231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35929449)
1. Leadless or Conventional Transvenous Ventricular Permanent Pacemakers: A Nationwide Matched Control Study.
Bodin A; Clementy N; Bisson A; Pierre B; Herbert J; Babuty D; Fauchier L
J Am Heart Assoc; 2022 Aug; 11(16):e025339. PubMed ID: 35929449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of in-hospital outcomes and complications of leadless pacemaker and traditional transvenous pacemaker implantation.
Alhuarrat MAD; Kharawala A; Renjithlal S; Magdi Eid M; Varrias D; Mohammed M; Grushko M; Di Biase L
Europace; 2023 Aug; 25(9):. PubMed ID: 37712644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contemporaneous Comparison of Outcomes Among Patients Implanted With a Leadless vs Transvenous Single-Chamber Ventricular Pacemaker.
Piccini JP; El-Chami M; Wherry K; Crossley GH; Kowal RC; Stromberg K; Longacre C; Hinnenthal J; Bockstedt L
JAMA Cardiol; 2021 Oct; 6(10):1187-1195. PubMed ID: 34319383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two-year outcomes of leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacemaker in high-risk subgroups.
Boveda S; Higuera L; Longacre C; Wolff C; Wherry K; Stromberg K; El-Chami MF
Europace; 2023 Mar; 25(3):1041-1050. PubMed ID: 36757859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up.
El-Chami MF; Bockstedt L; Longacre C; Higuera L; Stromberg K; Crossley G; Kowal RC; Piccini JP
Eur Heart J; 2022 Mar; 43(12):1207-1215. PubMed ID: 34788416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical Outcomes of Non-Atrial Fibrillation Bradyarrhythmias Treated With a Ventricular Demand Leadless Pacemaker Compared With an Atrioventricular Synchronous Transvenous Pacemaker - A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
Sasaki K; Togashi D; Nakajima I; Suchi T; Nakayama Y; Harada T; Akashi YJ
Circ J; 2022 Jul; 86(8):1283-1291. PubMed ID: 35095057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Leadless versus transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacemakers: 3 year follow-up of the Micra CED study.
Crossley GH; Piccini JP; Longacre C; Higuera L; Stromberg K; El-Chami MF
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2023 Apr; 34(4):1015-1023. PubMed ID: 36807378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Leadless pacemaker versus transvenous single-chamber pacemaker therapy: A propensity score-matched analysis.
Tjong FVY; Knops RE; Udo EO; Brouwer TF; Dukkipati SR; Koruth JS; Petru J; Sediva L; van Hemel NM; Neuzil P; Reddy VY
Heart Rhythm; 2018 Sep; 15(9):1387-1393. PubMed ID: 29709576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Permanent Leadless Cardiac Pacemaker Therapy: A Comprehensive Review.
Tjong FV; Reddy VY
Circulation; 2017 Apr; 135(15):1458-1470. PubMed ID: 28396380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes of leadless pacemaker implantation following transvenous lead extraction in high-volume referral centers: Real-world data from a large international registry.
Mitacchione G; Schiavone M; Gasperetti A; Arabia G; Breitenstein A; Cerini M; Palmisano P; Montemerlo E; Ziacchi M; Gulletta S; Salghetti F; Russo G; Monaco C; Mazzone P; Hofer D; Tundo F; Rovaris G; Russo AD; Biffi M; Pisanò ECL; Chierchia GB; Della Bella P; de Asmundis C; Saguner AM; Tondo C; Forleo GB; Curnis A
Heart Rhythm; 2023 Mar; 20(3):395-404. PubMed ID: 36496135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Leadless Cardiac Pacemakers: Pacing Paradigm Change.
Neuzil P; Reddy VY
Curr Cardiol Rep; 2015 Aug; 17(8):68. PubMed ID: 26233700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative study of acute and mid-term complications with leadless and transvenous cardiac pacemakers.
Cantillon DJ; Dukkipati SR; Ip JH; Exner DV; Niazi IK; Banker RS; Rashtian M; Plunkitt K; Tomassoni GF; Nabutovsky Y; Davis KJ; Reddy VY
Heart Rhythm; 2018 Jul; 15(7):1023-1030. PubMed ID: 29957188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Leadless Pacemakers: State of the Art and Future Perspectives.
Della Rocca DG; Gianni C; Di Biase L; Natale A; Al-Ahmad A
Card Electrophysiol Clin; 2018 Mar; 10(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 29428139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Leadless Cardiac Pacemakers: Current status of a modern approach in pacing.
Sideris S; Archontakis S; Dilaveris P; Gatzoulis KA; Trachanas K; Sotiropoulos I; Arsenos P; Tousoulis D; Kallikazaros I
Hellenic J Cardiol; 2017; 58(6):403-410. PubMed ID: 28529181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Leadless pacemakers in critically ill patients requiring prolonged cardiac pacing: A multicenter international study.
Clementy N; Coelho R; Veltmann C; Marijon E; Tolosana J; Galand V; Ploux S; Eschalier R; Simeon E; Blessberger H; Mueller-Leisse J; Pujol-Lopez M; Martins R; Ritter P; Steinwender C; Babuty D
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2021 Sep; 32(9):2522-2527. PubMed ID: 34270153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Indications for leadless VVI and VDD pacing in clinical practice].
Giaccardi M; Nesti M; Segreti L; Rossi A; Porcedda G; Bongiorni MG
G Ital Cardiol (Rome); 2022 Jun; 23(6):454-460. PubMed ID: 35674036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The leadless pacemaker system: present applications and future perspectives].
Mattsson G; Magnusson P
Lakartidningen; 2018 Aug; 115():. PubMed ID: 30106456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Leadless cardiac pacing: Results from a large single-centre experience.
Lenormand T; Abou Khalil K; Bodin A; Babuty D; Bisson A; Clementy N
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2023; 116(6-7):316-323. PubMed ID: 37236828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes of primary leadless pacemaker implantation: A systematic review.
Noor TA; Rana MOR; Kumari S; Umer B; Malik J; Ashraf A; Faraz M; Hussain T; Awais M; Mehmoodi A; Hayat A
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol; 2023 Nov; 28(6):e13084. PubMed ID: 37606307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Leadless Pacemakers: State of the Art and Selection of the Ideal Candidate.
Blank EA; El-Chami MF; Wenger NK
Curr Cardiol Rev; 2023; 19(5):43-50. PubMed ID: 36999695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
