159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35944343)
21. Sample-to-Answer and Routine Real-Time RT-PCR: A Comparison of Different Platforms for SARS-CoV-2 Detection.
Wen D; Yang S; Li G; Xuan Q; Guo W; Wu W
J Mol Diagn; 2021 Jun; 23(6):665-670. PubMed ID: 33706011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Direct comparison of Xpert Xpress, FilmArray Respiratory Panel, Lumipulse antigen test, and RT-qPCR in 165 nasopharyngeal swabs.
Hirotsu Y; Maejima M; Shibusawa M; Natori Y; Nagakubo Y; Hosaka K; Sueki H; Amemiya K; Hayakawa M; Mochizuki H; Tsutsui T; Kakizaki Y; Miyashita Y; Omata M
BMC Infect Dis; 2022 Mar; 22(1):221. PubMed ID: 35246055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Utility of Stool PCR for the Diagnosis of COVID-19: Comparison of Two Commercial Platforms.
Szymczak WA; Goldstein DY; Orner EP; Fecher RA; Yokoda RT; Skalina KA; Narlieva M; Gendlina I; Fox AS
J Clin Microbiol; 2020 Aug; 58(9):. PubMed ID: 32611796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Tracheal Aspirate and Bronchoalveolar Lavage as Potential Specimen Types for COVID-19 Testing Using the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV.
Kim SH; AlMutawa F
Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Jun; 10(3):e0039922. PubMed ID: 35583359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of the EasyNAT SARS-CoV-2 assay PCR test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Fernández-Sánchez F; Martín-Bautista E; Rivas-Ruiz F; Wu W; García-Aranda M;
J Virol Methods; 2024 May; 326():114908. PubMed ID: 38423363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Asymptomatic Patient Testing After 10:1 Pooling Using the Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 Assay.
Procop GW; Tuohy M; Ramsey C; Rhoads DD; Rubin BP; Figler R
Am J Clin Pathol; 2021 Mar; 155(4):522-526. PubMed ID: 33399200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Nucleocapsid single point-mutation associated with drop-out on RT-PCR assay for SARS-CoV-2 detection.
de Mello Malta F; Amgarten D; Marra AR; Petroni RC; da Silva Nali LH; Siqueira RA; Neto MC; Oler SC; Pinho JRR
BMC Infect Dis; 2023 Oct; 23(1):714. PubMed ID: 37872472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 Assay Compared with Standard M nCoV Real-Time PCR: Prospective Study.
Oh AC; Suh HJ; Kim H; Lee JK; Hong YJ
Clin Lab; 2024 Feb; 70(2):. PubMed ID: 38345984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Amplification Failure by the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 Assay due to a Single-Nucleotide Variant of the N Gene in the Omicron Variant.
Shin S; Um TH; Cho CR; Chang J
Clin Lab; 2023 Nov; 69(11):. PubMed ID: 37948480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparative analysis of point-of-care, high-throughput and laboratory-developed SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification tests (NATs).
Kohmer N; Rabenau HF; Hoehl S; Kortenbusch M; Ciesek S; Berger A
J Virol Methods; 2021 May; 291():114102. PubMed ID: 33607117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of three extraction-free SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assays: A feasible alternative approach with low technical requirements.
Visseaux B; Collin G; Houhou-Fidouh N; Le Hingrat Q; Ferré VM; Damond F; Ichou H; Descamps D; Charpentier C
J Virol Methods; 2021 May; 291():114086. PubMed ID: 33577957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of G29179T mutation on two commercial PCR assays for SARS-CoV-2 detection.
Kami W; Kinjo T; Hashioka H; Arakaki W; Uechi K; Takahashi A; Oki H; Tanaka K; Motooka D; Nakamura S; Nakamatsu M; Maeda S; Yamamoto K; Fujita J
J Virol Methods; 2023 Apr; 314():114692. PubMed ID: 36796678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 virus detection using the Xpert Xpress rapid molecular test on Abbott M2000 Real-Time System: a cross-sectional study.
Hasanah M; Aulia FA; Wardhani P; Aryati
Ann Med Surg (Lond); 2023 Jun; 85(6):2559-2563. PubMed ID: 37363578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Multiplexing primer/probe sets for detection of SARS-CoV-2 by qRT-PCR.
Perchetti GA; Nalla AK; Huang ML; Jerome KR; Greninger AL
J Clin Virol; 2020 Aug; 129():104499. PubMed ID: 32535397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Saliva as alternative to naso-oropharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2 detection by RT-qPCR: a multicenter cross-sectional diagnostic validation study.
Tee ML; Abrilla AA; Tee CA; Dalmacio LMM; Villaflor VJP; Abubakar AA; Tagayuna PY; Aquino SSC; Bernardo VAL; Matias RR
Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):12612. PubMed ID: 35871257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of Digital PCR and Quantitative PCR with Various SARS-CoV-2 Primer-Probe Sets.
Park C; Lee J; Hassan ZU; Ku KB; Kim SJ; Kim HG; Park EC; Park GS; Park D; Baek SH; Park D; Lee J; Jeon S; Kim S; Lee CS; Yoo HM; Kim S
J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2021 Mar; 31(3):358-367. PubMed ID: 33397829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Digital PCR to Measure SARS-CoV-2 RNA, Variants, and Outcomes in Youth.
Hijano DR; Ferrolino JA; Gu Z; Brazelton JN; Zhu H; Suganda S; Glasgow HL; Dallas RH; Allison KJ; Maron G; ; Darji H; Tang L; Fabrizio TP; Webby RJ; Hayden RT
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc; 2023 Dec; 12(12):618-626. PubMed ID: 37956414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Analytical and Clinical Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in the Detection and Quantification of SARS-CoV-2.
Kim KB; Choi H; Lee GD; Lee J; Lee S; Kim Y; Cho SY; Lee DG; Kim M
Mol Diagn Ther; 2021 Sep; 25(5):617-628. PubMed ID: 34319580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Development of the RealTime SARS-CoV-2 quantitative Laboratory Developed Test and correlation with viral culture as a measure of infectivity.
Berg MG; Zhen W; Lucic D; Degli-Angeli EJ; Anderson M; Forberg K; Olivo A; Sheikh F; Toolsie D; Greninger AL; Cloherty GA; Coombs RW; Berry GJ
J Clin Virol; 2021 Oct; 143():104945. PubMed ID: 34450558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. When rare becomes common: N2 gene-positive, E gene-negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR results between 2021 and 2022.
Kraus FB; Moritz S; Mamadova K; Popp M; Kocijancic M; Ludwig-Kraus B
J Clin Virol Plus; 2023 Jun; 3(2):100152. PubMed ID: 37206092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
