These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35942807)

  • 1. Revisiting Auditory Profiling: Can Cognitive Factors Improve the Prediction of Aided Speech-in-Noise Outcome?
    Wu M; Christiansen S; Fereczkowski M; Neher T
    Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221113889. PubMed ID: 35942807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of Three Auditory Profiles on Aided Speech Perception in Different Noise Scenarios.
    Wu M; Cañete OM; Schmidt JH; Fereczkowski M; Neher T
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211023709. PubMed ID: 34184946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigating the Effects of Four Auditory Profiles on Speech Recognition, Overall Quality, and Noise Annoyance With Simulated Hearing-Aid Processing Strategies.
    Wu M; Sanchez-Lopez R; El-Haj-Ali M; Nielsen SG; Fereczkowski M; Dau T; Santurette S; Neher T
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520960861. PubMed ID: 33073727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory Distraction and Acclimatization to Hearing Aids.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):174-183. PubMed ID: 27564230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ?
    Mirkovic B; Debener S; Schmidt J; Jaeger M; Neher T
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
    Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of a Remote Microphone System with Tri-Microphone Beamformer.
    Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L; Battles J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 31429403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Strategies of hearing aids fitting for improving speech recognition in noisy environments].
    Boboshko MY; Berdnikova IP; Korotkov YV; Maltseva NV
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2021; 86(2):28-32. PubMed ID: 33929148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relative contributions of auditory and cognitive functions on speech recognition in quiet and in noise among older adults.
    Mukari SZMS; Yusof Y; Ishak WS; Maamor N; Chellapan K; Dzulkifli MA
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2020; 86(2):149-156. PubMed ID: 30558985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing speech recognition abilities with digits in noise in cochlear implant and hearing aid users.
    Kaandorp MW; Smits C; Merkus P; Goverts ST; Festen JM
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jan; 54(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 25156097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Directional Processing and Noise Reduction in Hearing Aids: Individual and Situational Influences on Preferred Setting.
    Neher T; Wagener KC; Fischer RL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Sep; 27(8):628-46. PubMed ID: 27564441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial separation benefit for unaided and aided listening.
    Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):72-85. PubMed ID: 24121648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of hearing aid algorithms using a master hearing aid: the influence of hearing aid experience on the relationship between speech recognition and cognitive capacity.
    Rählmann S; Meis M; Schulte M; Kießling J; Walger M; Meister H
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S105-S111. PubMed ID: 28449597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selected Cognitive Factors Associated with Individual Variability in Clinical Measures of Speech Recognition in Noise Amplified by Fast-Acting Compression Among Hearing Aid Users.
    Yumba WK
    Noise Health; 2019; 21(98):7-16. PubMed ID: 32098926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of auditory functions for Royal Canadian Mounted Police officers.
    Vaillancourt V; Laroche C; Giguère C; Beaulieu MA; Legault JP
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Jun; 22(6):313-31. PubMed ID: 21864470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
    Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On prediction of aided behavioural measures using speech auditory brainstem responses and decision trees.
    Perugia E; BinKhamis G; Schlittenlacher J; Kluk K
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0260090. PubMed ID: 34784399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use.
    Ng EH; Classon E; Larsby B; Arlinger S; Lunner T; Rudner M; Rönnberg J
    Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25421088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cochlear implant combined with a linear frequency transposing hearing aid.
    Hua H; Johansson B; Jönsson R; Magnusson L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Oct; 23(9):722-32. PubMed ID: 23072964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of Auditory Training in Experienced Hearing-Aid Users, and an Exploration of Their Health-Related Quality of Life and Coping Strategies.
    Van Wilderode M; Vermaete E; Francart T; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231198380. PubMed ID: 37709273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.