These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35936262)

  • 1. Similar Attitudes, Different Strategies: A Limited Survey of the Discourse Strategies to Oppose Genetically Modified Organisms Conspiracy Theories by Chinese Scientist Communicators and Citizen Communicators on Zhihu.
    Yang Z
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():926098. PubMed ID: 35936262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Deconstruction of the discourse authority of scientists in Chinese online science communication: Investigation of citizen science communicators on Chinese knowledge sharing networks.
    Yang Z
    Public Underst Sci; 2021 Nov; 30(8):993-1007. PubMed ID: 33860703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Who should be a science communicator? The struggle for 'legitimate' status as science communicators between Chinese scientists and citizens on a Chinese knowledge-sharing platform.
    Yang Z
    Public Underst Sci; 2023 Apr; 32(3):357-372. PubMed ID: 36004385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Similarities and differences with the 'general public': Chinese civil servants' attitude to genetically modified organisms and its influencing factors.
    Yang Z; Liao D; Jia H
    GM Crops Food; 2023 Dec; 14(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 37707999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. GMO discussion on Twitter.
    Erokhin D; Komendantova N
    GM Crops Food; 2023 Dec; 14(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 37526069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chinese newspaper coverage of genetically modified organisms.
    Du L; Rachul C
    BMC Public Health; 2012 Jun; 12():326. PubMed ID: 22551150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selective and deceptive citation in the construction of dueling consensuses.
    Beers A; Nguyễn S; Starbird K; West JD; Spiro ES
    Sci Adv; 2023 Sep; 9(38):eadh1933. PubMed ID: 37738338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. RPC-Lex: A dictionary to measure German right-wing populist conspiracy discourse online.
    Puschmann C; Karakurt H; Amlinger C; Gess N; Nachtwey O
    Convergence (Lond); 2022 Aug; 28(4):1144-1171. PubMed ID: 36186680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Who wants to be a citizen scientist? Identifying the potential of citizen science and target segments in Switzerland.
    Füchslin T; Schäfer MS; Metag J
    Public Underst Sci; 2019 Aug; 28(6):652-668. PubMed ID: 31169062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Scientist Citizen and the Citizen Scientist: Blurring the Lines.
    Warmbrod L; Trotochaud M; Connell N
    ILAR J; 2019 Dec; 60(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 31886512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of Knowledge and Attitudes on Genetically Modified Foods Among Students Studying Life Sciences.
    Rathod D; Hedaoo RP
    Cureus; 2022 Dec; 14(12):e32744. PubMed ID: 36686112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How does Information Exposure Affect Public Attitudes Toward GMO in China? The mediating and moderating roles of Conspiracy Belief and Knowledge.
    Du Z; Xiao Y; Xu J
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():955541. PubMed ID: 36204765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contesting epistemic authority: Conspiracy theories on the boundaries of science.
    Harambam J; Aupers S
    Public Underst Sci; 2015 May; 24(4):466-80. PubMed ID: 25452381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conspiracy Theories, Trust in Science, and Knowledge during the Third Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Cyprus.
    Mousoulidou M; Siakalli M; Christodoulou A; Argyrides M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Sep; 20(17):. PubMed ID: 37681850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scientists vs laypeople: How genetically modified food is discussed on a Chinese Q&A website.
    Liang J; Liu X; Zhang W
    Public Underst Sci; 2019 Nov; 28(8):991-1004. PubMed ID: 31547775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Food to politics: Representations of genetically modified organisms in cartoons on the Internet in China.
    Wang G; Wang L; Shen J
    Public Underst Sci; 2021 Apr; 30(3):274-284. PubMed ID: 33401989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deconstruction of science hegemony: discursive strategies of Chinese science communication on genetically modified foods.
    Lin J
    GM Crops Food; 2023 Dec; 14(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 37598379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conspiracy theories in digital environments: Moving the research field forward.
    Zeng J; Schäfer MS; Oliveira TM
    Convergence (Lond); 2022 Aug; 28(4):929-939. PubMed ID: 36147519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scientific realism, scientific practice, and science communication: An empirical investigation of academics and science communicators.
    Pils R; Schoenegger P
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2024 Jun; 105():85-98. PubMed ID: 38754361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A systematic review of narrative interventions: Lessons for countering anti-vaccination conspiracy theories and misinformation.
    Lazić A; Žeželj I
    Public Underst Sci; 2021 Aug; 30(6):644-670. PubMed ID: 34006153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.