121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35944444)
1. Fetal dose estimation for Virtual Tangential-fields Arc Therapy whole breast irradiation by optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters.
Dusi F; Guida F; Garcia ENV; Rossato MA; Germani A; Sapignoli S; Scaggion A; Scott A; Zorz A; Paiusco M
Phys Med; 2022 Sep; 101():44-49. PubMed ID: 35944444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurement of surface dose in an MR-Linac with optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters for IMRT beam geometries.
Lim-Reinders S; Keller BM; Sahgal A; Chugh B; Kim A
Med Phys; 2020 Jul; 47(7):3133-3142. PubMed ID: 32302010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Out-of-field dose assessment for a 1.5 T MR-Linac with optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters.
Zhang Y; Yan S; Cui Z; Wang Y; Li Z; Yin Y; Li B; Quan H; Zhu J
Med Phys; 2021 Jul; 48(7):4027-4037. PubMed ID: 33714229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterization of nanoDot optically stimulated luminescence detectors and high-sensitivity MCP-N thermoluminescent detectors in the 40-300 kVp energy range.
Poirier Y; Kuznetsova S; Villarreal-Barajas JE
Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):402-413. PubMed ID: 29164632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of fetal dose using Optically Simulated Luminescence Dosimeter and ion chamber in randophantom for various radiotherapy techniques.
Sushma N; Kaginelli S; Sathiyaraj P; Senthil Manikandan P; Ganesh KM
Appl Radiat Isot; 2023 Aug; 198():110854. PubMed ID: 37209491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Virtual Tangential-fields Arc Therapy (ViTAT) for whole breast irradiation: Technique optimization and validation.
Esposito PG; Castriconi R; Mangili P; Fodor A; Pasetti M; Di Muzio NG; Del Vecchio A; Fiorino C
Phys Med; 2020 Sep; 77():160-168. PubMed ID: 32866777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters stable response to dose after repeated bleaching.
Jursinic PA
Med Phys; 2020 Jul; 47(7):3191-3203. PubMed ID: 32297332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Al
Christensen JB; Togno M; Nesteruk KP; Psoroulas S; Meer D; Weber DC; Lomax T; Yukihara EG; Safai S
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Apr; 66(8):. PubMed ID: 33571973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Replacing Manual Planning of Whole Breast Irradiation With Knowledge-Based Automatic Optimization by Virtual Tangential-Fields Arc Therapy.
Castriconi R; Esposito PG; Tudda A; Mangili P; Broggi S; Fodor A; Deantoni CL; Longobardi B; Pasetti M; Perna L; Del Vecchio A; Di Muzio NG; Fiorino C
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():712423. PubMed ID: 34504790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of OSLD and a treatment planning system for surface dose determination in IMRT treatments.
Zhuang AH; Olch AJ
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081720. PubMed ID: 25086530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surface and near-surface dose measurements at beam entry and exit in a 1.5 T MR-Linac using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters.
Kim A; Lim-Reinders S; Ahmad SB; Sahgal A; Keller BM
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Feb; 65(4):045012. PubMed ID: 31860896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiation dose measurements in a dental orthopantogram unit using indigenously developed optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters.
Kumar P; Dutt Sharma S; Chandola RM; Mishra DR; Dhabekar B; Rawat NS; Kadam S; Agrawal S
Luminescence; 2019 Jun; 34(4):444-449. PubMed ID: 31025441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multi-institutional dose audit in radiotherapy facilities using in-house developed optically stimulated luminescence disc dosimeters.
Kumar P; Sharma SD; Dhabekar B; Rawat NS; Mishra DR; Chaudhari S; Chandola RM; Routh T; Agrawal S
J Cancer Res Ther; 2023 Apr; 19(Supplement):S0. PubMed ID: 37147959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The measurement of entrance surface dose using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters for determining average glandular dose in digital breast tomosynthesis: Measurement and simulation study.
Chusin T; Yabsantia S; Matsubara K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Jan; 23(1):e13485. PubMed ID: 35041264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dose-response dependencies of OSL dosimeters in conventional linacs and 1.5T MR-linacs: an experimental and Monte Carlo study.
Episkopakis A; Margaroni V; Kanellopoulou S; Marinos N; Koutsouveli E; Karaiskos P; Pappas EP
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Nov; 68(22):. PubMed ID: 37857285
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter for exit dose
Ponmalar R; Manickam R; Saminathan S; Ganesh KM; Raman A; Godson HF
J Cancer Res Ther; 2018; 14(6):1341-1349. PubMed ID: 30488854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vivo dosimetry with optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters, OSLDs, compared to diodes; the effects of buildup cap thickness and fabrication material.
Jursinic PA; Yahnke CJ
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5432-40. PubMed ID: 21992362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Measurement of peak correction factor of Farmer chamber for calibration of flattening filter free (FFF) clinical photon beams].
Kontra G; Major T; Polgár C
Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 26035159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relative energy response of indigenously developed optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters Al
Kumar P; Dhabekar B; Sharma SD; Mishra DR; Rawat NS; Kadam S; Chaudhari S; Chandola RM; Agrawal S
Luminescence; 2020 Dec; 35(8):1217-1222. PubMed ID: 32515166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensitivity and stability of optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters with filled deep electron/hole traps under pre-irradiation and bleaching conditions.
Park SY; Choi CH; Park JM; Chun M; Han JH; Kim JI
Phys Med; 2017 Jun; 38():81-87. PubMed ID: 28610701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
