These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35939793)

  • 1. Narrow-Diameter Implants for Partial Fixed and Removable Prostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Badaró MM; Herdt B; Bezerra AP; Schimmel M; Vega Gonçalves TMS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(6):738–751. PubMed ID: 35939793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Narrow-diameter implants in the anterior region: A meta-analysis.
    Parize HN; Bohner LOL; Gama LT; Porporatti AL; Mezzomo LAM; Martin WC; Gonçalves TMSV
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(6):1347–1358. PubMed ID: 30934032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Clinical Performance of Narrow Diameter Implants Versus Regular Diameter Implants: A Meta-Analysis.
    Ma M; Qi M; Zhang D; Liu H
    J Oral Implantol; 2019 Dec; 45(6):503-508. PubMed ID: 31536434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Narrow- (3.0 mm) Versus Standard-Diameter (4.0 and 4.5 mm) Implants for Splinted Partial Fixed Restoration of Posterior Mandibular and Maxillary Jaws: A 5-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Pieri F; Forlivesi C; Caselli E; Corinaldesi G
    J Periodontol; 2017 Apr; 88(4):338-347. PubMed ID: 27858554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Narrow- and regular-diameter implants in the posterior region of the jaws to support single crowns: A 3-year split-mouth randomized clinical trial.
    de Souza AB; Sukekava F; Tolentino L; César-Neto JB; Garcez-Filho J; Araújo MG
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jan; 29(1):100-107. PubMed ID: 28994192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of 316 narrow diameter implants followed for 5-10 years: a clinical and radiographic retrospective study.
    Arisan V; Bölükbaşi N; Ersanli S; Ozdemir T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Mar; 21(3):296-307. PubMed ID: 20443792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk factors and reoperative survival rate of failed narrow-diameter implants in the maxillary anterior region.
    Yang G; Chen L; Gao Y; Liu H; Dong H; Mou Y
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Feb; 22(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 31797552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Narrow-diameter implants versus regular-diameter implants for rehabilitation of the anterior region: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Cruz RS; Lemos CAA; de Batista VES; Yogui FC; Oliveira HFF; Verri FR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 May; 50(5):674-682. PubMed ID: 33158693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal bone loss and the risk indicators of fixed screw-retained implant-supported prostheses and fixed telescopic-retained implant-supported prostheses in full arch: A retrospective case-control study.
    Oda Y; Mori G; Honma S; Ito T; Iijima T; Yajima Y
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Jul; 32(7):818-827. PubMed ID: 33754378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Narrow diameter titanium-zirconium tissue-level implants supporting multi-unit FDPs in the anterior area: A 5-year prospective study.
    Altuna P; Fernández-Villar S; Barroso-Panella A; Ortiz-Puigpelat O; Hernández-Alfaro F; Nart J
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Jul; 34(7):751-767. PubMed ID: 37232220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bone level changes at implants supporting crowns or fixed partial dentures with or without cantilevers.
    Hälg GA; Schmid J; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):983-90. PubMed ID: 18828813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retrospective study on the clinical outcomes of small-diameter implants supporting fixed prostheses without bone augmentation in the posterior region after 2 to 12 years.
    Si M; Zhang Y; Li J; He F
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Jun; 21(3):454-461. PubMed ID: 31025491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-Term Follow-Up of 2.5-mm Narrow-Diameter Implants Supporting a Fixed Prostheses.
    Anitua E; Saracho J; Begoña L; Alkhraisat MH
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2016 Aug; 18(4):769-77. PubMed ID: 25913652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Influence of Prosthesis Design on the Outcomes of Tooth Implants Immediately Placed and Loaded by Means of One-Piece Titanium Machined Restoration.
    Toti P; Marconcini S; Enrica G; Pedretti G; Barone A; Covani U
    J Oral Implantol; 2018 Apr; 44(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 29182488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical outcomes of titanium-zirconium alloy narrow-diameter implants for single-crown restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Cao R; Chen B; Xu H; Fan Z
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Jul; 61(6):403-410. PubMed ID: 37331853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Less Invasive Surgical Procedures Using Narrow-Diameter Implants: A Prospective Study in 20 Consecutive Patients.
    Lambert FE; Lecloux G; Grenade C; Bouhy A; Lamy M; Rompen EH
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Dec; 41(6):693-9. PubMed ID: 24766161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical outcome of narrow diameter implants: a retrospective study of 510 implants.
    Degidi M; Piattelli A; Carinci F
    J Periodontol; 2008 Jan; 79(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 18166092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of survival rate and crestal bone loss of narrow diameter dental implants versus regular dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Alrabiah M
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2019 Feb; 10(1):e12367. PubMed ID: 30414262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fiber-reinforced composite partial fixed dental prostheses supported by short or extra-short implants: A 10 year retrospective study.
    Cheng YC; Bergamo ETP; Murcko L; Hirayama M; Perpetuini P; Speratti D; Bonfante EA
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Dec; 24(6):854-861. PubMed ID: 36205843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of Implant Number on Mandibular Implant-Supported Profile Prostheses: A Systematic Review.
    Lima LB; de Freitas NR; Novais VR; Simamoto Júnior PC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):795-807. PubMed ID: 30024995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.