These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35947568)
21. Eye blink rate increases as a function of cognitive load during an auditory oddball paradigm. Magliacano A; Fiorenza S; Estraneo A; Trojano L Neurosci Lett; 2020 Sep; 736():135293. PubMed ID: 32771601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Auditory processing under cross-modal visual load investigated with simultaneous EEG-fMRI. Regenbogen C; De Vos M; Debener S; Turetsky BI; Mössnang C; Finkelmeyer A; Habel U; Neuner I; Kellermann T PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e52267. PubMed ID: 23251704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. EEG-based cognitive load of processing events in 3D virtual worlds is lower than processing events in 2D displays. Dan A; Reiner M Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Dec; 122():75-84. PubMed ID: 27592084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. In a Concurrent Memory and Auditory Perception Task, the Pupil Dilation Response Is More Sensitive to Memory Load Than to Auditory Stimulus Characteristics. Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Rönnberg J; Rudner M Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):272-286. PubMed ID: 29923867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Neural markers of proactive and reactive cognitive control are altered during walking: A Mobile Brain-Body Imaging (MoBI) study. Richardson DP; Foxe JJ; Mazurek KA; Abraham N; Freedman EG Neuroimage; 2022 Feb; 247():118853. PubMed ID: 34954331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparing Non-Visual and Visual Guidance Methods for Narrow Field of View Augmented Reality Displays. Marquardt A; Trepkowski C; Eibich TD; Maiero J; Kruijff E; Schoning J IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2020 Dec; 26(12):3389-3401. PubMed ID: 32941150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Augmented Reality Improves Procedural Work on an International Space Station Science Instrument. Braly AM; Nuernberger B; Kim SY Hum Factors; 2019 Sep; 61(6):866-878. PubMed ID: 30694084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of cognitive load on neural and behavioral responses to smoking-cue distractors. MacLean RR; Nichols TT; LeBreton JM; Wilson SJ Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 16(4):588-600. PubMed ID: 27012714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Testing Augmented Reality for Eliciting Cue-Provoked Urges to Smoke: Toward Moving Cue-Exposure Into the Real World. Brandon KO; Vinci C; Kleinjan M; Hernandez LM; Sawyer LE; Sutton SK; Brandon TH Nicotine Tob Res; 2021 May; 23(5):861-865. PubMed ID: 33277653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Human interaction with robotic systems: performance and workload evaluations. Reinerman-Jones L; Barber DJ; Szalma JL; Hancock PA Ergonomics; 2017 Oct; 60(10):1351-1368. PubMed ID: 28745552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Individual differences in aging and cognitive control modulate the neural indexes of context updating and maintenance during task switching. Adrover-Roig D; Barceló F Cortex; 2010 Apr; 46(4):434-50. PubMed ID: 19889406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Are all behavioral reward benefits created equally? An EEG-fMRI study. Kostandyan M; Park HRP; Bundt C; González-García C; Wisniewski D; Krebs RM; Boehler CN Neuroimage; 2020 Jul; 215():116829. PubMed ID: 32283272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Exploiting temporal predictability: Event-related potential correlates of task-supportive temporal cue processing in auditory distraction. Volosin M; Grimm S; Horváth J Brain Res; 2016 May; 1639():120-31. PubMed ID: 26947619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Using augmented reality to cue obstacles for people with low vision. Fox DR; Ahmadzada A; Wang CT; Azenkot S; Chu MA; Manduchi R; Cooper EA Opt Express; 2023 Feb; 31(4):6827-6848. PubMed ID: 36823931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessing the Effect of Augmented Reality on Procedural Outcomes During Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Access. Saruwatari MS; Nguyen TN; Talari HF; Matisoff AJ; Sharma KV; Donoho KG; Basu S; Dwivedi P; Bost JE; Shekhar R Ultrasound Med Biol; 2023 Nov; 49(11):2346-2353. PubMed ID: 37573178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Learning to direct attention: Consequences for procedural task training programs. Crouse MD Acta Psychol (Amst); 2024 Oct; 250():104502. PubMed ID: 39326200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Performance evaluation of a motor-imagery-based EEG-Brain computer interface using a combined cue with heterogeneous training data in BCI-Naive subjects. Choi D; Ryu Y; Lee Y; Lee M Biomed Eng Online; 2011 Oct; 10():91. PubMed ID: 21992570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of self-evaluation on the P300 event-related potential. Alexander JE; Alexander RG; Crowson B; Machan K; Hall CA; Lockwood D; Godinez D Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Apr; 100(2):409-20. PubMed ID: 15974352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Right hemisphere dominance for auditory attention and its modulation by eye position: an event related fMRI study. Petit L; Simon G; Joliot M; Andersson F; Bertin T; Zago L; Mellet E; Tzourio-Mazoyer N Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2007; 25(3-4):211-25. PubMed ID: 17943000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]