260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35941257)
1. A comparative analysis of three multi-criteria decision-making methods for land suitability assessment.
Rashidi F; Sharifian S
Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Aug; 194(9):657. PubMed ID: 35941257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prioritization of water erosion-prone sub-watersheds using three ensemble methods in Qareaghaj catchment, southern Iran.
Pourghasemi HR; Honarmandnejad F; Rezaei M; Tarazkar MH; Sadhasivam N
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Jul; 28(28):37894-37917. PubMed ID: 33723776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. AHP and TOPSIS based flood risk assessment- a case study of the Navsari City, Gujarat, India.
Pathan AI; Girish Agnihotri P; Said S; Patel D
Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Jun; 194(7):509. PubMed ID: 35713716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combined Fuzzy AHP-GIS for Agricultural Land Suitability Modeling for a Watershed in Southern Iran.
Tashayo B; Honarbakhsh A; Azma A; Akbari M
Environ Manage; 2020 Sep; 66(3):364-376. PubMed ID: 32533327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Landfill site selection via integrating multi-criteria decision techniques with geographic information systems: a case study in Naqadeh, Iran.
Khorsandi H; Faramarzi A; Aghapour AA; Jafari SJ
Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Nov; 191(12):730. PubMed ID: 31705330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combination of fuzzy-AHP and GIS techniques in land suitability assessment for wheat (
Kılıc OM; Ersayın K; Gunal H; Khalofah A; Alsubeie MS
Saudi J Biol Sci; 2022 Apr; 29(4):2634-2644. PubMed ID: 35531232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fuzzy-based models' performance on qualitative and quantitative land suitability evaluation for cotton cultivation in Sarayan County, South Khorasan Province, Iran.
Vahidi MJ; Behdani MA; Servati M; Naderi M
Environ Monit Assess; 2023 Mar; 195(4):488. PubMed ID: 36939935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An Integrated Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach to Assess Sustainable Urban Development in an Emerging Economy.
Dang VT; Wang J; Van-Thac Dang W
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Aug; 16(16):. PubMed ID: 31412685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Land capability assessment of Sali watershed for agricultural suitability using a multi-criteria-based decision-making approach.
Dutta A; Banerjee M; Ray R
Environ Monit Assess; 2024 Feb; 196(3):237. PubMed ID: 38316645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sanitary landfill site selection by integrating AHP and FTOPSIS with GIS: a case study of Memari Municipality, India.
Ali SA; Parvin F; Al-Ansari N; Pham QB; Ahmad A; Raj MS; Anh DT; Ba LH; Thai VN
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Feb; 28(6):7528-7550. PubMed ID: 33034852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Landfill site selection by integrating fuzzy logic, AHP, and WLC method based on multi-criteria decision analysis.
Zarin R; Azmat M; Naqvi SR; Saddique Q; Ullah S
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Apr; 28(16):19726-19741. PubMed ID: 33410005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating lecturer performance in Vietnam: An application of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods.
Do QH; Tran VT; Tran TT
Heliyon; 2024 Jun; 10(11):e30772. PubMed ID: 38933935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Integrated assessment of groundwater potential zones and artificial recharge sites using GIS and Fuzzy-AHP: a case study in Peddavagu watershed, India.
Shekar PR; Mathew A
Environ Monit Assess; 2023 Jun; 195(7):906. PubMed ID: 37382701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Land evaluation approaches comparing TOPSIS and SAW with parametric methods for rice cultivation.
Azadi A; Jalali AS; Navidi MN
Environ Monit Assess; 2023 Oct; 195(11):1296. PubMed ID: 37821796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Novel Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Building Material Supplier Selection Based on Entropy-AHP Weighted TOPSIS.
Chen CH
Entropy (Basel); 2020 Feb; 22(2):. PubMed ID: 33286032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of an integrated multi-criteria decision making AHP-TOPSIS methodology for ETL software selection.
Hanine M; Boutkhoum O; Tikniouine A; Agouti T
Springerplus; 2016; 5():263. PubMed ID: 27006872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determination of the most appropriate fertilizing method for apple trees using multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches.
Heidarisoltanabadi M; Elhami B; Imanmehr A; Khadivi A
Food Sci Nutr; 2024 Feb; 12(2):1158-1169. PubMed ID: 38370082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Landfill site selection using a hybrid system of AHP-Fuzzy in GIS environment: A case study in Shiraz city, Iran.
Pasalari H; Nodehi RN; Mahvi AH; Yaghmaeian K; Charrahi Z
MethodsX; 2019; 6():1454-1466. PubMed ID: 31289723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determining and forecasting drought susceptibility in southwestern Iran using multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) coupled with CA-Markov model.
Mokarram M; Pourghasemi HR; Hu M; Zhang H
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Aug; 781():146703. PubMed ID: 33798887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Groundwater spring potential zonation using AHP and fuzzy-AHP in Eastern Himalayan region: Papum Pare district, Arunachal Pradesh, India.
Ranjan P; Pandey PK; Pandey V
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Feb; 31(7):10317-10333. PubMed ID: 37012568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
