These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35937811)
1. Intrauterine Device Use: A New Frontier for Behavioral Neuroendocrinology. Beltz AM; Demidenko MI; Chaku N; Klump KL; Joseph JE Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2022; 13():853714. PubMed ID: 35937811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Women's satisfaction with birth control: a population survey of physical and psychological effects of oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices, condoms, natural family planning, and sterilization among 1466 women. Oddens BJ Contraception; 1999 May; 59(5):277-86. PubMed ID: 10494480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems (IUSs) versus other forms of reversible contraceptives as effective methods of preventing pregnancy. French R; Van Vliet H; Cowan F; Mansour D; Morris S; Hughes D; Robinson A; Proctor T; Summerbell C; Logan S; Helmerhorst F; Guillebaud J Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; 2004(3):CD001776. PubMed ID: 15266453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The end of IUD marketing in the United States: what does it mean for American women?]. Forrest JD Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1987 Mar; 15(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 12341479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reversible contraception for the woman over 35 years of age. Archer DF Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Dec; 4(6):891-6. PubMed ID: 1450355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Different contraceptive practices: use of contraceptives in Finland and other Nordic countries in the 1970s and 1980s. Makkonen K; Hemminki E Scand J Soc Med; 1991 Mar; 19(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 1925424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception. Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use-effectiveness of oral and intrauterine contraception. Tietze C; Lewitt S Fertil Steril; 1971 Aug; 22(8):508-13. PubMed ID: 5110233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved utilization of spacing methods--intrauterine devices (IUDs) and low-dose combined oral contraceptives (OCs)--through re-orientation training for improving quality of services. Indian Council of Medical Research Task Force on IUD and Hormonal Contraceptives. Contraception; 1994 Sep; 50(3):215-28. PubMed ID: 7805372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4). Black A; Guilbert E; ; Costescu D; Dunn S; Fisher W; Kives S; Mirosh M; Norman WV; Pymar H; Reid R; Roy G; Varto H; Waddington A; Wagner MS; Whelan AM; ; Ferguson C; Fortin C; Kielly M; Mansouri S; Todd N; J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2015 Oct; 37(10):936-42. PubMed ID: 26606712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems (IUSs), versus other forms of reversible contraceptives as effective methods of preventing pregnancy. French R; Cowan F; Mansour D; Morris S; Hughes D; Robinson A; Proctor T; Summerbell C; Logan S; Guillebaud J Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (2):CD001776. PubMed ID: 11406007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Choice of contraceptive modality by women in Norway. Skjeldestad FE Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1994 Jan; 73(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 8304025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The acceptability of current contraceptive methods to adolescents]. Sotnikova EI; Dubnitskaia LV; Perminova SG Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1993; (3):26-30. PubMed ID: 8048682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing methods of long-acting reversible contraception: A qualitative study of Delaware women's perceptions of intrauterine devices and the implant. Manzer JL; Berndt VK; Bell AV Contraception; 2022 Sep; 113():73-77. PubMed ID: 35417755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fertility after contraception or abortion. Huggins GR; Cullins VE Fertil Steril; 1990 Oct; 54(4):559-73. PubMed ID: 2209874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of prior pregnancy and combined oral contraceptives on baseline menstrual blood loss and bleeding response to intrauterine devices. Andrade AT; de Souza JP; Rowe PJ; Shaw ST Contraception; 1979 Jul; 20(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 477314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationship between contraceptive method and vaginal flora. Peddie BA; Bishop V; Bailey RR; McGill H Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1984 Aug; 24(3):217-8. PubMed ID: 6596089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acceptability of an experimental intracervical device: results of a study controlling for selection bias. Shain RN; Ratsula K; Toivonen J; Lähteenmäki P; Luukkainen T; Holden AE; Rosenthal M Contraception; 1989 Jan; 39(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 2491982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4). Black A; Guilbert E; ; Costescu D; Dunn S; Fisher W; Kives S; Mirosh M; Norman WV; Pymar H; Reid R; Roy G; Varto H; Waddington A; Wagner MS; Whelan AM; ; Ferguson C; Fortin C; Kielly M; Mansouri S; Todd N J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2015 Nov; 37(11):1033-9. PubMed ID: 26629725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characteristics of users of intrauterine devices and other reversible contraceptive methods in the United States. Xu X; Macaluso M; Frost J; Anderson JE; Curtis K; Grosse SD Fertil Steril; 2011 Nov; 96(5):1138-44. PubMed ID: 21917255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]