232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35933726)
21. [Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter pre-induction of labor].
Jagielska I; Kazdepka-Ziemińska A; Janicki R; Fórmaniak J; Walentowicz-Sadłecka M; Grabiec M
Ginekol Pol; 2013 Mar; 84(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 23700844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A comparison of cervical ripening modalities among overweight and obese nulliparous gravidas.
Sarumi MA; Gherman RB; Bell TD; Jairath P; Johnson MJ; Burgess AL
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Nov; 33(22):3804-3808. PubMed ID: 30810422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [Cervical Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial].
Oliveira MV; Oberst PV; Leite GK; Aguemi A; Kenj G; Leme VD; Sass N
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2010 Jul; 32(7):346-51. PubMed ID: 21152844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of changes in pre-induction cervical factors' scores following ripening with transcervical foley catheter and intravaginal misoprostol.
Adeniji AO; Olayemi O; Odukogbe AA; Aimakhu CO; Oladokun A; Akindele FO; Adeniji OI; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
Afr J Med Med Sci; 2005 Dec; 34(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 16752669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Induction to delivery interval using transcervical Foley catheter plus oxytocin and vaginal misoprostol: A comparative study at Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria.
Garba I; Muhammed AS; Muhammad Z; Galadanci HS; Ayyuba R; Abubakar IS
Ann Afr Med; 2016; 15(3):114-9. PubMed ID: 27549415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Double-balloon catheter compared with single-balloon catheter for induction of labor with a scarred uterus.
Xing Y; Li N; Ji Q; Hong L; Wang X; Xing B
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Dec; 243():139-143. PubMed ID: 31704530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Balloon catheter use for cervical ripening in women with term pre-labor rupture of membranes: A 5-year cohort study.
Kruit H; Tolvanen J; Eriksson J; Place K; Nupponen I; Rahkonen L
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Sep; 99(9):1174-1180. PubMed ID: 32242917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Intravaginal administration of isosorbide mononitrate and misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour: a randomized controlled trial.
Abdellah MS; Hussien M; Aboalhassan A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Jul; 284(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 20582425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Low dose intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical baloon catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening.
Tabowei TO; Oboro VO
East Afr Med J; 2003 Feb; 80(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 16167722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A randomized controlled trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus oxytocin for labor induction.
Moraes Filho OB; Albuquerque RM; Cecatti JG
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Aug; 89(8):1045-52. PubMed ID: 20636243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour.
Chen W; Xue J; Peprah MK; Wen SW; Walker M; Gao Y; Tang Y
BJOG; 2016 Feb; 123(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 26538408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review.
Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM; Alfirevic Z
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):798-803. PubMed ID: 10453829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Combined Foley's catheter with vaginal misoprostol for pre-induction cervical ripening: A randomised controlled trial.
Aduloju OP; Akintayo AA; Adanikin AI; Ade-Ojo IP
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Dec; 56(6):578-584. PubMed ID: 27385377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Ham D; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 180(5):1155-60. PubMed ID: 10329871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
Hofmeyr GJ; Gulmezoglu AM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (3):CD000941. PubMed ID: 11686970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Vaginal misoprostol and cervical ripening balloon for induction of labor in late-term pregnancies.
Duro Gómez J; Garrido Oyarzún MF; Rodríguez Marín AB; de la Torre González AJ; Arjona Berral JE; Castelo-Branco C
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2017 Jan; 43(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 27928864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus vaginal isosorbide mononitrate for labor induction.
El-Khayat W; Alelaiw H; El-kateb A; Elsemary A
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(3):487-92. PubMed ID: 25694257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Combination of Foley and prostaglandins versus Foley and oxytocin for cervical ripening: a network meta-analysis.
Orr L; Reisinger-Kindle K; Roy A; Levine L; Connolly K; Visintainer P; Schoen CN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Nov; 223(5):743.e1-743.e17. PubMed ID: 32387325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Women's expectations and experiences of labor induction - a questionnaire-based analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
Strandberg M; Wallstrom T; Wiberg-Itzel E
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 May; 21(1):355. PubMed ID: 33947349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of delivery outcomes in low-dose and high-dose oxytocin regimens for induction of labor following cervical ripening with a balloon catheter: A retrospective observational cohort study.
Kruit H; Nupponen I; Heinonen S; Rahkonen L
PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0267400. PubMed ID: 35452451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
