BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35932702)

  • 1. Riparian buffers: Disrupting the transport of E. coli from rural catchments to streams.
    Lim TJY; Sargent R; Henry R; Fletcher TD; Coleman RA; McCarthy DT; Lintern A
    Water Res; 2022 Aug; 222():118897. PubMed ID: 35932702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Baseline assessment of the hydrological network and land use in riparian buffers of Pampean streams of Uruguay.
    Mary-Lauyé AL; González-Bergonzoni I; Gobel N; Somma A; Silva I; Lucas CM
    Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Nov; 195(1):80. PubMed ID: 36342548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Field-based evaluation tool for riparian buffer zones in agricultural catchments.
    Ducros CM; Joyce CB
    Environ Manage; 2003 Aug; 32(2):252-67. PubMed ID: 14753650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do Riparian Buffers Protect Stream Invertebrate Communities in South American Atlantic Forest Agricultural Areas?
    Hunt L; Marrochi N; Bonetto C; Liess M; Buss DF; Vieira da Silva C; Chiu MC; Resh VH
    Environ Manage; 2017 Dec; 60(6):1155-1170. PubMed ID: 28980050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Riparian buffer length is more influential than width on river water quality: A case study in southern Costa Rica.
    Hilary B; Chris B; North BE; Angelica Maria AZ; Sandra Lucia AZ; Carlos Alberto QG; Beatriz LG; Rachael E; Andrew W
    J Environ Manage; 2021 May; 286():112132. PubMed ID: 33621848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Riparian forests mitigate harmful ecological effects of agricultural diffuse pollution in medium-sized streams.
    Turunen J; Markkula J; Rajakallio M; Aroviita J
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 649():495-503. PubMed ID: 30176461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of local land-use on riparian vegetation, water quality, and the functional organization of macroinvertebrate assemblages.
    Fierro P; Bertrán C; Tapia J; Hauenstein E; Peña-Cortés F; Vergara C; Cerna C; Vargas-Chacoff L
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 609():724-734. PubMed ID: 28763669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Legal ecotones: A comparative analysis of riparian policy protection in the Oregon Coast Range, USA.
    Boisjolie BA; Santelmann MV; Flitcroft RL; Duncan SL
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Jul; 197():206-220. PubMed ID: 28388459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating stream water quality through land use analysis in two grassland catchments: impact of wetlands on stream nitrogen concentration.
    Hayakawa A; Shimizu M; Woli KP; Kuramochi K; Hatano R
    J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(2):617-27. PubMed ID: 16510707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of riparian forest buffers on in-stream nutrient retention in agricultural catchments.
    Weigelhofer G; Fuchsberger J; Teufl B; Welti N; Hein T
    J Environ Qual; 2012; 41(2):373-9. PubMed ID: 22370399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Riparian forest buffers mitigate the effects of deforestation on fish assemblages in tropical headwater streams.
    Lorion CM; Kennedy BP
    Ecol Appl; 2009 Mar; 19(2):468-79. PubMed ID: 19323203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Understanding stream bank erosion and deposition in Iowa, USA: A seven year study along streams in different regions with different riparian land-uses.
    Zaimes GΝ; Tamparopoulos AE; Tufekcioglu M; Schultz RC
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Jun; 287():112352. PubMed ID: 33743416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Importance of riparian forests in urban catchments contingent on sediment and hydrologic regimes.
    Roy AH; Freeman MC; Freeman BJ; Wenger SJ; Ensign WE; Meyer JL
    Environ Manage; 2006 Apr; 37(4):523-39. PubMed ID: 16465563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stocks in hybrid poplar buffers, herbaceous buffers and natural woodlots in the riparian zone on agricultural land.
    Fortier J; Truax B; Gagnon D; Lambert F
    J Environ Manage; 2015 May; 154():333-45. PubMed ID: 25753395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Regulating riparian forests for aquatic productivity in the Pacific Northwest, USA: addressing a paradox.
    Newton M; Ice G
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Jan; 23(2):1149-57. PubMed ID: 26611633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Land use affects total dissolved nitrogen and nitrate concentrations in tropical montane streams in Kenya.
    Jacobs SR; Breuer L; Butterbach-Bahl K; Pelster DE; Rufino MC
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 603-604():519-532. PubMed ID: 28645050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Thinking Upstream: How Do Landowner Attitudes Affect Forested Riparian Buffer Coverage?
    Armstrong A; Stedman RC
    Environ Manage; 2020 May; 65(5):689-701. PubMed ID: 32086548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relations between retired agricultural land, water quality, and aquatic-community health, Minnesota River Basin.
    Christensen VG; Lee KE; McLees JM; Niemela SL
    J Environ Qual; 2012; 41(5):1459-72. PubMed ID: 23099937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Large woody debris input and its influence on channel structure in agricultural lands of Southeast Brazil.
    de Paula FR; Ferraz SF; Gerhard P; Vettorazzi CA; Ferreira A
    Environ Manage; 2011 Oct; 48(4):750-63. PubMed ID: 21822981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identifying riparian buffer effects on stream nitrogen in southeastern coastal plain watersheds.
    Christensen JR; Nash MS; Neale A
    Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 52(5):1161-76. PubMed ID: 23989318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.