These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35938349)

  • 1. Patient-reported outcome measures compared to professional dental assessments of monolithic ZrO
    Gintaute A; Zitzmann NU; Brägger U; Weber K; Joda T
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Jan; 32(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 35938349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Time-efficiency and cost-analysis comparing three digital workflows for treatment with monolithic zirconia implant fixed dental prostheses: A double-blinded RCT.
    Joda T; Gintaute A; Brägger U; Ferrari M; Weber K; Zitzmann NU
    J Dent; 2021 Oct; 113():103779. PubMed ID: 34391875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Double-Blind Crossover RCT Analyzing Technical and Clinical Performance of Monolithic ZrO
    Gintaute A; Weber K; Zitzmann NU; Brägger U; Ferrari M; Joda T
    J Clin Med; 2021 Jun; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 34208773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) comparing digital and conventional workflows for treatment with posterior single-unit implant restorations: A randomized controlled trial.
    Kunavisarut C; Jarangkul W; Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri S; Joda T
    J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103875. PubMed ID: 34728252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The complete digital workflow in fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review.
    Joda T; Zarone F; Ferrari M
    BMC Oral Health; 2017 Sep; 17(1):124. PubMed ID: 28927393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Occlusal adjustment of 3-unit tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses fabricated with complete-digital and -analog workflows: A crossover clinical trial.
    Karasan D; Sailer I; Lee H; Demir F; Zarauz C; Akca K
    J Dent; 2023 Jan; 128():104365. PubMed ID: 36403691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Crown Accuracy and Time Efficiency of Cement-Retained Implant-Supported Restorations in a Complete Digital Workflow: A Randomized Control Trial.
    Ren S; Jiang X; Lin Y; Di P
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):405-411. PubMed ID: 34748653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Part I: Time efficiency of complete-arch digital scans versus conventional impressions.
    Sailer I; Mühlemann S; Fehmer V; Hämmerle CHF; Benic GI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 30017152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Different implant impression techniques for edentulous patients treated with CAD/CAM complete-arch prostheses: a randomised controlled trial reporting data at 3 year post-loading.
    Pozzi A; Tallarico M; Mangani F; Barlattani A
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(4):325-40. PubMed ID: 24570979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Randomized Clinical Trial comparing the clinical fit of CAD/CAM monolithic zirconia Fixed Dental Prostheses (FDP) on ti-base abutments based on digital or conventional impression techniques. One year follow-up.
    Derksen W; Tahmaseb A; Wismeijer D
    Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(6):733–743. PubMed ID: 33662051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Time-efficiency analysis of the treatment with monolithic implant crowns in a digital workflow: a randomized controlled trial.
    Joda T; Brägger U
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Nov; 27(11):1401-1406. PubMed ID: 27796072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The direct digital workflow in fixed implant prosthodontics: a narrative review.
    Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Kamposiora P; Papavasiliou G; Özcan M
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Jan; 21(1):37. PubMed ID: 33478459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A clinical study comparing digital scanning and conventional impression making for implant-supported prostheses: A crossover clinical trial.
    Lee SJ; Jamjoom FZ; Le T; Radics A; Gallucci GO
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jul; 128(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 33602542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomized Clinical Trial comparing clinical adjustment times of CAD/CAM screw-retained posterior crowns on ti-base abutments created with digital or conventional impressions. One-year follow-up.
    Derksen W; Tahmaseb A; Wismeijer D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Aug; 32(8):962-970. PubMed ID: 34080238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) of posterior single-implant crowns using digital workflows: A randomized controlled trial with a three-year follow-up.
    Joda T; Ferrari M; Bragger U; Zitzmann NU
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Sep; 29(9):954-961. PubMed ID: 30144159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of digital and silicone impressions for single-tooth implants and two- and three-unit implants for a free-end edentulous saddle.
    Nagata K; Fuchigami K; Okuhama Y; Wakamori K; Tsuruoka H; Nakashizu T; Hoshi N; Atsumi M; Kimoto K; Kawana H
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Sep; 21(1):464. PubMed ID: 34556111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Time-Efficiency Analysis Comparing Digital and Conventional Workflows for Implant Crowns: A Prospective Clinical Crossover Trial.
    Joda T; Brägger U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(5):1047-53. PubMed ID: 26394340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part III: marginal and internal fit.
    Zeltner M; Sailer I; Mühlemann S; Özcan M; Hämmerle CH; Benic GI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):354-362. PubMed ID: 27677220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Time efficiency and quality of outcomes in a model-free digital workflow using digital impression immediately after implant placement: A double-blind self-controlled clinical trial.
    Pan S; Guo D; Zhou Y; Jung RE; Hämmerle CHF; Mühlemann S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Jul; 30(7):617-626. PubMed ID: 31021451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital workflow in full-arch implant rehabilitation with segmented minimally veneered monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: 2-year clinical follow-up.
    Papaspyridakos P; Kang K; DeFuria C; Amin S; Kudara Y; Weber HP
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2018 Jan; 30(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 28792115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.