These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3592967)

  • 1. Experimental evaluation of staple lines in gastric surgery.
    Bluett MK; Healy DA; Kalemeris GC; O'Leary JP
    Arch Surg; 1987 Jul; 122(7):772-6. PubMed ID: 3592967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Collagen content, histology, and tensile strength: determinants of wound repair in various gastric stapling devices in a canine gastric partition model.
    Harris PL; Freedman BE; Bland KI; Miller GJ; Seeger JM; Woodward ER
    J Surg Res; 1987 Apr; 42(4):411-7. PubMed ID: 3573766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of automatic staplers in small bowel anastomoses.
    Bluett MK; Healy DA; Kalemeris GC; O'Leary JP
    South Med J; 1986 Jun; 79(6):712-6. PubMed ID: 3715535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The healing and tensile strength of the gastroplasty staple line. An experimental study.
    Okudaira Y; Yang Y; Kholoussy AM; Matsumoto T
    Am Surg; 1984 Oct; 50(10):564-8. PubMed ID: 6486574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of a novel stapler performance for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.
    Salyer C; Spuzzillo A; Wakefield D; Gomaa D; Thompson J; Goodman M
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jul; 35(7):4016-4021. PubMed ID: 32749610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Technical characteristics can make the difference in a surgical linear stapler. Or not?
    Giaccaglia V; Antonelli MS; Addario Chieco P; Cocorullo G; Cavallini M; Gulotta G
    J Surg Res; 2015 Jul; 197(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 25918006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ex vivo pneumostasis evaluation of a variable-height staple design.
    Contini E; Godek ML; Whiffen JM; Bronson DG
    Innovations (Phila); 2013; 8(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 24145973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of automated staple sizes on gastric layer incorporation and intraluminal pressure for partial gastrectomy closure in an ex vivo canine model.
    Blumenthal M; Bertran J; Regier P; Cole J; Maxwell EA
    Vet Med Sci; 2023 Nov; 9(6):2586-2593. PubMed ID: 37817443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving the side-to-side stapled anastomosis: comparison of staplers for robust crotch formation.
    Kimura M; Kuwabara Y; Taniwaki S; Mitsui A; Shibata Y; Ueno S
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2018 Jan; 14(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 29108894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intersecting staple lines in intestinal anastomoses.
    Ravitch MM
    Surgery; 1985 Jan; 97(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 3880937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In-continuity gastrointestinal stapling.
    Mulholland MW; Magallanes F; Quigley TM; Delaney JP
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1983 Sep; 26(9):586-9. PubMed ID: 6347569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Totally intracorporeal delta-shaped B-I anastomosis following laparoscopic distal gastrectomy using the Tri-Staple™ reloads on the manual Ultra handle: a prospective cohort study with historical controls.
    Man-I M; Suda K; Kikuchi K; Tanaka T; Furuta S; Nakauchi M; Ishikawa K; Ishida Y; Uyama I
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Nov; 29(11):3304-12. PubMed ID: 25732753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lactomer copolymer absorbable staples in gastrointestinal surgery.
    Hirashima T; Eto T; DenBesten L
    Am J Surg; 1985 Sep; 150(3):381-5. PubMed ID: 4037202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pressure tolerance of newly constructed staple lines in sleeve gastrectomy and duodenal switch.
    Causey MW; Fitzpatrick E; Carter P
    Am J Surg; 2013 May; 205(5):571-4; discussion 574-5. PubMed ID: 23592165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Increasing the efficacy of gastric operations for the control of morbid obesity.
    Printen KJ; Platz C; Tobin H; Lewis JW
    Am Surg; 1982 Jul; 48(7):309-15. PubMed ID: 7091918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimental study of singly placed staples for an everted intestinal anastomosis.
    Okudaira Y; Kholoussy AM; Sharf H; Yang Y; Matsumoto T
    Am J Surg; 1984 Feb; 147(2):234-6. PubMed ID: 6696198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Profiling surgical staplers: effect of staple height, buttress, and overlap on staple line failure.
    Mery CM; Shafi BM; Binyamin G; Morton JM; Gertner M
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2008; 4(3):416-22. PubMed ID: 18226977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Long-term animal experiment analysis of the use of resorbable staple sutures in partial gastrectomy].
    Walgenbach S; Lang U; Junginger T
    Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1994; 379(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 8145617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experimental evaluation of staple lines in gastric surgery.
    Owen ER
    Arch Surg; 1988 Jul; 123(7):912. PubMed ID: 3382359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Micro-CT imaging as a method for comparing perfusion in graduated-height and single-height surgical staple lines.
    Eschbach M; Sindberg GM; Godek ML; Nagelschmidt M; Paquette N; Wegener M; Alberino J; Mayotte J; Vasanji A; Miesse AM
    Med Devices (Auckl); 2018; 11():267-273. PubMed ID: 30147383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.