These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35927492)
1. What makes an undercover science sleuth tick? Fake-paper detective speaks out. Else H Nature; 2022 Aug; 608(7923):463. PubMed ID: 35927492 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes. Fox MF J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A Method for Improving the Integrity of Peer Review. Dadkhah M; Kahani M; Borchardt G Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Oct; 24(5):1603-1610. PubMed ID: 28812275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Redundant publication in biomedical sciences: scientific misconduct or necessity? Jefferson T Sci Eng Ethics; 1998 Apr; 4(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 11657769 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Lack of Improvement in Scientific Integrity: An Analysis of WoS Retractions by Chinese Researchers (1997-2016). Lei L; Zhang Y Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Oct; 24(5):1409-1420. PubMed ID: 28889329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Criminal liability for misconduct in scientific research. Kuzma SM Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1992; 25(2):357-421. PubMed ID: 11651584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Identity Theft in the Academic World Leads to Junk Science. Dadkhah M; Lagzian M; Borchardt G Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Feb; 24(1):287-290. PubMed ID: 28074375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An introduction to research ethics. Friedman PJ Sci Eng Ethics; 1996 Oct; 2(4):443-56. PubMed ID: 11657731 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. China's clampdown on fake-paper factories picks up speed. Else H Nature; 2021 Oct; 598(7879):19-20. PubMed ID: 34594025 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. What do we know about fraud and other forms of intellectual dishonesty in science? Part 2: why does fraud happen and what are its effects? Garfield E Curr Contents Clin Med; 1987 Apr; 15(15):3-10. PubMed ID: 11649943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Paper-mill detector put to the test in push to stamp out fake science. Else H Nature; 2022 Dec; 612(7940):386-387. PubMed ID: 36460917 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fraud in research: Congress asks why. Nature; 1981 Apr; 290(5806):437-8. PubMed ID: 11643638 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Fraud in science: a plea for a new culture in research. Müller MJ; Landsberg B; Ried J Int J Obes (Lond); 2014 Apr; 38(4):572-6. PubMed ID: 24709671 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Linguistic traces of a scientific fraud: the case of Diederik Stapel. Markowitz DM; Hancock JT PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e105937. PubMed ID: 25153333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fraud and deceit in science. Schraffordt Koops SE Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Jul; 23(7):809-10. PubMed ID: 22290192 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cheating in science and publishing. Altman LK CBE Views; 1981; 4(4):19-25. PubMed ID: 11649550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The process of publication. Koshland DE Science; 1989 Aug; 245(4918):573. PubMed ID: 11644383 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Truth and trustworthiness in research. Whitbeck C Sci Eng Ethics; 1995 Oct; 1(4):403-16. PubMed ID: 11657785 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. How big is science's fake-paper problem? Van Noorden R Nature; 2023 Nov; 623(7987):466-467. PubMed ID: 37949983 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]