160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3593909)
1. The amniocentesis decision: ten years of decision analytic experience.
Pauker SP; Pauker SG
Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser; 1987; 23(2):151-69. PubMed ID: 3593909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prescriptive models to support decision making in genetics.
Pauker SG; Pauker SP
Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser; 1987; 23(2):279-96. PubMed ID: 3593912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The amniocentesis decision: an explicit guide for parents.
Pauker SP; Pauker SG
Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser; 1979; 15(5C):289-324. PubMed ID: 160805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Experiments on genetic risk perception and decision making: explorative studies.
d'Ydewalle G; Evers-Kiebooms G
Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser; 1987; 23(2):209-25. PubMed ID: 2954593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors affecting the decision regarding amniocentesis in women at genetic risk because of age 35 years or older.
Vergani P; Locatelli A; Biffi A; Ciriello E; Zagarella A; Pezzullo JC; Ghidini A
Prenat Diagn; 2002 Sep; 22(9):769-74. PubMed ID: 12224068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Psychosocial aspects of the decision to utilize prenatal diagnosis--results of an empirical study].
Scholz C; Endres M; Zach K; Murken J
Offentl Gesundheitswes; 1989 Jun; 51(6):278-84. PubMed ID: 2526936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Representing risks: supporting genetic counseling.
Humphreys P; Berkeley D
Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser; 1987; 23(2):227-50. PubMed ID: 3297182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A conceptual explanation of risk-reduction behavior and intervention development.
Cox CL; Sullivan JA; Roghmann KJ
Nurs Res; 1984; 33(3):168-73. PubMed ID: 6563535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of genetic counseling on decisions of pregnant women aged 35 years or over regarding amniocentesis in Turkey.
Ilgin-Ruhi H; Yürür-Kutlay N; Tükün A; Bökesoy I
Eur J Med Genet; 2005; 48(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 15953401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of diagnostic uncertainty and available options on perceptions of risk.
Black RB
Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser; 1979; 15(5C):341-54. PubMed ID: 160806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors in a woman's decision to undergo genetic amniocentesis for advanced maternal age.
Davies BL; Doran TA
Nurs Res; 1982; 31(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 6214766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The routine and the traumatic in prenatal genetic diagnosis: does clinical information inform patient decision-making?
Hunt LM; de Voogd KB; Castañeda H
Patient Educ Couns; 2005 Mar; 56(3):302-12. PubMed ID: 15721973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ethical issues in amniocentesis and abortion.
McCormick TR
Tex Rep Biol Med; 1974; 32(1):299-309. PubMed ID: 4418247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An evaluation of the decision-making process regarding amniocentesis following a screen-positive maternal serum screen result.
Kobelka C; Mattman A; Langlois S
Prenat Diagn; 2009 May; 29(5):514-9. PubMed ID: 19242922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prenatal genetic counseling.
Jackson LG
Prim Care; 1976 Dec; 3(4):701-16. PubMed ID: 1051521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Changing their minds with time: a comparison of hypothetical and actual reproductive behaviors in parents of children with cystic fibrosis.
Sawyer SM; Cerritelli B; Carter LS; Cooke M; Glazner JA; Massie J
Pediatrics; 2006 Sep; 118(3):e649-56. PubMed ID: 16950956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prenatal diagnosis: a directive approach to genetic counseling using decision analysis.
Pauker SP; Pauker SG
Yale J Biol Med; 1977; 50(3):275-89. PubMed ID: 142379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Uptake of invasive prenatal diagnostic tests in women after detection of soft markers for chromosomal abnormality on ultrasonographic evaluation.
Sharda S; Phadke SR
J Perinatol; 2007 Sep; 27(9):550-5. PubMed ID: 17611609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Attitudes toward prenatal genetic testing in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.
Kastrinos F; Stoffel EM; Balmaña J; Syngal S
Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Jun; 102(6):1284-90. PubMed ID: 17355417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating decision aiding technologies for genetic counseling.
Pitz GF
Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser; 1987; 23(2):251-78. PubMed ID: 3593911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
