These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35946250)

  • 1. Enamel surface roughness evaluation after bracket debonding: Comparison between light cure and self cure adhesive resin 3-Dimensional profilometric study.
    Chandrasekharan D; Sourabh C; Deenadayalan ; Praveen K
    Indian J Dent Res; 2022; 33(1):80-84. PubMed ID: 35946250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of enamel surfaces after bracket debonding: an in-vivo study with scanning electron microscopy.
    Alessandri Bonetti G; Zanarini M; Incerti Parenti S; Lattuca M; Marchionni S; Gatto MR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):696-702. PubMed ID: 22051490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Comparative Evaluation of Enamel Surface Roughness of Two Different Bonding Adhesives After Debonding With Atomic Force Microscopy.
    Doddavarapu S; K B; Singaraju GS; Yamini Priyanka JS; Vivek Reddy G; Mandava P
    Cureus; 2022 Nov; 14(11):e31661. PubMed ID: 36420047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Construction of an
    Goyal S; Kulkarni N; Naik A; Naik B
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Feb; 23(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 35748449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the debonding characteristics of two innovative ceramic bracket designs.
    Bishara SE; Olsen ME; VonWald L; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 10393585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of different bonding and debonding techniques on debonding ceramic orthodontic brackets.
    Sinha PK; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Aug; 112(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 9267223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of enamel surface integrity after orthodontic bracket debonding: comparison of three different system.
    Ghaleb L; Al-Worafi NA; Thawaba A; Abdulqader AA; Alkamel A; Abdo Y; Yang Z; Noman N; Al-Aroomi MA; Yulou T
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):358. PubMed ID: 38509532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An in vitro evaluation of a metal reinforced orthodontic ceramic bracket.
    Mundstock KS; Sadowsky PL; Lacefield W; Bae S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Dec; 116(6):635-41. PubMed ID: 10587597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Use of the Er:YAG Laser for Bracket Debonding and Its Effect on Enamel Damage.
    Dostalova T; Jelinkova H; Remes M; Šulc J; Němec M
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2016 Sep; 34(9):394-9. PubMed ID: 27415584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Orthodontic Bracket Bonding Using Self-adhesive Cement to Facilitate Bracket Debonding.
    Mitwally RA; Bakhsh ZT; Feteih RM; Bakry AS; Abbassy MA
    J Adhes Dent; 2019; 21(6):551-556. PubMed ID: 31802071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of enamel roughness after orthodontic debonding and clean-up procedures using zirconia, tungsten carbide, and white stone burs: an in vitro study.
    Thawaba AA; Albelasy NF; Elsherbini AM; Hafez AM
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jul; 23(1):478. PubMed ID: 37443027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Bond Strength of Brackets with Foil Mesh and Laser Structure Base using Light Cure Composite Resin: An in vitro Study.
    Rajesh RN; Girish KS; Sanjay N; Scindhia RD; Kumar SG; Rajesh S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Dec; 16(12):963-70. PubMed ID: 27018031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enamel surface roughness following debonding resin clean up using high speed air-turbine and electric handpieces. In vitro study.
    Yousry TN; Abolgheit S; Kassem HE
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 May; 24(1):609. PubMed ID: 38796434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of various debonding and adhesive clearance methods on enamel surface: an in vitro study.
    Fan XC; Chen L; Huang XF
    BMC Oral Health; 2017 Feb; 17(1):58. PubMed ID: 28241812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Loss of surface enamel after bracket debonding: an in-vivo and ex-vivo evaluation.
    Pont HB; Özcan M; Bagis B; Ren Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Oct; 138(4):387.e1-387.e9. PubMed ID: 20889035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physical and adhesive properties of dental enamel after radiotherapy and bonding of metal and ceramic brackets.
    Santin GC; Palma-Dibb RG; Romano FL; de Oliveira HF; Nelson Filho P; de Queiroz AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Aug; 148(2):283-92. PubMed ID: 26232837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the effects of CO2 laser on debonding of orthodontics porcelain brackets vs. the conventional method.
    Tehranchi A; Fekrazad R; Zafar M; Eslami B; Kalhori KA; Gutknecht N
    Lasers Med Sci; 2011 Sep; 26(5):563-7. PubMed ID: 20725757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of different resin removal methods on enamel after metal and ceramic bracket debonding : An in vitro micro-computed tomography study.
    Cesur E; Arslan C; Orhan AI; Bilecenoğlu B; Orhan K
    J Orofac Orthop; 2022 May; 83(3):157-171. PubMed ID: 34165586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of repeated bonding on the shear bond strength of different orthodontic adhesives.
    Bishara SE; Laffoon JF; Vonwald L; Warren JJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 May; 121(5):521-5. PubMed ID: 12045771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.