These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35931936)

  • 1. Comparison of parameter estimation approaches for multi-unidimensional pairwise preference tests.
    Tu N; Joo S; Lee P; Stark S
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Sep; 55(6):2764-2786. PubMed ID: 35931936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. GGUM-RANK Statement and Person Parameter Estimation With Multidimensional Forced Choice Triplets.
    Lee P; Joo SH; Stark S; Chernyshenko OS
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 May; 43(3):226-240. PubMed ID: 31019358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling Multidimensional Forced Choice Measures with the Zinnes and Griggs Pairwise Preference Item Response Theory Model.
    Joo SH; Lee P; Stark S
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(2):241-261. PubMed ID: 34370564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Dominance Variant Under the Multi-Unidimensional Pairwise-Preference Framework: Model Formulation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Estimation.
    Morillo D; Leenen I; Abad FJ; Hontangas P; de la Torre J; Ponsoda V
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Oct; 40(7):500-516. PubMed ID: 29881066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Linking Methods for Multidimensional Forced Choice Tests Using the Multi-Unidimensional Pairwise Preference Model.
    Tu N; Kumar LS; Joo S; Stark S
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2024 May; 48(3):104-124. PubMed ID: 38585303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adaptive testing with the GGUM-RANK multidimensional forced choice model: Comparison of pair, triplet, and tetrad scoring.
    Joo SH; Lee P; Stark S
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Apr; 52(2):761-772. PubMed ID: 31342469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimating the Multidimensional Generalized Graded Unfolding Model with Covariates Using a Bayesian Approach.
    Tu N; Zhang B; Angrave L; Sun T; Neuman M
    J Intell; 2023 Aug; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 37623546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8.
    Tu N; Zhang B; Angrave L; Sun T
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 Oct; 45(7-8):553-555. PubMed ID: 34866713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Explanatory Generalized Graded Unfolding Model: Incorporating Collateral Information to Improve the Latent Trait Estimation Accuracy.
    Joo SH; Lee P; Stark S
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Jan; 46(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 34898744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating Anchor-Item Designs for Concurrent Calibration With the GGUM.
    Joo SH; Lee P; Stark S
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Mar; 41(2):83-96. PubMed ID: 29881079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing Traditional and IRT Scoring of Forced-Choice Tests.
    Hontangas PM; de la Torre J; Ponsoda V; Leenen I; Morillo D; Abad FJ
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Nov; 39(8):598-612. PubMed ID: 29881030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A dual process item response theory model for polytomous multidimensional forced-choice items.
    Qiu X; de la Torre J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 Nov; 76(3):491-512. PubMed ID: 36967236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Item Parameter Estimation With the General Hyperbolic Cosine Ideal Point IRT Model.
    Joo SH; Chun S; Stark S; Chernyshenko OS
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Jan; 43(1):18-33. PubMed ID: 30573932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multidimensional IRT for forced choice tests: A literature review.
    Nie L; Xu P; Hu D
    Heliyon; 2024 Mar; 10(5):e26884. PubMed ID: 38449643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Linking Methods for the Zinnes-Griggs Pairwise Preference IRT Model.
    Lee P; Joo SH; Stark S
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Mar; 41(2):130-144. PubMed ID: 29881082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Hierarchical Multi-Unidimensional IRT Approach for Analyzing Sparse, Multi-Group Data for Integrative Data Analysis.
    Huo Y; de la Torre J; Mun EY; Kim SY; Ray AE; Jiao Y; White HR
    Psychometrika; 2015 Sep; 80(3):834-55. PubMed ID: 25265910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Comparison of Estimation Methods for a Multi-unidimensional Graded Response IRT Model.
    Kuo TC; Sheng Y
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():880. PubMed ID: 27375545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MCMC Z-G: An IRT Computer Program for Forced-Choice Noncognitive Measurement.
    Wang W; Lee P; Joo SH; Stark S; Louden R
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Oct; 40(7):551-553. PubMed ID: 29881069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Item Response Models for Forced-Choice Questionnaires: A Common Framework.
    Brown A
    Psychometrika; 2016 Mar; 81(1):135-60. PubMed ID: 25663304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bayesian Approaches for Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using the Generalized Graded Unfolding Model.
    Joo SH; Lee P; Stark S
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Mar; 46(2):98-115. PubMed ID: 35281341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.