316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35933491)
21. Gaze behavior is related to objective technical skills assessment during virtual reality simulator-based surgical training: a proof of concept.
Galuret S; Vallée N; Tronchot A; Thomazeau H; Jannin P; Huaulmé A
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2023 Sep; 18(9):1697-1705. PubMed ID: 37286642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Virtual reality-based assessment of basic laparoscopic skills using the Leap Motion controller.
Lahanas V; Loukas C; Georgiou K; Lababidi H; Al-Jaroudi D
Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5012-5023. PubMed ID: 28466361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Virtual Reality Single-Port Sleeve Gastrectomy Training Decreases Physical and Mental Workload in Novice Surgeons: An Exploratory Study.
Barré J; Michelet D; Truchot J; Jolivet E; Recanzone T; Stiti S; Tesnière A; Pourcher G
Obes Surg; 2019 Apr; 29(4):1309-1316. PubMed ID: 30689172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Video-based self-assessment enhances laparoscopic skills on a virtual reality simulator: a randomized controlled trial.
Netter A; Schmitt A; Agostini A; Crochet P
Surg Endosc; 2021 Dec; 35(12):6679-6686. PubMed ID: 33241429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Usability of a virtual reality manual wheelchair simulator.
Chaar F; Archambault PS
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2023 Nov; 18(8):1489-1499. PubMed ID: 35175178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Development and Validation of a Virtual Reality Haptic Femoral Nailing Simulator.
Racy M; Barrow A; Tomlinson J; Bello F
J Surg Educ; 2021; 78(3):1013-1023. PubMed ID: 33162363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator.
Botden SM; Buzink SN; Schijven MP; Jakimowicz JJ
World J Surg; 2007 Apr; 31(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 17361356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cognitive load and performance in immersive virtual reality versus conventional virtual reality simulation training of laparoscopic surgery: a randomized trial.
Frederiksen JG; Sørensen SMD; Konge L; Svendsen MBS; Nobel-Jørgensen M; Bjerrum F; Andersen SAW
Surg Endosc; 2020 Mar; 34(3):1244-1252. PubMed ID: 31172325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Usability, acceptance, and educational usefulness study of a new haptic operative dentistry virtual reality simulator.
Rodrigues P; Esteves A; Botelho J; Machado V; Zagalo C; Zorzal ER; Mendes JJ; Lopes DS
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Jun; 221():106831. PubMed ID: 35544961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Systematic Review of Virtual Haptics in Surgical Simulation: A Valid Educational Tool?
Rangarajan K; Davis H; Pucher PH
J Surg Educ; 2020; 77(2):337-347. PubMed ID: 31564519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Virtual and Augmented Reality Simulators Show Intraoperative, Surgical Training, and Athletic Training Applications: A Scoping Review.
Dhillon J; Tanguilig G; Kraeutler MJ
Arthroscopy; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38387769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Say, What Is on Your Mind? Surgeons' Evaluations of Realism and Usability of a Virtual Reality Vertebroplasty Simulator.
Koch A; Pfandler M; Stefan P; Wucherer P; Lazarovici M; Navab N; Stumpf U; Schmidmaier R; Glaser J; Weigl M
Surg Innov; 2019 Apr; 26(2):234-243. PubMed ID: 30646810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The effect of 3D stereopsis and hand-tool alignment on learning effectiveness and skill transfer of a VR-based simulator for dental training.
Kaluschke M; Yin MS; Haddawy P; Suebnukarn S; Zachmann G
PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0291389. PubMed ID: 37792776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Virtual Reality
Cowan A; Chen J; Mingo S; Reddy SS; Ma R; Marshall S; Nguyen JH; Hung AJ
J Endourol; 2021 Oct; 35(10):1571-1576. PubMed ID: 34235970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Objective Assessment of Laparoscopic Force and Psychomotor Skills in a Novel Virtual Reality-Based Haptic Simulator.
Prasad MS; Manivannan M; Manoharan G; Chandramohan SM
J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(5):858-69. PubMed ID: 27267563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Expert sampling of VR simulator metrics for automated assessment of mastoidectomy performance.
Andersen SAW; Mikkelsen PT; Sørensen MS
Laryngoscope; 2019 Sep; 129(9):2170-2177. PubMed ID: 30628093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The role of virtual reality simulation in surgical training in the light of COVID-19 pandemic: Visual spatial ability as a predictor for improved surgical performance: a randomized trial.
Sommer GM; Broschewitz J; Huppert S; Sommer CG; Jahn N; Jansen-Winkeln B; Gockel I; Hau HM
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Dec; 100(50):e27844. PubMed ID: 34918632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of a New Virtual Reality Concept Teaching K-Wire Drilling With Force Feedback Simulated Haptic in Orthopedic Skills Training.
Huber M; Katzky U; Müller K; Blätzinger M; Goetz W; Grechenig P; Popp D; Angerpointner K
J Hand Surg Am; 2022 Dec; 47(12):1225.e1-1225.e7. PubMed ID: 34857404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Development of a proficiency-based virtual reality simulation training curriculum for laparoscopic appendicectomy.
Sirimanna P; Gladman MA
ANZ J Surg; 2017 Oct; 87(10):760-766. PubMed ID: 28803457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Face and construct validation of a next generation virtual reality (Gen2-VR) surgical simulator.
Sankaranarayanan G; Li B; Manser K; Jones SB; Jones DB; Schwaitzberg S; Cao CG; De S
Surg Endosc; 2016 Mar; 30(3):979-85. PubMed ID: 26092010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
