150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35931558)
1. Accuracy of the Intraoral Scanner for Detection of Tooth Wear.
Mitrirattanakul S; Neoh SP; Chalarmchaichaloenkit J; Limthanabodi C; Trerayapiwat C; Pipatpajong N; Taechushong N; Chintavalakorn R
Int Dent J; 2023 Feb; 73(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 35931558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Application of the Intraoral Scanner in the Diagnosis of Dental Wear: An In Vivo Study of Tooth Wear Analysis.
García VD; Freire Y; Fernández SD; Murillo BT; Sánchez MG
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Apr; 19(8):. PubMed ID: 35457351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner.
Flügge TV; Schlager S; Nelson K; Nahles S; Metzger MC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Sep; 144(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 23992820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detecting early erosive tooth wear using an intraoral scanner system.
Michou S; Vannahme C; Ekstrand KR; Benetti AR
J Dent; 2020 Sep; 100():103445. PubMed ID: 32750388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of abutment tooth geometry on the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining dental impressions.
Carbajal Mejía JB; Wakabayashi K; Nakamura T; Yatani H
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):392-399. PubMed ID: 28222873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of two best-fit alignment strategies with different reference areas for wear measurement with an intraoral scanner: an in vitro study.
Li R; Zhang R; Zhou Y; Peng J
Int J Comput Dent; 2023 Nov; 26(4):331-337. PubMed ID: 36749282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data.
Patzelt SB; Bishti S; Stampf S; Att W
J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Nov; 145(11):1133-40. PubMed ID: 25359645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer-aided analysis of digital dental impressions obtained from intraoral and extraoral scanners.
Bohner LOL; De Luca Canto G; Marció BS; Laganá DC; Sesma N; Tortamano Neto P
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Nov; 118(5):617-623. PubMed ID: 28385434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the acquisition accuracy and digitizing noise of 9 intraoral and extraoral scanners: An objective method.
Dupagne L; Tapie L; Lebon N; Mawussi B
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1032-1040. PubMed ID: 33781577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of full-arch digital impressions: an in vitro and in vivo comparison.
Keul C; Güth JF
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Feb; 24(2):735-745. PubMed ID: 31134345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intraoral scanner-based monitoring of tooth wear in young adults: 24-month results.
Schlenz MA; Schlenz MB; Wöstmann B; Glatt AS; Ganss C
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jun; 27(6):2775-2785. PubMed ID: 36625960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Novel methodology for measuring intraoral wear in enamel and dental restorative materials.
F Esquivel-Upshaw J; Hsu SM; Bohórquez AC; Abdulhameed N; Scheiffele GW; Kim M; Neal D; Chai J; Ren F
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2020 Dec; 6(6):677-685. PubMed ID: 32955159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monitoring of simulated occlusal tooth wear by objective outcome measures.
Alwadai GS; Roberts G; Ungar PS; González-Cabezas C; Lippert F; Diefenderfer KE; Eckert GJ; Hara AT
J Dent; 2020 Nov; 102():103467. PubMed ID: 32916231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of digital intraoral scanner reproducibility and image trueness considering repetitive experience.
Lim JH; Park JM; Kim M; Heo SJ; Myung JY
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Feb; 119(2):225-232. PubMed ID: 28689906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Accuracy analysis of full-arch implant digital impressions when using a geometric feature].
Ke YF; Zhang YP; Chen JK; Chen H; Wang Y; Sun YC
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Feb; 57(2):162-167. PubMed ID: 35152652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of Liquid on the Tooth Surface on the Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study.
Chen Y; Zhai Z; Li H; Yamada S; Matsuoka T; Ono S; Nakano T
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jan; 31(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 33829613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability of qualitative occlusal tooth wear evaluation using an intraoral scanner: A pilot study.
Travassos da Rosa Moreira Bastos R; Teixeira da Silva P; Normando D
PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0249119. PubMed ID: 33765042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of complete-arch intraoral scans based on confocal microscopy versus optical triangulation: A comparative in vitro study.
Waldecker M; Rues S; Rammelsberg P; Bömicke W
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):414-420. PubMed ID: 32950254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of residual coronal tooth structure postendodontic cavity preparation using digital dental impressions and micro-computed tomography.
Al-Nuaimi N; Patel S; Foschi F; Mannocci F; Austin RS
Int J Comput Dent; 2017; 20(4):377-392. PubMed ID: 29292412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of three digital scanning methods for complete-arch tooth preparation: An in vitro comparison.
Gao H; Liu X; Liu M; Yang X; Tan J
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1001-1008. PubMed ID: 33736864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
