184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35929977)
1. A Review of Corneal Biomechanics and Scleral Stiffness in Topical Prostaglandin Analog Therapy for Glaucoma.
Shen SR; Fleming GP; Jain SG; Roberts CJ
Curr Eye Res; 2023 Feb; 48(2):172-181. PubMed ID: 35929977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating the Relationship of Intraocular Pressure and Anterior Chamber Volume With Use of Prostaglandin Analogues.
Scott JA; Roberts CJ; Mahmoud AM; Jain SG
J Glaucoma; 2021 May; 30(5):421-427. PubMed ID: 33149104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Changes in Corneal Biomechanical Properties after Long-Term Topical Prostaglandin Therapy.
Wu N; Chen Y; Yu X; Li M; Wen W; Sun X
PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155527. PubMed ID: 27187282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of prostaglandin analogues on the biomechanical corneal properties in patients with open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension measured with dynamic scheimpflug analyzer.
Martínez-Sánchez MI; Bolívar G; Sideroudi H; Teus MA
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2022 Dec; 260(12):3927-3933. PubMed ID: 35841397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The changes of corneal biomechanical properties with long-term treatment of prostaglandin analogue measured by Corvis ST.
Wu N; Chen Y; Yang Y; Sun X
BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Oct; 20(1):422. PubMed ID: 33081750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical contribution of the sclera to dynamic corneal response in air-puff induced deformation in human donor eyes.
Nguyen BA; Reilly MA; Roberts CJ
Exp Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 191():107904. PubMed ID: 31883460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of chronic use of prostaglandin analogues on the biomechanical properties of the cornea in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma.
Meda R; Wang Q; Paoloni D; Harasymowycz P; Brunette I
Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Feb; 101(2):120-125. PubMed ID: 27162226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraocular pressure measurements in diabetes mellitus.
Ramm L; Herber R; Spoerl E; Pillunat LE; Terai N
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2020 Nov; 30(6):1432-1439. PubMed ID: 31779470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A cross-sectional study to compare intraocular pressure measurement by sequential use of Goldman applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Corvis ST.
Tejwani S; Dinakaran S; Joshi A; Shetty R; Sinha Roy A
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 63(11):815-20. PubMed ID: 26669331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Latanoprost treatment differentially affects intraocular pressure readings obtained with three different tonometers.
Sánchez-Barahona C; Bolívar G; Katsanos A; Teus MA
Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 97(8):e1112-e1115. PubMed ID: 31184426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Biomechanically Corrected Intraocular Pressure Obtained by Corvis ST and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension.
Ye Y; Yang Y; Fan Y; Lan M; Yu K; Yu M
J Glaucoma; 2019 Oct; 28(10):922-928. PubMed ID: 31453898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the reichert ocular response analyzer.
Kirwan C; O'Keefe M; Lanigan B
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 142(6):990-2. PubMed ID: 17157583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of Prostaglandin Analogues on Corneal Biomechanical Parameters Measured With a Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer.
Yasukura Y; Miki A; Maeda N; Koh S; Nishida K
J Glaucoma; 2021 Nov; 30(11):996-1000. PubMed ID: 34086611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term changes in ocular rigidity following scleral buckling for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
Abdullatif AM; Albalkini AS; Albalkini MS; Macky TA; Khattab A; Attya M
Int Ophthalmol; 2022 May; 42(5):1491-1498. PubMed ID: 34817782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, the Dynamic Contour Tonometer, the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST in Measuring Intraocular Pressure following FS-LASIK.
Bao F; Huang W; Zhu R; Lu N; Wang Y; Li H; Wu S; Lin H; Wang J; Zheng X; Huang J; Li Y; Wang Q; Elsheikh A
Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):144-152. PubMed ID: 31869261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors affecting corneal deformation amplitude measured by Corvis ST in eyes with open-angle glaucoma.
Pradhan ZS; Sreenivasaiah S; Deshmukh S; Mangala L; Shroff S; Devi S; Webers CA; Rao HL
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2024 Apr; 72(4):533-537. PubMed ID: 38099366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Importance of accurately assessing biomechanics of the cornea.
Roberts CJ
Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2016 Jul; 27(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 27152485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Corneal biomechanics and biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure in primary open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension and controls.
Vinciguerra R; Rehman S; Vallabh NA; Batterbury M; Czanner G; Choudhary A; Cheeseman R; Elsheikh A; Willoughby CE
Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 104(1):121-126. PubMed ID: 30923134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties in glaucoma and control patients by dynamic Scheimpflug corneal imaging technology].
Coste V; Schweitzer C; Paya C; Touboul D; Korobelnik JF
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2015 Jun; 38(6):504-13. PubMed ID: 25976131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical Evaluation of Methods to Correct Intraocular Pressure Measurements by the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Ocular Response Analyzer, and Corvis ST Tonometer for the Effects of Corneal Stiffness Parameters.
Bao F; Huang Z; Huang J; Wang J; Deng M; Li L; Yu A; Wang Q; Elsheikh A
J Glaucoma; 2016 Jun; 25(6):510-9. PubMed ID: 26709500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]