These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The Supreme Court and abortion: 1. Upholding constitutional principles. Noonan JT Hastings Cent Rep; 1980 Dec; 10(6):14-6. PubMed ID: 7461954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Supreme Court and abortion: the irrelevance of medical judgment. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1980 Oct; 10(5):23-4. PubMed ID: 7002867 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around. Horan DJ; Marzen TJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion 1980: the debate continues. Healey JM Conn Med; 1980 Sep; 44(9):605. PubMed ID: 7408487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Supreme Court rules on access to contraception, abortion: states can deny Medicaid benefits, hospital services for elective abortions. Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Aug; 6(4):41+. PubMed ID: 11663780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Abortion as a vice crime: a "what if" story. Kaplan J Law Contemp Probl; 1988; 51(1):151-79. PubMed ID: 11650281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The limits of judicial intervention in abortion politics. Tatalovich R; Daynes BW Christ Century; 1982 Jan 6-13; 99(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 11655445 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Mediating the polar extremes: a guide to post-Webster abortion policy. Wilkins RG; Sherlock R; Clark S Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1991; 1991(1):403-87. PubMed ID: 11656173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The economics of abortion access in the US: restrictions on government funding for abortion is the post-Roe battleground. Fried MG Conscience; 2005-2006; 26(4):11-5. PubMed ID: 16619422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Supreme Court and abortion: 2. Sidestepping social realities. Mechanic D Hastings Cent Rep; 1980 Dec; 10(6):17-9. PubMed ID: 7007284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 80 percent of Americans believe abortion should be legal; 70 percent approve Medicaid Funding. Fam Plann Perspect; 1979; 11(3):189-90. PubMed ID: 383496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Hyde Amendment and the future. Rosoff JI Fam Plann Perspect; 1980; 12(4):172. PubMed ID: 7002585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The gap between law and moral order: an examination of the legitimacy of the Supreme Court abortion decisions. Wardle LD Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1980; 1980(4):811-35. PubMed ID: 11655721 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. National health care legislation and the funding of abortion. Mahoney HM America (NY); 1993 Oct; 169(11):8-9. PubMed ID: 11659793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions. Haas-Wilson D J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The abortion-funding cases and population control: an imaginary lawsuit (and some reflections on the uncertain limits of reproductive privacy). Appleton SF Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1688-723. PubMed ID: 10245968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion, conscience and the Constitution: an examination of federal institutional conscience clauses. Pilpel HF; Patton DE Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1974 Fall-1975 Winter; 6(2):279-305. PubMed ID: 11663597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]