BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35934748)

  • 1. Single-incision compared with conventional laparoscopy for appendectomy in acute appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Li C; Liu Y; Jiang Y; Xu Y; Wang Z
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2022 Sep; 37(9):1925-1935. PubMed ID: 35934748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single-incision appendectomy is comparable to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a systematic review and pooled analysis.
    Gill RS; Shi X; Al-Adra DP; Birch DW; Karmali S
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2012 Aug; 22(4):319-27. PubMed ID: 22874680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy for adult acute appendicitis: a Meta-analysis for randomized controlled trials].
    Kuang X; Duan S; Wang J; Peng Z
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2014 Dec; 39(12):1299-305. PubMed ID: 25544165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Hua J; Gong J; Xu B; Yang T; Song Z
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2014 Feb; 18(2):426-36. PubMed ID: 24002764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single incision laparoscopic appendicectomy versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendicectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Aly OE; Black DH; Rehman H; Ahmed I
    Int J Surg; 2016 Nov; 35():120-128. PubMed ID: 27686264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single-incision versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Han Y; Yuan H; Li S; Wang WF
    Asian J Surg; 2024 Feb; 47(2):864-873. PubMed ID: 38185558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in children.
    Zhang Z; Wang Y; Liu R; Zhao L; Liu H; Zhang J; Li G
    J Pediatr Surg; 2015 Sep; 50(9):1600-9. PubMed ID: 26095165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Single site versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: some pain for no gain?
    Goodman LF; Lin AC; Sacks MA; McRae JJLH; Radulescu A; Khan FA
    J Surg Res; 2021 Aug; 264():321-326. PubMed ID: 33848830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy vs conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Cai YL; Xiong XZ; Wu SJ; Cheng Y; Lu J; Zhang J; Lin YX; Cheng NS
    World J Gastroenterol; 2013 Aug; 19(31):5165-73. PubMed ID: 23964153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Should single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy be the new standard for pediatric appendicitis?
    Chang PC; Lin SC; Duh YC; Huang H; Fu YW; Hsu YJ; Wei CH
    Pediatr Neonatol; 2020 Aug; 61(4):426-431. PubMed ID: 32317218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-incision versus conventional multiport appendicectomy.
    Markar SR; Karthikesalingam A; Di Franco F; Harris AM
    Br J Surg; 2013 Dec; 100(13):1709-18. PubMed ID: 24227355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intra-/Extracorporeal Single-Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Fujii T; Tanaka A; Katami H; Shimono R
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2022 Jun; 32(6):702-712. PubMed ID: 35443815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acute appendicitis can be treated with single-incision laparoscopy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
    Vettoretto N; Cirocchi R; Randolph J; Morino M
    Colorectal Dis; 2015 Apr; 17(4):281-9. PubMed ID: 25406831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendicectomy in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhao L; Liao Z; Feng S; Wu P; Chen G
    Pediatr Surg Int; 2015 Apr; 31(4):347-53. PubMed ID: 25667049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in 688 patients: a retrospective comparative analysis.
    Liang HH; Hung CS; Wang W; Tam KW; Chang CC; Liu HH; Yen KL; Wei PL
    Can J Surg; 2014 Jun; 57(3):E89-97. PubMed ID: 24869622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing single incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.
    Clerveus M; Morandeira-Rivas A; Moreno-Sanz C; Herrero-Bogajo ML; Picazo-Yeste JS; Tadeo-Ruiz G
    World J Surg; 2014 Aug; 38(8):1937-46. PubMed ID: 24682257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicitis: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Xue C; Lin B; Huang Z; Chen Z
    Surg Today; 2015 Sep; 45(9):1179-86. PubMed ID: 25539980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Single-incision versus three-port laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Xu AM; Huang L; Li TJ
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Apr; 29(4):822-43. PubMed ID: 25106718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Single incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic appendectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Zhou H; Jin K; Zhang J; Wang W; Sun Y; Ruan C; Hu Z
    Dig Surg; 2014; 31(4-5):384-91. PubMed ID: 25547093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laparoscopic appendectomy with single port vs conventional access: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
    Cirocchi R; Cianci MC; Amato L; Properzi L; Buononato M; Di Rienzo VM; Tebala GD; Avenia S; Iandoli R; Santoro A; Vettoretto N; Coletta R; Morabito A
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Apr; 38(4):1667-1684. PubMed ID: 38332174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.