These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35933726)

  • 41. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003; (1):CD000941. PubMed ID: 12535398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of effectiveness and safety of cervical ripening methods for induction of labour: A population-based study using coarsened exact matching.
    Blanc-Petitjean P; Carbonne B; Deneux-Tharaux C; Salomé M; Goffinet F; Le Ray C;
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2019 Sep; 33(5):313-322. PubMed ID: 31342567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A comparison of 30-, 50-, and 60-mL foley catheter balloon volume and time to achieve cervical ripening for labor induction: A triple-blind randomized controlled trial.
    Cousin KO; Ebeigbe PN
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2023 Jul; 26(7):871-880. PubMed ID: 37635569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Double-balloon catheter compared to vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in obese women at term].
    Grange J; Dimet J; Vital M; Le Thuaut A; Ducarme G
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2017 Oct; 45(10):521-527. PubMed ID: 28757105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Vaginal assessment and expedited amniotomy in oral misoprostol labor induction in nulliparas: a randomized trial.
    Win ST; Tan PC; Balchin I; Khong SY; Si Lay K; Omar SZ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 220(4):387.e1-387.e12. PubMed ID: 30633917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Induction of labour in pre-eclamptic women: a randomised trial comparing the Foley balloon catheter with oral misoprostol.
    Bracken H; Mundle S; Faragher B; Easterling T; Haycox A; Turner M; Alfirevic Z; Winikoff B; Weeks A
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Sep; 14():308. PubMed ID: 25193157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
    Afolabi BB; Oyeneyin OL; Ogedengbe OK
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 Jun; 89(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 15919393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Gulmezoglu AM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (1):CD000941. PubMed ID: 11279698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Time-to-delivery and delivery outcomes comparing three methods of labor induction in 7551 nulliparous women: a population-based cohort study.
    Wollmann CL; Ahlberg M; Petersson G; Saltvedt S; Stephansson O
    J Perinatol; 2017 Nov; 37(11):1197-1203. PubMed ID: 29138519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Retrospective comparison of effectiveness of balloon catheter versus dinoprostone for cervical ripening].
    Baumont M; Dap M; Schweizer C; Morel O; Boukerrou M
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2021 Sep; 49(9):660-664. PubMed ID: 33636411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Experiences of induction of labor with a catheter - A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the outpatient and inpatient setting.
    Haavisto H; Polo-Kantola P; Anttila E; Kolari T; Ojala E; Rinne K
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Mar; 100(3):410-417. PubMed ID: 33140841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Cervical ripening and induction of labor with misoprostol, dinoprostone gel, and a Foley catheter: a randomized trial of 3 techniques.
    Barrilleaux PS; Bofill JA; Terrone DA; Magann EF; May WL; Morrison JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 186(6):1124-9. PubMed ID: 12066084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Foley Catheter or Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor in Women with Term Premature Rupture of Membranes: A Randomized Multicenter Trial.
    Kruit H; Tihtonen K; Raudaskoski T; Ulander VM; Aitokallio-Tallberg A; Heikinheimo O; Paavonen J; Rahkonen L
    Am J Perinatol; 2016 Jul; 33(9):866-72. PubMed ID: 27031055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Cervical ripening balloon with and without oxytocin in multiparas: a randomized controlled trial.
    Bauer AM; Lappen JR; Gecsi KS; Hackney DN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Sep; 219(3):294.e1-294.e6. PubMed ID: 29763609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Methods for assessing pre-induction cervical ripening.
    Ezebialu IU; Eke AC; Eleje GU; Nwachukwu CE
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Jun; 2015(6):CD010762. PubMed ID: 26068943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A comparison of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for cervical ripening in women for labor induction at term (the IMPROVE trial): a triple-masked randomized controlled trial.
    Haas DM; Daggy J; Flannery KM; Dorr ML; Bonsack C; Bhamidipalli SS; Pierson RC; Lathrop A; Towns R; Ngo N; Head A; Morgan S; Quinney SK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 221(3):259.e1-259.e16. PubMed ID: 31075246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Digital vs speculum-guided catheter balloon insertion for cervical ripening in multiparas: a randomized controlled trial.
    Abu Shqara R; Nakhleh Francis Y; Haj H; Markdorf S; Lowenstein L; Frank Wolf M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Jun; 5(6):100943. PubMed ID: 36972835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Maternal childbirth experience in induced and spontaneous labour measured in a visual analog scale and the factors influencing it; a two-year cohort study.
    Adler K; Rahkonen L; Kruit H
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Jul; 20(1):415. PubMed ID: 32693773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Hill JB; Thigpen BD; Bofill JA; Magann E; Moore LE; Martin JN
    Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18850516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Women's experience of induction of labor using PGE2 as an inpatient versus balloon catheter as an outpatient.
    Beckmann M; Acreman M; Schmidt E; Merollini KMD; Miller Y
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jun; 249():1-6. PubMed ID: 32311627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.