These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35935527)

  • 21. CSAR 2014: A Benchmark Exercise Using Unpublished Data from Pharma.
    Carlson HA; Smith RD; Damm-Ganamet KL; Stuckey JA; Ahmed A; Convery MA; Somers DO; Kranz M; Elkins PA; Cui G; Peishoff CE; Lambert MH; Dunbar JB
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1063-77. PubMed ID: 27149958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The CASP13-CAPRI targets as case studies to illustrate a novel scoring pipeline integrating CONSRANK with clustering and interface analyses.
    Barradas-Bautista D; Cao Z; Cavallo L; Oliva R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Sep; 21(Suppl 8):262. PubMed ID: 32938371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on an updated benchmark: 2. Evaluation methods and general results.
    Li Y; Han L; Liu Z; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jun; 54(6):1717-36. PubMed ID: 24708446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative Assessment of Seven Docking Programs on a Nonredundant Metalloprotein Subset of the PDBbind Refined.
    Çınaroğlu SS; Timuçin E
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Sep; 59(9):3846-3859. PubMed ID: 31460757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. AutoDock Vina 1.2.0: New Docking Methods, Expanded Force Field, and Python Bindings.
    Eberhardt J; Santos-Martins D; Tillack AF; Forli S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Aug; 61(8):3891-3898. PubMed ID: 34278794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Autodock Vina Adopts More Accurate Binding Poses but Autodock4 Forms Better Binding Affinity.
    Nguyen NT; Nguyen TH; Pham TNH; Huy NT; Bay MV; Pham MQ; Nam PC; Vu VV; Ngo ST
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Jan; 60(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 31887035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. CRDS: Consensus Reverse Docking System for target fishing.
    Lee A; Kim D
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Feb; 36(3):959-960. PubMed ID: 31432077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Protein-protein docking with multiple residue conformations and residue substitutions.
    Lorber DM; Udo MK; Shoichet BK
    Protein Sci; 2002 Jun; 11(6):1393-408. PubMed ID: 12021438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Identification of a minimal subset of receptor conformations for improved multiple conformation docking and two-step scoring.
    Yoon S; Welsh WJ
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 14741014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The antidepressant-sensitive dopamine transporter in Drosophila melanogaster: a primordial carrier for catecholamines.
    Pörzgen P; Park SK; Hirsh J; Sonders MS; Amara SG
    Mol Pharmacol; 2001 Jan; 59(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 11125028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Improving ligand-ranking of AutoDock Vina by changing the empirical parameters.
    Pham TNH; Nguyen TH; Tam NM; Y Vu T; Pham NT; Huy NT; Mai BK; Tung NT; Pham MQ; V Vu V; Ngo ST
    J Comput Chem; 2022 Jan; 43(3):160-169. PubMed ID: 34716930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Alternative to consensus scoring--a new approach toward the qualitative combination of docking algorithms.
    Wolf A; Zimmermann M; Hofmann-Apitius M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(3):1036-44. PubMed ID: 17492829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. AutoDock VinaXB: implementation of XBSF, new empirical halogen bond scoring function, into AutoDock Vina.
    Koebel MR; Schmadeke G; Posner RG; Sirimulla S
    J Cheminform; 2016; 8():27. PubMed ID: 27195023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The consequences of scoring docked ligand conformations using free energy correlations.
    Spyrakis F; Amadasi A; Fornabaio M; Abraham DJ; Mozzarelli A; Kellogg GE; Cozzini P
    Eur J Med Chem; 2007 Jul; 42(7):921-33. PubMed ID: 17346861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. ConsDock: A new program for the consensus analysis of protein-ligand interactions.
    Paul N; Rognan D
    Proteins; 2002 Jun; 47(4):521-33. PubMed ID: 12001231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cross-docking study on InhA inhibitors: a combination of Autodock Vina and PM6-DH2 simulations to retrieve bio-active conformations.
    Stigliani JL; Bernardes-Génisson V; Bernadou J; Pratviel G
    Org Biomol Chem; 2012 Aug; 10(31):6341-9. PubMed ID: 22751934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. LEADS-FRAG: A Benchmark Data Set for Assessment of Fragment Docking Performance.
    Chachulski L; Windshügel B
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Dec; 60(12):6544-6554. PubMed ID: 33289563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Chaos-embedded particle swarm optimization approach for protein-ligand docking and virtual screening.
    Tai HK; Jusoh SA; Siu SWI
    J Cheminform; 2018 Dec; 10(1):62. PubMed ID: 30552524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. istar: a web platform for large-scale protein-ligand docking.
    Li H; Leung KS; Ballester PJ; Wong MH
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e85678. PubMed ID: 24475049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. HarmonyDOCK: the structural analysis of poses in protein-ligand docking.
    Plewczynski D; Philips A; Von Grotthuss M; Rychlewski L; Ginalski K
    J Comput Biol; 2014 Mar; 21(3):247-56. PubMed ID: 21091053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.