These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35940957)

  • 21. Biases of spatial attention in vision and audition.
    Sosa Y; Teder-Sälejärvi WA; McCourt ME
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 20566234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bisection of shapes and lines: analysis of the visual and motor aspects of pseudoneglect.
    Macdonald-Nethercott EM; Kinnear PR; Venneri A
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Aug; 91(1):217-26. PubMed ID: 11011891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hemispheric dominance for visuospatial attention does not predict the direction of pseudoneglect.
    Gerrits R; Verhelst H; Vingerhoets G
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Nov; 148():107634. PubMed ID: 32998020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cognitive and perceptual influences on visual line bisection: psychophysical and chronometric analyses of pseudoneglect.
    McCourt ME; Olafson C
    Neuropsychologia; 1997 Mar; 35(3):369-80. PubMed ID: 9051685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prism adaptation magnitude has differential influences on perceptual versus manual responses.
    Striemer CL; Russell K; Nath P
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 234(10):2761-72. PubMed ID: 27206500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Eye dominance modulates visuospatial attention.
    Schintu S; Chaumillon R; Guillaume A; Salemme R; Reilly KT; Pisella L; Farnè A
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Apr; 141():107314. PubMed ID: 31870684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Performance consistency of normal observers in forced-choice tachistoscopic visual line bisection.
    McCourt ME
    Neuropsychologia; 2001; 39(10):1065-76. PubMed ID: 11440759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Pseudoneglect in line bisection judgement is associated with a modulation of right hemispheric spatial attention dominance in right-handers.
    Zago L; Petit L; Jobard G; Hay J; Mazoyer B; Tzourio-Mazoyer N; Karnath HO; Mellet E
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 94():75-83. PubMed ID: 27916670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Weight and see: Line bisection in neglect reliably measures the allocation of attention, but not the perception of length.
    McIntosh RD; Ietswaart M; Milner AD
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Nov; 106():146-158. PubMed ID: 28923304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Space representation in children with dyslexia and children without dyslexia: contribution of line bisection and circle centering tasks.
    Vieira S; Quercia P; Bonnetblanc F; Michel C
    Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Nov; 34(11):3997-4008. PubMed ID: 24036389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Representational pseudoneglect in line bisection.
    Darling S; Logie RH; Della Sala S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Oct; 19(5):879-83. PubMed ID: 22692959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The orienting response drives pseudoneglect-Evidence from an objective pupillometric method.
    Strauch C; Romein C; Naber M; Van der Stigchel S; Ten Brink AF
    Cortex; 2022 Jun; 151():259-271. PubMed ID: 35462203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Time-on-task effect in pseudoneglect.
    Dufour A; Touzalin P; Candas V
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 176(3):532-7. PubMed ID: 17146643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A reassessment of the pseudoneglect effect: Attention allocation systems are selectively engaged by semantic and spatial processing.
    Gray OJ; McFarquhar M; Montaldi D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Feb; 47(2):223-237. PubMed ID: 33271044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Age-related changes in the allocation of spatially directed focal attention.
    Mańkowska A; Heilman KM; Williamson JB; Michałowski J; Harciarek M
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2020 Sep; 27(5):748-764. PubMed ID: 31610738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pseudoneglect in solid-line versus character-line bisection tasks: a test for attention dominance theory.
    Lee BH; Kim M; Kang SJ; Park KC; Kim EJ; Adair JC; Na DL
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2004 Sep; 17(3):174-8. PubMed ID: 15536305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A disassociation between physical and mental number bisection in developmental dyscalculia.
    Ashkenazi S; Henik A
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Aug; 48(10):2861-8. PubMed ID: 20594996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Right-lateralised lane keeping in young and older British drivers.
    Learmonth G; Märker G; McBride N; Pellinen P; Harvey M
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203549. PubMed ID: 30188952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A critical review and meta-analysis of the perceptual pseudoneglect across psychiatric disorders: is there a continuum?
    Ribolsi M; Di Lorenzo G; Lisi G; Niolu C; Siracusano A
    Cogn Process; 2015 Feb; 16(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 25377236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of baseline directional differences in pseudoneglect on distractibility.
    Thomas NA; Aniulis E; Nicholls MER
    Cortex; 2016 Apr; 77():69-83. PubMed ID: 26922505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.