These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35944429)

  • 1. Fugitive methane emissions from two agricultural biogas plants.
    Baldé H; Wagner-Riddle C; MacDonald D; VanderZaag A
    Waste Manag; 2022 Sep; 151():123-130. PubMed ID: 35944429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Total methane emission rates and losses from 23 biogas plants.
    Scheutz C; Fredenslund AM
    Waste Manag; 2019 Sep; 97():38-46. PubMed ID: 31447025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Danish national effort to minimise methane emissions from biogas plants.
    Michael Fredenslund A; Gudmundsson E; Maria Falk J; Scheutz C
    Waste Manag; 2023 Feb; 157():321-329. PubMed ID: 36592586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methane losses from different biogas plant technologies.
    Wechselberger V; Reinelt T; Yngvesson J; Scharfy D; Scheutz C; Huber-Humer M; Hrad M
    Waste Manag; 2023 Feb; 157():110-120. PubMed ID: 36529031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methane emissions from digestate at an agricultural biogas plant.
    Baldé H; VanderZaag AC; Burtt SD; Wagner-Riddle C; Crolla A; Desjardins RL; MacDonald DJ
    Bioresour Technol; 2016 Sep; 216():914-22. PubMed ID: 27323243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Estimating Methane Fugitive Emissions from Oil and Natural Gas Systems in China].
    Chen CC; Lü YL; He GZ
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2022 Nov; 43(11):4905-4913. PubMed ID: 36437062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determining methane emissions from biogas plants--Operational and meteorological aspects.
    Hrad M; Piringer M; Huber-Humer M
    Bioresour Technol; 2015 Sep; 191():234-43. PubMed ID: 26000833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from 10 biogas plants within the agricultural sector.
    Liebetrau J; Reinelt T; Clemens J; Hafermann C; Friehe J; Weiland P
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(6):1370-9. PubMed ID: 23508164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantification of methane emissions from UK biogas plants.
    Bakkaloglu S; Lowry D; Fisher RE; France JL; Brunner D; Chen H; Nisbet EG
    Waste Manag; 2021 Apr; 124():82-93. PubMed ID: 33610114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Field measurements of fugitive methane emissions from three Australian waste management and biogas facilities.
    Reinelt T; McCabe BK; Hill A; Harris P; Baillie C; Liebetrau J
    Waste Manag; 2022 Jan; 137():294-303. PubMed ID: 34823136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On-site and ground-based remote sensing measurements of methane emissions from four biogas plants: A comparison study.
    Fredenslund AM; Hinge J; Holmgren MA; Rasmussen SG; Scheutz C
    Bioresour Technol; 2018 Dec; 270():88-95. PubMed ID: 30212778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Possibility of using tannins to control greenhouse gas production during digestate storage.
    Kintl A; Hammerschmiedt T; Vítěz T; Brtnický M; Vejražka K; Huňady I; Látal O; Elbl J
    Waste Manag; 2023 Feb; 156():75-83. PubMed ID: 36442329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of operational methane emissions from pressure relief valves from biogas storages of biogas plants.
    Reinelt T; Liebetrau J; Nelles M
    Bioresour Technol; 2016 Oct; 217():257-64. PubMed ID: 26944456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A dynamic model for calculating methane emissions from digestate based on co-digestion of animal manure and biogas crops in full scale German biogas plants.
    Muha I; Linke B; Wittum G
    Bioresour Technol; 2015 Feb; 178():350-358. PubMed ID: 25239786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ammonia and methane emissions during drying of dewatered biogas digestate in a two-belt conveyor dryer.
    Awiszus S; Meissner K; Reyer S; Müller J
    Bioresour Technol; 2018 Jan; 247():419-425. PubMed ID: 28963990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anaerobic digestion of agricultural and other substrates--implications for greenhouse gas emissions.
    Pucker J; Jungmeier G; Siegl S; Pötsch EM
    Animal; 2013 Jun; 7 Suppl 2():283-91. PubMed ID: 23739470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ground-based remote sensing of CH
    Gålfalk M; Påledal SN; Sehlén R; Bastviken D
    Environ Res; 2022 Mar; 204(Pt B):111978. PubMed ID: 34480946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Elimination of methane in exhaust gas from biogas upgrading process by immobilized methane-oxidizing bacteria.
    Wu YM; Yang J; Fan XL; Fu SF; Sun MT; Guo RB
    Bioresour Technol; 2017 May; 231():124-128. PubMed ID: 28254343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anaerobic digestion and digestate use: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contribution.
    Møller J; Boldrin A; Christensen TH
    Waste Manag Res; 2009 Nov; 27(8):813-24. PubMed ID: 19748957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Greenhouse gas emission reductions from domestic anaerobic digesters linked with sustainable sanitation in rural China.
    Dhingra R; Christensen ER; Liu Y; Zhong B; Wu CF; Yost MG; Remais JV
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2345-52. PubMed ID: 21348471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.