These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35943768)

  • 1. Evaluation of Medical Information on Male Sexual Dysfunction on Baidu Encyclopedia and Wikipedia: Comparative Study.
    Ma M; Yin S; Zhu M; Fan Y; Wen X; Lin T; Song T
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Aug; 24(8):e37339. PubMed ID: 35943768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of medical information on irritable bowel syndrome information in Wikipedia and Baidu Encyclopedia: comparative study.
    Li X; Chen K; Jia Y; Yin F; Wen X; Wang C; Li Z; Zhang H
    PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17264. PubMed ID: 38803580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the Liver Disease Information in Baidu Encyclopedia and Wikipedia: Longitudinal Study.
    Sun F; Yang F; Zheng S
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Jan; 23(1):e17680. PubMed ID: 33459597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of the digestive system malignancy information in Wikipedia and Baidu Encyclopedia: a longitudinal study.
    Luo J; Ma J; Xu L; Wang P; Zhang M; Xu M
    Ann Transl Med; 2022 Oct; 10(20):1112. PubMed ID: 36388827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Readability and quality of Wikipedia articles on pelvic floor disorders.
    Handler SJ; Eckhardt SE; Takashima Y; Jackson AM; Truong C; Yazdany T
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Dec; 32(12):3249-3258. PubMed ID: 33797592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can pharmacy students use Wikipedia as a learning resource? Critical assessment of articles on chemotherapeutic drugs.
    Azer SA; Alsharafi AA
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2023 Jun; 47(2):333-345. PubMed ID: 36951631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Readability of Wikipedia Pages on Autoimmune Disorders: Systematic Quantitative Assessment.
    Watad A; Bragazzi NL; Brigo F; Sharif K; Amital H; McGonagle D; Shoenfeld Y; Adawi M
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jul; 19(7):e260. PubMed ID: 28720555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Systematic Evaluation of the Quality, Accuracy, and Reliability of Internet Websites about Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
    Saleh D; Fisher JH; Provencher S; Liang Z; Ryerson CJ; Weatherald J
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2022 Aug; 19(8):1404-1413. PubMed ID: 34813417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the quality and readability of online information about breast cancer in China.
    Li Y; Zhou X; Zhou Y; Mao F; Shen S; Lin Y; Zhang X; Chang TH; Sun Q
    Patient Educ Couns; 2021 Apr; 104(4):858-864. PubMed ID: 32988687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy and readability of cardiovascular entries on Wikipedia: are they reliable learning resources for medical students?
    Azer SA; AlSwaidan NM; Alshwairikh LA; AlShammari JM
    BMJ Open; 2015 Oct; 5(10):e008187. PubMed ID: 26443650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the content quality of websites for recurrent aphthous ulcers and oral lichen planus.
    Hu X; Pan H; He W; Hua H; Yan Z
    BMC Oral Health; 2017 Dec; 17(1):170. PubMed ID: 29284468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Readability and quality of wikipedia pages on neurosurgical topics.
    Modiri O; Guha D; Alotaibi NM; Ibrahim GM; Lipsman N; Fallah A
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2018 Mar; 166():66-70. PubMed ID: 29408776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
    Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Readability of English, German, and Russian Disease-Related Wikipedia Pages: Automated Computational Analysis.
    Gordejeva J; Zowalla R; Pobiruchin M; Wiesner M
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 May; 24(5):e36835. PubMed ID: 35576562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
    Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Information on the Chinese Internet: Website Evaluation Study.
    Wang Q; Liu L; Li H; Zhang Q; Ma Q
    JMIR Form Res; 2024 Aug; 8():e56594. PubMed ID: 39088820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality of Patient Education Sections on Otitis Media Across Different Website Platforms.
    Shetty KR; Wang RY; Shetty A; Levi J; Aaronson NL
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2020 Jun; 129(6):591-598. PubMed ID: 31975608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality of Male and Female Medical Content on English-Language Wikipedia: Quantitative Content Analysis.
    Farič N; Potts HW; Heilman JM
    J Med Internet Res; 2024 Sep; 26():e47562. PubMed ID: 39264697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information.
    Broderick JM; McCarthy A; Hogan N
    Knee; 2021 Jan; 28():139-150. PubMed ID: 33360380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Readability and quality of online eating disorder information-Are they sufficient? A systematic review evaluating websites on anorexia nervosa using DISCERN and Flesch Readability.
    Arts H; Lemetyinen H; Edge D
    Int J Eat Disord; 2020 Jan; 53(1):128-132. PubMed ID: 31589331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.