic fibres greatly outnumber microplastic fibres in the atmosphere.
Finnegan AMD; Süsserott R; Gabbott SE; Gouramanis C
Environ Pollut; 2022 Oct; 310():119808. PubMed ID: 35926740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Examining the release of synthetic microfibres to the environment via two major pathways: Atmospheric deposition and treated wastewater effluent.
Napper IE; Parker-Jurd FNF; Wright SL; Thompson RC
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jan; 857(Pt 1):159317. PubMed ID: 36220472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sampling microfibres at the sea surface: The effects of mesh size, sample volume and water depth.
Ryan PG; Suaria G; Perold V; Pierucci A; Bornman TG; Aliani S
Environ Pollut; 2020 Mar; 258():113413. PubMed ID: 31862120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microplastic study reveals the presence of natural and synthetic fibres in the diet of King Penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus) foraging from South Georgia.
Le Guen C; Suaria G; Sherley RB; Ryan PG; Aliani S; Boehme L; Brierley AS
Environ Int; 2020 Jan; 134():105303. PubMed ID: 31726359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The contamination of inland waters by microplastic fibres under different anthropogenic pressure: Preliminary study in Central Europe (Poland).
Kaliszewicz A; Winczek M; Karaban K; Kurzydłowski D; Górska M; Koselak W; Romanowski J
Waste Manag Res; 2020 Nov; 38(11):1231-1238. PubMed ID: 32659207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The possible routes of microplastics uptake in sea cucumber Holothuria cinerascens (Brandt, 1835).
Iwalaye OA; Moodley GK; Robertson-Andersson DV
Environ Pollut; 2020 Sep; 264():114644. PubMed ID: 32559857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microplastics and other anthropogenic fibres in large apex shark species: Abundance, characteristics, and recommendations for future research.
Lu HC; Smith JL; Ziajahromi S; Leusch FDL
Chemosphere; 2024 Feb; 349():140957. PubMed ID: 38128742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Anthropogenic microfibres flux in an Antarctic coastal ecosystem: The tip of an iceberg?
Alurralde G; Isla E; Fuentes V; Olariaga A; Maggioni T; Rimondino G; Tatián M
Mar Pollut Bull; 2022 Feb; 175():113388. PubMed ID: 35180508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The contribution of washing processes of synthetic clothes to microplastic pollution.
De Falco F; Di Pace E; Cocca M; Avella M
Sci Rep; 2019 Apr; 9(1):6633. PubMed ID: 31036862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microplastic abundance in the Thames River during the New Year period.
Devereux R; Westhead EK; Jayaratne R; Newport D
Mar Pollut Bull; 2022 Apr; 177():113534. PubMed ID: 35303637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Atmospheric deposition of anthropogenic particles and microplastics in south-central Ontario, Canada.
Welsh B; Aherne J; Paterson AM; Yao H; McConnell C
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Aug; 835():155426. PubMed ID: 35469860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The imprint of microfibres in southern European deep seas.
Sanchez-Vidal A; Thompson RC; Canals M; de Haan WP
PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207033. PubMed ID: 30395638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are anthropogenic fibres a real problem for red mullets (Mullus barbatus) from the NW Mediterranean?
Rodríguez-Romeu O; Constenla M; Carrassón M; Campoy-Quiles M; Soler-Membrives A
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Sep; 733():139336. PubMed ID: 32422462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using a forensic science approach to minimize environmental contamination and to identify microfibres in marine sediments.
Woodall LC; Gwinnett C; Packer M; Thompson RC; Robinson LF; Paterson GL
Mar Pollut Bull; 2015 Jun; 95(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 25936572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microfibres from apparel and home textiles: Prospects for including microplastics in environmental sustainability assessment.
Henry B; Laitala K; Klepp IG
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 652():483-494. PubMed ID: 30368178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection and characterisation of microplastics and microfibres in fishmeal and soybean meal.
Walkinshaw C; Tolhurst TJ; Lindeque PK; Thompson R; Cole M
Mar Pollut Bull; 2022 Dec; 185(Pt A):114189. PubMed ID: 36257247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Atmospheric transport and deposition of microplastics in a subtropical urban environment.
Huang Y; He T; Yan M; Yang L; Gong H; Wang W; Qing X; Wang J
J Hazard Mater; 2021 Aug; 416():126168. PubMed ID: 34492944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. First comparison of sampler surface areas for atmospheric microfibre deposition.
Finnegan AMD; Süsserott R; Koh LH; Teo WB; Gabbott SE; Gouramanis C
Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Jun; 194(8):541. PubMed ID: 35768630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of anthropogenic fibres in marine organisms: Knowledge gaps and methodological issues.
Concato M; Panti C; Baini M; Galli M; Giani D; Fossi MC
Mar Pollut Bull; 2023 Jun; 191():114949. PubMed ID: 37119585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microplastic ingestion ubiquitous in marine turtles.
Duncan EM; Broderick AC; Fuller WJ; Galloway TS; Godfrey MH; Hamann M; Limpus CJ; Lindeque PK; Mayes AG; Omeyer LCM; Santillo D; Snape RTE; Godley BJ
Glob Chang Biol; 2019 Feb; 25(2):744-752. PubMed ID: 30513551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
