175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35945668)
1. Precision of attenuation coefficient measurements by optical coherence tomography.
Neubrand LB; van Leeuwen TG; Faber DJ
J Biomed Opt; 2022 Aug; 27(8):. PubMed ID: 35945668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy and precision of depth-resolved estimation of attenuation coefficients in optical coherence tomography.
Neubrand LB; van Leeuwen TG; Faber DJ
J Biomed Opt; 2023 Jun; 28(6):066001. PubMed ID: 37325192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Depth-dependent attenuation and backscattering characterization of optical coherence tomography by stationary iterative method.
Wang Y; Wei S; Kang JU
J Biomed Opt; 2023 Aug; 28(8):085002. PubMed ID: 37638109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Towards non-invasive tissue hydration measurements with optical coherence tomography.
Neubrand LB; van Leeuwen TG; Faber DJ
J Biophotonics; 2024 May; ():e202300532. PubMed ID: 38735734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Depth-resolved method for attenuation coefficient calculation from optical coherence tomography data for improved biological structure visualization.
Moiseev A; Sherstnev E; Kiseleva E; Achkasova K; Potapov A; Yashin K; Sirotkina M; Gelikonov G; Matkivsky V; Shilyagin P; Ksenofontov S; Bederina E; Medyanik I; Zagaynova E; Gladkova N
J Biophotonics; 2023 Dec; 16(12):e202100392. PubMed ID: 37551154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimized depth-resolved estimation to measure optical attenuation coefficients from optical coherence tomography and its application in cerebral damage determination.
Liu J; Ding N; Yu Y; Yuan X; Luo S; Luan J; Zhao Y; Wang Y; Ma Z
J Biomed Opt; 2019 Mar; 24(3):1-11. PubMed ID: 30834722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated, Depth-Resolved Estimation of the Attenuation Coefficient From Optical Coherence Tomography Data.
Smith GT; Dwork N; O'Connor D; Sikora U; Lurie KL; Pauly JM; Ellerbee AK
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2015 Dec; 34(12):2592-602. PubMed ID: 26126286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of quantitative attenuation and backscattering coefficient measurements by optical coherence tomography in the concentration-dependent and multiple scattering regime.
Almasian M; Bosschaart N; van Leeuwen TG; Faber DJ
J Biomed Opt; 2015; 20(12):121314. PubMed ID: 26720868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Layer-based, depth-resolved computation of attenuation coefficients and backscattering fractions in tissue using optical coherence tomography.
Cannon TM; Bouma BE; Uribe-Patarroyo N
Biomed Opt Express; 2021 Aug; 12(8):5037-5056. PubMed ID: 34513241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Functional imaging of dye concentration in tissue phantoms by spectroscopic optical coherence tomography.
Støren T; Røyset A; Svaasand LO; Lindmo T
J Biomed Opt; 2005; 10(2):024037. PubMed ID: 15910110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Depth-resolved model-based reconstruction of attenuation coefficients in optical coherence tomography.
Vermeer KA; Mo J; Weda JJ; Lemij HG; de Boer JF
Biomed Opt Express; 2013 Dec; 5(1):322-37. PubMed ID: 24466497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. General model for depth-resolved estimation of the optical attenuation coefficients in optical coherence tomography.
Amaral MM; Zezell DM; Monte AFG; de Cara ACB; Araújo JCR; Antunes A; Freitas AZ
J Biophotonics; 2019 Oct; 12(10):e201800402. PubMed ID: 31012263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Precision of measurement of tissue optical properties with optical coherence tomography.
Kholodnykh AI; Petrova IY; Larin KV; Motamedi M; Esenaliev RO
Appl Opt; 2003 Jun; 42(16):3027-37. PubMed ID: 12790454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Frequency estimation precision in Doppler optical coherence tomography using the Cramer-Rao lower bound.
Yazdanfar S; Yang C; Sarunic M; Izatt J
Opt Express; 2005 Jan; 13(2):410-6. PubMed ID: 19488367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differentiation between normal and tumor mammary glands with depth-resolved attenuation coefficient from optical coherence tomography.
Maciel MJ; Pereira HM; Pimenta S; Miranda A; Nunes-Pereira EJ; Correia JH
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 Nov; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 34753120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate cancer diagnosis: the feasibility of needle-based optical coherence tomography.
Muller BG; de Bruin DM; van den Bos W; Brandt MJ; Velu JF; Bus MT; Faber DJ; Savci D; Zondervan PJ; de Reijke TM; Pes PL; de la Rosette J; van Leeuwen TG
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2015 Jul; 2(3):037501. PubMed ID: 26171414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Maximum likelihood Doppler frequency estimation under decorrelation noise for quantifying flow in optical coherence tomography.
Chan AC; Srinivasan VJ; Lam EY
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2014 Jun; 33(6):1313-23. PubMed ID: 24760902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Theoretical range precision obtained by maximum likelihood estimation in laser radar compared with the Cramer-Rao bound.
Gu Z; Lai J; Wang C; Yan W; Ji Y; Li Z
Appl Opt; 2018 Dec; 57(34):9951-9957. PubMed ID: 30645251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optical coherence tomography of basal cell carcinoma: density and signal attenuation.
Yücel D; Themstrup L; Manfredi M; Jemec GB
Skin Res Technol; 2016 Nov; 22(4):497-504. PubMed ID: 27264340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Kasai autocorrelation and maximum likelihood estimators for Doppler optical coherence tomography.
Chan AC; Lam EY; Srinivasan VJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Jun; 32(6):1033-42. PubMed ID: 23446044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
