These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35939670)

  • 1. Impactful scientists have higher tendency to involve collaborators in new topics.
    Zeng A; Fan Y; Di Z; Wang Y; Havlin S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Aug; 119(33):e2207436119. PubMed ID: 35939670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Facebook for scientists: requirements and services for optimizing how scientific collaborations are established.
    Schleyer T; Spallek H; Butler BS; Subramanian S; Weiss D; Poythress ML; Rattanathikun P; Mueller G
    J Med Internet Res; 2008 Aug; 10(3):e24. PubMed ID: 18701421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attack resilience of the evolving scientific collaboration network.
    Liu XF; Xu XK; Small M; Tse CK
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(10):e26271. PubMed ID: 22022586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integration by Parts: Collaboration and Topic Structure in the CogSci Community.
    DeStefano I; Oey LA; Brockbank E; Vul E
    Top Cogn Sci; 2021 Apr; 13(2):399-413. PubMed ID: 33742776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Collaboration and topic switches in science.
    Venturini S; Sikdar S; Rinaldi F; Tudisco F; Fortunato S
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):1258. PubMed ID: 38218965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does increased interdisciplinary contact among hard and social scientists help or hinder interdisciplinary research?
    Urbanska K; Huet S; Guimond S
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0221907. PubMed ID: 31483810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reflections on scientific collaboration between basic researchers and clinicians.
    Muia J; Casari C
    J Thromb Haemost; 2016 Oct; 14(10):1905-1907. PubMed ID: 27515008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Great minds think alike, or do they often differ? Research topic overlap and the formation of scientific teams.
    Smith TB; Vacca R; Krenz T; McCarty C
    J Informetr; 2021 Feb; 15(1):. PubMed ID: 33343689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The collaborative effect of scientific meetings: A study of the International Milk Genomics Consortium.
    Kwok E; Porter M; Korf I; Pasin G; German JB; Lemay DG
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0201637. PubMed ID: 30133459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Journey across the disciplines: a foundation for scientific communication in bioastronomy.
    Offerdahl EG; Morrow CA; Prather EE; Slater TF
    Astrobiology; 2005 Oct; 5(5):651-7. PubMed ID: 16225437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gender differences in scientific collaborations: Women are more egalitarian than men.
    Araújo EB; Araújo NAM; Moreira AA; Herrmann HJ; Andrade JS
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0176791. PubMed ID: 28489872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).
    Foffi G; Pastore A; Piazza F; Temussi PA
    Phys Biol; 2013 Aug; 10(4):040301. PubMed ID: 23912807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Research on Biodiversity and Climate Change at a Distance: Collaboration Networks between Europe and Latin America and the Caribbean.
    Dangles O; Loirat J; Freour C; Serre S; Vacher J; Le Roux X
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157441. PubMed ID: 27304924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The structure of scientific collaboration networks.
    Newman ME
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2001 Jan; 98(2):404-9. PubMed ID: 11149952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Out of the fog: Catalyzing integrative capacity in interdisciplinary research.
    Piso Z; O'Rourke M; Weathers KC
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2016 Apr; 56():84-94. PubMed ID: 27083087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Concept similarity in publications precedes cross-disciplinary collaboration.
    Post AR; Harrison JH
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2008 Nov; 2008():606-10. PubMed ID: 18999254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Collaboration networks from a large CV database: dynamics, topology and bonus impact.
    Araújo EB; Moreira AA; Furtado V; Pequeno TH; Andrade JS
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e90537. PubMed ID: 24603470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences in Collaboration Patterns across Discipline, Career Stage, and Gender.
    Zeng XH; Duch J; Sales-Pardo M; Moreira JA; Radicchi F; Ribeiro HV; Woodruff TK; Amaral LA
    PLoS Biol; 2016 Nov; 14(11):e1002573. PubMed ID: 27814355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nanotechnology researchers' collaboration relationships: a gender analysis of access to scientific information.
    Villanueva-Felez A; Woolley R; Cañibano C
    Soc Stud Sci; 2015 Feb; 45(1):100-29. PubMed ID: 25803919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.