165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35949732)
1. A Comparative Analysis of Risk Scoring Systems in Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleed.
Renukaprasad AK; Narayanaswamy S; R V
Cureus; 2022 Jul; 14(7):e26669. PubMed ID: 35949732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative analysis of risk scoring systems in predicting clinical outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleed.
S S; Renukaprasad AK; N S
J Assoc Physicians India; 2022 Apr; 70(4):11-12. PubMed ID: 35443498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
Robertson M; Majumdar A; Boyapati R; Chung W; Worland T; Terbah R; Wei J; Lontos S; Angus P; Vaughan R
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score and modified Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in predicting outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: An accuracy and calibration study.
Akhila Arya PV; Thulaseedharan NK; Raj R; Unnikrishnan DC; Jacob A
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug; 42(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 37382854
[TBL] [
