204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35941596)
1. Evaluation of associations between condylar morphology, ramus height, and mandibular plane angle in various vertical skeletal patterns: a digital radiographic study.
Türker G; Öztürk Yaşar M
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Aug; 22(1):330. PubMed ID: 35941596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 3D analysis of maxillomandibular morphology in hyperdivergent and hypodivergent individuals: A cross-sectional study.
Reis AS; Copello FM; de Castro ACR; Cevidanes LHS; do Rego MV; Visconti MA; Ruellas ACO
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 Nov; 26(4):687-694. PubMed ID: 37246594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mandibular ramus height and condyle distance asymmetries in individuals with different facial growth patterns: a cone-beam computed tomography study.
Lemes CR; Tozzi CF; Gribel S; Gribel BF; Venezian GC; do Carmo Menezes C; Custodio W
Surg Radiol Anat; 2021 Feb; 43(2):267-274. PubMed ID: 32965519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Condylar and ramal vertical asymmetry in adolescent patients with cleft lip and palate evaluated with cone-beam computed tomography.
Celikoglu M; Halicioglu K; Buyuk SK; Sekerci AE; Ucar FI
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):691-7. PubMed ID: 24182585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mandibular vertical asymmetry in adult orthodontic patients with different vertical growth patterns: A cone beam computed tomography study.
Celik S; Celikoglu M; Buyuk SK; Sekerci AE
Angle Orthod; 2016 Mar; 86(2):271-7. PubMed ID: 26065465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A novel measurement method for the morphology of the mandibular ramus using homologous modelling.
Inoue K; Nakano H; Sumida T; Yamada T; Otawa N; Fukuda N; Nakajima Y; Kumamaru W; Mishima K; Kouchi M; Takahashi I; Mori Y
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(8):20150062. PubMed ID: 26143939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cone-beam computed tomography study of mandibular morphology and tooth compensation in asymmetrical patients.
Marques FBC; Siqueira de Lima L; Coqueiro RDS; Pithon MM; Ruellas ACO; Maciel JVB; Nojima MDCG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Aug; 164(2):265-275. PubMed ID: 36967314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Condylar and ramal vertical asymmetry in unilateral and bilateral posterior crossbite patients and a normal occlusion sample.
Uysal T; Sisman Y; Kurt G; Ramoglu SI
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 19577146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An evaluation of condylar and ramal vertical asymmetry in adolescents with unilateral and bilateral posterior crossbite using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Halicioglu K; Celikoglu M; Yavuz I; Sekerci AE; Buyuk SK
Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 24968641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of condylar morphology following orthognathic surgery on digital panoramic radiographs. Could methodology influence the range of "normality" in condylar changes?
Scolozzi P; Momjian A; Courvoisier DS; Kiliaridis S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(7):20120463. PubMed ID: 23625066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vertical asymmetry of the mandibular ramus and condylar heights measured with a new method from dental panoramic radiographs in patients with psoriatic arthritis.
Mattila M; Könönen M; Mattila K
J Oral Rehabil; 1995 Oct; 22(10):741-5. PubMed ID: 8606331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Radiographic cephalometry analysis of dimensions of condylar processus in persons with mandibular prognathism].
Cutović T; Pavlović J; Kozomara R
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2008 Jul; 65(7):513-9. PubMed ID: 18700460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of condylar size among different anteroposterior and vertical skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography.
Hasebe A; Yamaguchi T; Nakawaki T; Hikita Y; Katayama K; Maki K
Angle Orthod; 2019 Mar; 89(2):306-311. PubMed ID: 30475648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gonial angles and condylar and ramus height of the mandible in complete denture wearers--a panoramic radiograph study.
Raustia AM; Salonen MA
J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Jul; 24(7):512-6. PubMed ID: 9250838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of sagittal maxillary growth hypoplasia severity on mandibular asymmetry in unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects.
Jena AK; Singh SP; Utreja AK
Angle Orthod; 2011 Sep; 81(5):872-7. PubMed ID: 21341999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Verification of the symmetry of the mandibular ramus in patients with temporomandibular disorders and asymptomatic individuals: a comparative study.
Luz JG; Miyazaki LT; Rodrigues L
Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol; 2002; 44(3):83-7. PubMed ID: 12784583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of early bilateral mandibular first molar extraction on condylar and ramal vertical asymmetry.
Halicioglu K; Celikoglu M; Caglaroglu M; Buyuk SK; Akkas I; Sekerci AE
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jul; 17(6):1557-61. PubMed ID: 23001188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Musculomandibular morphology in individuals with different vertical skeletal growth patterns: an MRI and cone beam computed tomography study.
Gardovska K; Urtane I; Krumina G
Stomatologija; 2020; 22(4):99-106. PubMed ID: 33847281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The condylar asymmetry measurements in different skeletal patterns.
Sağlam AM
J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Jul; 30(7):738-42. PubMed ID: 12791161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Osseous changes of the mandibular condyle affect backward-rotation of the mandibular ramus in Angle Class II orthodontic patients with idiopathic condylar resorption of the temporomandibular joint.
Kajii TS; Fujita T; Sakaguchi Y; Shimada K
Cranio; 2019 Jul; 37(4):264-271. PubMed ID: 29359644
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
