231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35933726)
1. Comparison of primiparous women's childbirth experience in labor induction with cervical ripening by balloon catheter or oral misoprostol - a prospective study using a validated childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ) and visual analogue scale (VAS).
Place K; Kruit H; Rahkonen L
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Oct; 101(10):1153-1162. PubMed ID: 35933726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol vs transvaginal balloon catheter for labor induction: An observational study within the SWEdish Postterm Induction Study (SWEPIS).
Alkmark M; Carlsson Y; Wendel SB; Elden H; Fadl H; Jonsson M; Ladfors L; Saltvedt S; Sengpiel V; Wessberg A; Wikström AK; Hagberg H; Wennerholm UB
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Aug; 100(8):1463-1477. PubMed ID: 33768520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Childbirth experience in induced labor: A prospective study using a validated childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ) with a focus on the first birth.
Place K; Rahkonen L; Verho-Reischl N; Adler K; Heinonen S; Kruit H
PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0274949. PubMed ID: 36201518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Methods for the induction of labor: efficacy and safety.
Sanchez-Ramos L; Levine LD; Sciscione AC; Mozurkewich EL; Ramsey PS; Adair CD; Kaunitz AM; McKinney JA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar; 230(3S):S669-S695. PubMed ID: 38462252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Safety and efficacy of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Zhao G; Song G; Liu J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Sep; 22(1):688. PubMed ID: 36068489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Women's acceptance of a double-balloon device as an additional method for inducing labour.
Kehl S; Welzel G; Ehard A; Berlit S; Spaich S; Siemer J; Sütterlin M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 May; 168(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 23298898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sequential use of double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term (CRBplus trial): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial.
Kehl S; Ziegler J; Schleussner E; Tuschy B; Berlit S; Kirscht J; Hägele F; Weiss C; Siemer J; Sütterlin M
BJOG; 2015 Jan; 122(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 25327872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Women satisfaction on choosing the cervical ripening method: Oral misoprostol versus balloon catheter.
Flament E; Blanc-Petitjean P; Koch A; Deruelle P; Le Ray C; Sananès N
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X; 2023 Sep; 19():100202. PubMed ID: 37426940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparison of vaginal prostaglandins with oral misoprostol as a second line of cervical ripening after using a cervical balloon catheter].
Hadhoum S; Ghesquière L; Drumez E; Subtil D; Garabedian C
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2024 Feb; 52(2):68-73. PubMed ID: 37995911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Buccal vs vaginal misoprostol combined with Foley catheter for cervical ripening at term (the BEGIN trial): a randomized controlled trial.
Gomez HB; Hoffman MK; Caplan R; Ruhstaller K; Young MHH; Sciscione AC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 May; 224(5):524.e1-524.e8. PubMed ID: 33617796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Double-balloon catheter and sequential oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term: a retrospective cohort study.
Kehl S; Weiss C; Dammer U; Heimrich J; Beckmann MW; Faschingbauer F; Sütterlin M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Sep; 204():78-82. PubMed ID: 27525685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pain and satisfaction in women induced by vaginal dinoprostone, double balloon catheter and oral misoprostol.
Druenne J; Semay T; Giraud A; Chauleur C; Raia-Barjat T
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2022 Dec; 51(10):102484. PubMed ID: 36228867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Methods of induction of labor and women's experience: a population-based cohort study with mediation analyses.
Blanc-Petitjean P; Dupont C; Carbonne B; Salomé M; Goffinet F; Ray CL;
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Sep; 21(1):621. PubMed ID: 34521377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Misoprostol combined with cervical single or double balloon catheters versus misoprostol alone for labor induction of singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Ornat L; Alonso-Ventura V; Bueno-Notivol J; Chedraui P; Pérez-López FR;
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Oct; 33(20):3453-3468. PubMed ID: 30741051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Foley catheter vs prostaglandin as ripening agent in pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes.
Mackeen AD; Walker L; Ruhstaller K; Schuster M; Sciscione A
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2014 Sep; 114(9):686-92. PubMed ID: 25170038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Timing of sequential use of double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol for induction of labor.
Kehl S; Böhm L; Weiss C; Heimrich J; Dammer U; Baier F; Sütterlin M; Beckmann MW; Faschingbauer F
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1495-1501. PubMed ID: 27642010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Women's Experiences with and Preference for Induction of Labor with Oral Misoprostol or Foley Catheter at Term.
Ten Eikelder ML; van de Meent MM; Mast K; Rengerink KO; Jozwiak M; de Graaf IM; Scholtenhuis MA; Roumen FJ; Porath MM; van Loon AJ; van den Akker ES; Rijnders RJ; Feitsma AH; Adriaanse AH; Muller MA; de Leeuw JW; Visser H; Woiski MD; Weerd SR; van Unnik GA; Pernet PJ; Versendaal H; Mol BW; Bloemenkamp KW
Am J Perinatol; 2017 Jan; 34(2):138-146. PubMed ID: 27341122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Developing and validating the Caesarean risk assessment nomogram and comparing the effect of cervical ripening balloon, evening primrose oil and misoprostol on childbirth outcomes in term pregnancies: A study protocol.
Hemmatzadeh S; Abbasalizadeh F; Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi S; Asghari Jafarabady M; Mirghafourvand M
Nurs Open; 2021 Sep; 8(5):2892-2900. PubMed ID: 33689238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective observational study investigating the effectiveness, safety, women's experiences and quality of life at 3 months regarding cervical ripening methods for induction of labor at term-The MATUCOL study protocol.
Ducarme G; Martin S; Chesnoy V; Planche L; Berte MP; Netier-Herault E
PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262292. PubMed ID: 35061804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
