These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35939657)

  • 21. Management system for engineering and decoration waste: An exploratory study in Shenzhen.
    Li Z; Deng Q; Bai J; Li Y; Wang Y; Liu N; Gong Y
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Jul; 314():115085. PubMed ID: 35462254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cigarette Waste in Popular Beaches in Thailand: High Densities that Demand Environmental Action.
    Kungskulniti N; Charoenca N; Hamann SL; Pitayarangsarit S; Mock J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Mar; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 29596385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sustainable multi-trip periodic redesign-routing model for municipal solid waste collection network: the case study of Tehran.
    Mahdavi L; Mansour S; Sajadieh MS
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 May; 29(24):35944-35963. PubMed ID: 35061178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Landfill site selection using spatial information technologies and AHP: a case study in Beijing, China.
    Wang G; Qin L; Li G; Chen L
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jun; 90(8):2414-21. PubMed ID: 19375842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Pareto frontier analyses based decision making tool for transportation of hazardous waste.
    Das A; Mazumder TN; Gupta AK
    J Hazard Mater; 2012 Aug; 227-228():341-52. PubMed ID: 22673061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A web-based Decision Support System for the optimal management of construction and demolition waste.
    Banias G; Achillas Ch; Vlachokostas Ch; Moussiopoulos N; Papaioannou I
    Waste Manag; 2011 Dec; 31(12):2497-502. PubMed ID: 21835602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Household hazardous wastes as a potential source of pollution: a generation study.
    Ojeda-Benítez S; Aguilar-Virgen Q; Taboada-González P; Cruz-Sotelo SE
    Waste Manag Res; 2013 Dec; 31(12):1279-84. PubMed ID: 24293231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Selection of infectious medical waste disposal firms by using the analytic hierarchy process and sensitivity analysis.
    Hsu PF; Wu CR; Li YT
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(8):1386-94. PubMed ID: 17689065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Using an innovative criteria weighting tool for stakeholders involvement to rank MSW facility sites with the AHP.
    De Feo G; De Gisi S
    Waste Manag; 2010 Nov; 30(11):2370-82. PubMed ID: 20444589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Hazardous waste management system design under population and environmental impact considerations.
    Yilmaz O; Kara BY; Yetis U
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Dec; 203(Pt 2):720-731. PubMed ID: 27372736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Optimizing locations of waste transfer stations in rural areas.
    Chen Y; Lai Z; Wang Z; Yang D; Wu L
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0250962. PubMed ID: 34019590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Using MCDA and GIS for hazardous waste landfill siting considering land scarcity for waste disposal.
    De Feo G; De Gisi S
    Waste Manag; 2014 Nov; 34(11):2225-38. PubMed ID: 25002369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Development and application of the decision support system for municipal solid waste management in central Taiwan.
    Chang YJ; Lin MD
    Waste Manag Res; 2013 May; 31(5):435-46. PubMed ID: 23444151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluating and prioritizing the healthcare waste disposal center locations using a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making method.
    Beheshtinia MA; Bahrami F; Fathi M; Asadi S
    Sci Rep; 2023 Sep; 13(1):15130. PubMed ID: 37704751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Environmental-benefit analysis of two urban waste collection systems.
    Aranda Usón A; Ferreira G; Zambrana Vásquez D; Zabalza Bribián I; Llera Sastresa E
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Oct; 463-464():72-7. PubMed ID: 23792249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Multi-objective reverse logistics model for integrated computer waste management.
    Ahluwalia PK; Nema AK
    Waste Manag Res; 2006 Dec; 24(6):514-27. PubMed ID: 17252998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Efficiency Assessment of Hazardous Waste Disposal in EU Countries: A Three-Stage Super-Efficiency Data Envelopment Analysis Model.
    Ye M; Liang X; Lin S; Lin H; Deng F
    Environ Manage; 2022 Oct; 70(4):650-665. PubMed ID: 35907030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Optimization of municipal solid waste transportation by integrating GIS analysis, equation-based, and agent-based model.
    Nguyen-Trong K; Nguyen-Thi-Ngoc A; Nguyen-Ngoc D; Dinh-Thi-Hai V
    Waste Manag; 2017 Jan; 59():14-22. PubMed ID: 27836518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. RFID technology for hazardous waste management and tracking.
    Namen AA; Brasil Fda C; Abrunhosa JJ; Abrunhosa GG; Tarré RM; Marques FJ
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Sep; 32(9 Suppl):59-66. PubMed ID: 24879751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A system dynamics model to evaluate effects of source separation of municipal solid waste management: A case of Bangkok, Thailand.
    Sukholthaman P; Sharp A
    Waste Manag; 2016 Jun; 52():50-61. PubMed ID: 27026497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.