These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35929954)

  • 1. Navigations of the targeting pathway of nanomedicines toward tumor.
    Tao Y; Lan X; Zhang Y; Qing G; Wang J; Xiao Y; Chen H; Liu L; Liang XJ; Guo W
    Expert Opin Drug Deliv; 2022 Aug; 19(8):985-996. PubMed ID: 35929954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transcytosis-enabled active extravasation of tumor nanomedicine.
    Zhou Q; Li J; Xiang J; Shao S; Zhou Z; Tang J; Shen Y
    Adv Drug Deliv Rev; 2022 Oct; 189():114480. PubMed ID: 35952830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. To exploit the tumor microenvironment: Since the EPR effect fails in the clinic, what is the future of nanomedicine?
    Danhier F
    J Control Release; 2016 Dec; 244(Pt A):108-121. PubMed ID: 27871992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perspectives for Improving the Tumor Targeting of Nanomedicine via the EPR Effect in Clinical Tumors.
    Kim J; Cho H; Lim DK; Joo MK; Kim K
    Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Jun; 24(12):. PubMed ID: 37373227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unraveling the role of Intralipid in suppressing off-target delivery and augmenting the therapeutic effects of anticancer nanomedicines.
    Islam R; Gao S; Islam W; Šubr V; Zhou JR; Yokomizo K; Etrych T; Maeda H; Fang J
    Acta Biomater; 2021 May; 126():372-383. PubMed ID: 33774199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reappraisal of anticancer nanomedicine design criteria in three types of preclinical cancer models for better clinical translation.
    Luan X; Yuan H; Song Y; Hu H; Wen B; He M; Zhang H; Li Y; Li F; Shu P; Burnett JP; Truchan N; Palmisano M; Pai MP; Zhou S; Gao W; Sun D
    Biomaterials; 2021 Aug; 275():120910. PubMed ID: 34144373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tumor targeting via EPR: Strategies to enhance patient responses.
    Golombek SK; May JN; Theek B; Appold L; Drude N; Kiessling F; Lammers T
    Adv Drug Deliv Rev; 2018 May; 130():17-38. PubMed ID: 30009886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The tumor EPR effect for cancer drug delivery: Current status, limitations, and alternatives.
    Sun R; Xiang J; Zhou Q; Piao Y; Tang J; Shao S; Zhou Z; Bae YH; Shen Y
    Adv Drug Deliv Rev; 2022 Dec; 191():114614. PubMed ID: 36347432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What Went Wrong with Anticancer Nanomedicine Design and How to Make It Right.
    Sun D; Zhou S; Gao W
    ACS Nano; 2020 Oct; 14(10):12281-12290. PubMed ID: 33021091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tumor extravasation and infiltration as barriers of nanomedicine for high efficacy: The current status and transcytosis strategy.
    Zhou Q; Dong C; Fan W; Jiang H; Xiang J; Qiu N; Piao Y; Xie T; Luo Y; Li Z; Liu F; Shen Y
    Biomaterials; 2020 May; 240():119902. PubMed ID: 32105817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Strategies to enhance drug delivery to solid tumors by harnessing the EPR effects and alternative targeting mechanisms.
    Zi Y; Yang K; He J; Wu Z; Liu J; Zhang W
    Adv Drug Deliv Rev; 2022 Sep; 188():114449. PubMed ID: 35835353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Protein corona: challenges and opportunities for targeted delivery of nanomedicines.
    Jiang Z; Chu Y; Zhan C
    Expert Opin Drug Deliv; 2022 Jul; 19(7):833-846. PubMed ID: 35738018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Platinum-based combination nanomedicines for cancer therapy.
    Li Y; Lin W
    Curr Opin Chem Biol; 2023 Jun; 74():102290. PubMed ID: 36989943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biological rationale for the design of polymeric anti-cancer nanomedicines.
    Zhou Y; Kopeček J
    J Drug Target; 2013 Jan; 21(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 23009337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Endocytosis and Organelle Targeting of Nanomedicines in Cancer Therapy.
    Wang X; Qiu Y; Wang M; Zhang C; Zhang T; Zhou H; Zhao W; Zhao W; Xia G; Shao R
    Int J Nanomedicine; 2020; 15():9447-9467. PubMed ID: 33268987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strategies to improve the EPR effect: A mechanistic perspective and clinical translation.
    Ikeda-Imafuku M; Wang LL; Rodrigues D; Shaha S; Zhao Z; Mitragotri S
    J Control Release; 2022 May; 345():512-536. PubMed ID: 35337939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nanomedicines for Reactive Oxygen Species Mediated Approach: An Emerging Paradigm for Cancer Treatment.
    Kwon S; Ko H; You DG; Kataoka K; Park JH
    Acc Chem Res; 2019 Jul; 52(7):1771-1782. PubMed ID: 31241894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parameters Affecting the Enhanced Permeability and Retention Effect: The Need for Patient Selection.
    Natfji AA; Ravishankar D; Osborn HMI; Greco F
    J Pharm Sci; 2017 Nov; 106(11):3179-3187. PubMed ID: 28669714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors affecting the dynamics and heterogeneity of the EPR effect: pathophysiological and pathoanatomic features, drug formulations and physicochemical factors.
    Islam R; Maeda H; Fang J
    Expert Opin Drug Deliv; 2022 Feb; 19(2):199-212. PubMed ID: 33430661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The EPR effect and beyond: Strategies to improve tumor targeting and cancer nanomedicine treatment efficacy.
    Shi Y; van der Meel R; Chen X; Lammers T
    Theranostics; 2020; 10(17):7921-7924. PubMed ID: 32685029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.