These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35930533)

  • 1. Enhancing performance with multisensory cues in a realistic target discrimination task.
    Cinel C; Fernandez-Vargas J; Tremmel C; Citi L; Poli R
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0272320. PubMed ID: 35930533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multisensory integration affects ERP components elicited by exogenous cues.
    Santangelo V; Van der Lubbe RH; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Postma A
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Feb; 185(2):269-77. PubMed ID: 17909764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence for multisensory integration in the elicitation of prior entry by bimodal cues.
    Barrett DJ; Krumbholz K
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Oct; 222(1-2):11-20. PubMed ID: 22975896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Seeing the light: exploring the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Koppen C; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 180(4):737-54. PubMed ID: 17333012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microsaccadic modulation of response times in spatial attention tasks.
    Kliegl R; Rolfs M; Laubrock J; Engbert R
    Psychol Res; 2009 Mar; 73(2):136-46. PubMed ID: 19066951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory, tactile, and multisensory cues facilitate search for dynamic visual stimuli.
    Ngo MK; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1654-65. PubMed ID: 20675808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peripheral visual localization is degraded by globally incongruent auditory-spatial attention cues.
    Ahveninen J; Ingalls G; Yildirim F; Calabro FJ; Vaina LM
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Sep; 237(9):2137-2143. PubMed ID: 31201472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attentional capture by spoken language: effects on netballers' visual task performance.
    Bishop DT; Moore S; Horne S; Teszka R
    J Sports Sci; 2014; 32(17):1611-20. PubMed ID: 24734776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cross-modal cueing in audiovisual spatial attention.
    Blurton SP; Greenlee MW; Gondan M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2356-76. PubMed ID: 26001381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of crossmodal competition and dimensional overlap in crossmodal attention switching.
    Kreutzfeldt M; Stephan DN; Sturm W; Willmes K; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Feb; 155():67-76. PubMed ID: 25577489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The interplay of crossmodal attentional preparation and modality compatibility in cued task switching.
    Fintor E; Stephan DN; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):955-965. PubMed ID: 29642783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multisensory cues capture spatial attention regardless of perceptual load.
    Santangelo V; Spence C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1311-21. PubMed ID: 18085945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.
    Rodway P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploring the effectiveness of auditory, visual, and audio-visual sensory cues in a multiple object tracking environment.
    Föcker J; Atkins P; Vantzos FC; Wilhelm M; Schenk T; Meyerhoff HS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jul; 84(5):1611-1624. PubMed ID: 35610410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cue-target onset asynchrony modulates interaction between exogenous attention and audiovisual integration.
    Xu Z; Yang W; Zhou Z; Ren Y
    Cogn Process; 2020 May; 21(2):261-270. PubMed ID: 31953644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Crossmodal facilitation of masked visual target discrimination by informative auditory cuing.
    Ngo MK; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jul; 479(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 20580658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of spatial congruency on saccade and visual discrimination performance in a dual-task paradigm.
    Moehler T; Fiehler K
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():100-11. PubMed ID: 25449339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rule-based and stimulus-based cues bias auditory decisions via different computational and physiological mechanisms.
    Tardiff N; Suriya-Arunroj L; Cohen YE; Gold JI
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Oct; 18(10):e1010601. PubMed ID: 36206302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Importance of attentional mechanisms in audiovisual links.
    Dufour A
    Exp Brain Res; 1999 May; 126(2):215-22. PubMed ID: 10369144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.