BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35934625)

  • 1. Active Surveillance for Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Metaregression.
    Baboudjian M; Breda A; Rajwa P; Gallioli A; Gondran-Tellier B; Sanguedolce F; Verri P; Diana P; Territo A; Bastide C; Spratt DE; Loeb S; Tosoian JJ; Leapman MS; Palou J; Ploussard G
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Dec; 5(6):617-627. PubMed ID: 35934625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Systematic Review of Active Surveillance for Clinically Localised Prostate Cancer to Develop Recommendations Regarding Inclusion of Intermediate-risk Disease, Biopsy Characteristics at Inclusion and Monitoring, and Surveillance Repeat Biopsy Strategy.
    Willemse PM; Davis NF; Grivas N; Zattoni F; Lardas M; Briers E; Cumberbatch MG; De Santis M; Dell'Oglio P; Donaldson JF; Fossati N; Gandaglia G; Gillessen S; Grummet JP; Henry AM; Liew M; MacLennan S; Mason MD; Moris L; Plass K; O'Hanlon S; Omar MI; Oprea-Lager DE; Pang KH; Paterson CC; Ploussard G; Rouvière O; Schoots IG; Tilki D; van den Bergh RCN; Van den Broeck T; van der Kwast TH; van der Poel HG; Wiegel T; Yuan CY; Cornford P; Mottet N; Lam TBL
    Eur Urol; 2022 Apr; 81(4):337-346. PubMed ID: 34980492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Active Surveillance of Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer: Long-term Outcomes from a Large Prospective Cohort.
    Tosoian JJ; Mamawala M; Epstein JI; Landis P; Macura KJ; Simopoulos DN; Carter HB; Gorin MA
    Eur Urol; 2020 Jun; 77(6):675-682. PubMed ID: 31918957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adverse Pathologic Findings for Men Electing Immediate Radical Prostatectomy: Defining a Favorable Intermediate-Risk Group.
    Patel HD; Tosoian JJ; Carter HB; Epstein JI
    JAMA Oncol; 2018 Jan; 4(1):89-92. PubMed ID: 28715578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Downgrading of grade group 2 intermediate-risk prostate cancer from biopsy to radical prostatectomy: Comparison of outcomes and predictors to identify potential candidates for active surveillance.
    Su ZT; Patel HD; Epstein JI; Pavlovich CP; Allaf ME
    Cancer; 2020 Apr; 126(8):1632-1639. PubMed ID: 32031685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Factors Determining Change to Radical Treatment in Active Surveillance for Localized Prostate Cancer.
    Simpkin AJ; Tilling K; Martin RM; Lane JA; Hamdy FC; Holmberg L; Neal DE; Metcalfe C; Donovan JL
    Eur Urol; 2015 Jun; 67(6):993-1005. PubMed ID: 25616709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcomes of initially expectantly managed patients with low or intermediate risk screen-detected localized prostate cancer.
    Bul M; van den Bergh RC; Zhu X; Rannikko A; Vasarainen H; Bangma CH; Schröder FH; Roobol MJ
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1672-7. PubMed ID: 22928973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Active Surveillance for Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Current Protocols and Outcomes.
    Enikeev D; Morozov A; Taratkin M; Barret E; Kozlov V; Singla N; Rivas JG; Podoinitsin A; Margulis V; Glybochko P
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2020 Dec; 18(6):e739-e753. PubMed ID: 32768356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Active surveillance in favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer: A single-center experience.
    Bandelier Q; Bastide C; Charvet AL; Leclercq L; Gondran-Tellier B; Campagna J; Long-Depaquit T; Daniel L; Rossi D; Lechevallier E; Baboudjian M
    Fr J Urol; 2024 Jan; 34(1):102537. PubMed ID: 37783635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcomes of Active Surveillance for Men With Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.
    Chandrasekar T; Bowler N; Schneider A; Goldberg H; Mark JR; Trabulsi EJ; Lallas CD; Gomella LG
    Urology; 2021 Sep; 155():101-109. PubMed ID: 34186134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identifying intermediate-risk candidates for active surveillance of prostate cancer.
    Savdie R; Aning J; So AI; Black PC; Gleave ME; Goldenberg SL
    Urol Oncol; 2017 Oct; 35(10):605.e1-605.e8. PubMed ID: 28736249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of Initial Gleason Grade on Outcomes during Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.
    Masic S; Cowan JE; Washington SL; Nguyen HG; Shinohara K; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Oct; 1(5):386-394. PubMed ID: 31158077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy a useful addition to systematic confirmatory biopsy in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Schoots IG; Nieboer D; Giganti F; Moore CM; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
    BJU Int; 2018 Dec; 122(6):946-958. PubMed ID: 29679430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Long-Term Risks of Metastases in Men on Active Surveillance for Early Stage Prostate Cancer.
    Maggi M; Cowan JE; Fasulo V; Washington SL; Lonergan PE; Sciarra A; Nguyen HG; Carroll PR
    J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1222-1228. PubMed ID: 33157570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer in a Real-life Cohort: Comparing Outcomes for PRIAS-eligible and PRIAS-ineligible Patients.
    Soeterik TFW; van Melick HHE; Dijksman LM; Biesma DH; Witjes JA; van Basten JA
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Aug; 1(3):231-237. PubMed ID: 31102626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using Competing Risk of Mortality to Inform the Transition from Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance to Watchful Waiting.
    Huang MM; Alam R; Gabrielson AT; Su ZT; Kassiri B; Fletcher SA; Biles MJ; Patel HD; Pavlovich CP; Schwen ZR
    Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Sep; 8(5):1141-1150. PubMed ID: 34344628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature.
    Dall'Era MA; Albertsen PC; Bangma C; Carroll PR; Carter HB; Cooperberg MR; Freedland SJ; Klotz LH; Parker C; Soloway MS
    Eur Urol; 2012 Dec; 62(6):976-83. PubMed ID: 22698574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcome following active surveillance of men with screen-detected prostate cancer. Results from the Göteborg randomised population-based prostate cancer screening trial.
    Godtman RA; Holmberg E; Khatami A; Stranne J; Hugosson J
    Eur Urol; 2013 Jan; 63(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 22980443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prostate-Specific Antigen-Based Screening for Prostate Cancer: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
    Fenton JJ; Weyrich MS; Durbin S; Liu Y; Bang H; Melnikow J
    JAMA; 2018 May; 319(18):1914-1931. PubMed ID: 29801018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Pathological and Oncologic Outcomes of Favorable Risk Gleason Score 3 + 4 and Low Risk Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer: Considerations for Active Surveillance.
    Gearman DJ; Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Karnes RJ
    J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1188-1195. PubMed ID: 29225057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.