These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35933257)

  • 1. Treatment effects of maxillary protraction with palatal plates vs conventional tooth-borne anchorage in growing patients with Class III malocclusion.
    Lee YS; Park JH; Kim J; Lee NK; Kim Y; Kook YA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Oct; 162(4):520-528. PubMed ID: 35933257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment.
    Ngan P; Wilmes B; Drescher D; Martin C; Weaver B; Gunel E
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():26. PubMed ID: 26303311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of skeletal anchorage and tooth-borne maxillary protraction followed by fixed appliance in Class III malocclusion.
    Lee SH; Koh SD; Chung DH; Lee JW; Lee SM
    Eur J Orthod; 2020 Apr; 42(2):193-199. PubMed ID: 31750516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional comparative evaluation of customized bone-anchored vs tooth-borne maxillary protraction in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion.
    Liang S; Wang F; Chang Q; Bai Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Sep; 160(3):374-384. PubMed ID: 34172344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The short-term treatment effects of face mask therapy in Class III patients based on the anchorage device: miniplates vs rapid maxillary expansion.
    Lee NK; Yang IH; Baek SH
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Sep; 82(5):846-52. PubMed ID: 22264134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maxillary protraction with miniplates providing skeletal anchorage in a growing Class III patient.
    Cha BK; Choi DS; Ngan P; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Kim SM; Jang IS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):99-112. PubMed ID: 21195283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dentofacial effects of skeletal anchored treatment modalities for the correction of maxillary retrognathia.
    Sar C; Sahinoğlu Z; Özçirpici AA; Uçkan S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 24373654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of maxillary protraction with alternating rapid palatal expansion and constriction vs expansion alone in maxillary retrusive patients: a single-center, randomized controlled trial.
    Liu W; Zhou Y; Wang X; Liu D; Zhou S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Oct; 148(4):641-51. PubMed ID: 26432320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Class III Treatment with Skeletal and Dental Anchorage: A Review of Comparative Effects.
    Clemente R; Contardo L; Greco C; Di Lenarda R; Perinetti G
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():7946019. PubMed ID: 30057910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A retrospective comparison of two protocols for correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion in prepubertal children: hybrid hyrax expander with mandibular miniplates and rapid maxillary expansion with face mask.
    Tarraf NE; Dalci O; Dalci K; Altug AT; Darendeliler MA
    Prog Orthod; 2023 Jan; 24(1):3. PubMed ID: 36683080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the skeletodental effects of miniscrew-anchored and tooth-anchored facemask treatment in growing patients with skeletal class III malocclusions.
    Choi YK; Park JJ; Jeon HH; Kim YI
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 Nov; 26(4):695-703. PubMed ID: 37272219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of facemask therapy effects using skeletal and tooth-borne anchorage.
    Lee HJ; Choi DS; Jang I; Cha BK
    Angle Orthod; 2022 May; 92(3):307-314. PubMed ID: 34964848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Facemask therapy with skeletal anchorage: A possible alternative to orthognathic surgery.
    Cha BK; Park JH; Choi DS; Jang I
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Mar; 24 Suppl 1():13-20. PubMed ID: 33119188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage.
    Sar C; Arman-Özçırpıcı A; Uçkan S; Yazıcı AC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):636-49. PubMed ID: 21536207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Class III malocclusion treated with a 3D-printed hybrid hyrax distalizer combined with mentoplate using Alt-RAMEC protocol: A case report.
    Kathem SJ; Matras RC; Abbas SOM
    J Orthod; 2024 Jun; 51(2):183-191. PubMed ID: 37392009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative evaluation of midfacial soft tissue and nasal bone changes with two maxillary protraction protocols: Tooth-borne vs skeletal-anchored facemasks.
    Jang YK; Chung DH; Lee JW; Lee SM; Park JH
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Mar; 24 Suppl 1():5-12. PubMed ID: 33237624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the effects of maxillary protraction using facemask and miniplate anchorage between unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients.
    Ahn HW; Kim KW; Yang IH; Choi JY; Baek SH
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Sep; 82(5):935-41. PubMed ID: 22380632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application and effectiveness of a mini-implant- and tooth-borne rapid palatal expansion device: the hybrid hyrax.
    Wilmes B; Nienkemper M; Drescher D
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 21490997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-phase treatment concept for skeletal Class III growing patients with severe space deficiency: A report of three cases with skeletally anchored maxillary protraction.
    Lin HY; Yang H; Lai EH; Lin SY; Chang JZ
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2020 Apr; 119(4):869-878. PubMed ID: 31331705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Maxillary protaction with zygomatic anchorage in a growing class III patient.
    Aldaz J; Andrade D; Aguilar E; Bravo M
    Int Orthod; 2019 Jun; 17(2):395-401. PubMed ID: 31056418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.