255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35928269)
1. Nivolumab Versus Sorafenib as First-Line Therapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Li Y; Liang X; Li H; Yang T; Guo S; Chen X
Front Pharmacol; 2022; 13():906956. PubMed ID: 35928269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab versus sorafenib as first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Shu Y; Tang Y; Ding Y; Zhang Q
Int Immunopharmacol; 2023 Sep; 122():110543. PubMed ID: 37406395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus the EXTREME regimen in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Ye D; Liang X; Chen X; Li Y
Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):6807. PubMed ID: 38514766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus nivolumab as first-line treatment for advanced or unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
Li Y; Liang X; Li H; Chen X
Cancer; 2022 Nov; 128(22):3995-4003. PubMed ID: 36111952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line serplulimab combined with chemotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.
Liang X; Chen X; Li H; Li Y
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1156427. PubMed ID: 37727602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab vs Sorafenib as First-Line Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Su D; Wu B; Shi L
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Feb; 4(2):e210037. PubMed ID: 33625508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab vs Sorafenib for Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Zhang X; Wang J; Shi J; Jia X; Dang S; Wang W
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Apr; 4(4):e214846. PubMed ID: 33825837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nivolumab vs Pembrolizumab for Treatment of US Patients With Platinum-Refractory Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Network Meta-analysis and Cost-effectiveness Analysis.
Pei R; Shi Y; Lv S; Dai T; Zhang F; Liu S; Wu B
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 May; 4(5):e218065. PubMed ID: 33956130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of cemiplimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Liang X; Chen X; Li H; Li Y
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1113374. PubMed ID: 37182130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of sacituzumab govitecan in hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer.
Shi D; Li Y; Liang X; Chen L
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1162360. PubMed ID: 37251935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pembrolizumab vs cemiplimab for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with PD-L1 expression levels of at least 50%: A network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Li Y; Liang X; Yang T; Guo S; Chen X
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():878054. PubMed ID: 36226060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sugemalimab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
Liang X; Chen X; Li H; Liu X; Li Y
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1054405. PubMed ID: 36923040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated in the United States.
McCrea C; Johal S; Yang S; Doan J
Exp Hematol Oncol; 2018; 7():4. PubMed ID: 29456880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of sintilimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Liu L; Wang L; Chen L; Ding Y; Zhang Q; Shu Y
Front Immunol; 2023; 14():1092385. PubMed ID: 36756110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
Wan X; Zeng X; Peng L; Peng Y; Liu Q; Yi L; Luo X; Deng Q; Tan C
Front Pharmacol; 2021; 12():580459. PubMed ID: 34512315
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-Effectiveness and Net Monetary Benefit of Olaparib Maintenance Therapy Versus No Maintenance Therapy After First-line Platinum-based Chemotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Advanced BRCA1/2-mutated Ovarian Cancer in the Italian National Health Service.
Armeni P; Borsoi L; Fornaro G; Jommi C; Colombo N; Costa F
Clin Ther; 2020 Jul; 42(7):1192-1209.e12. PubMed ID: 32591103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab combination therapy in the first-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma.
Liu S; Dou L; Wang K; Shi Z; Wang R; Zhu X; Song Z; Li S
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():899966. PubMed ID: 35936686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab or chemotherapy
Cao X; Cai H; Li N; Zheng B; Zheng Z; Liu M
Ther Adv Med Oncol; 2022; 14():17588359221122733. PubMed ID: 36147862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy is more cost-effective than chemotherapy alone as first-line therapy for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.
Liang X; Chen X; Li H; Li Y
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1009920. PubMed ID: 36794070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus platinum-doublet chemotherapy for first-line treatment of stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer in the United States.
Berling M; Chaudhary MA; Yuan Y; Varol N; Dale P; Testa E; Klint J; Lee A; Lubinga SJ; Penrod JR
J Med Econ; 2022; 25(1):703-711. PubMed ID: 35659172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
