166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35949767)
1. Comparison Between McCoy Laryngoscope and C-MAC Video Laryngoscope in Anticipated Difficult Airway: A Prospective Randomised Study.
Garg M; Shakya R; Mary Lyngdoh N; Pradhan D
Cureus; 2022 Jul; 14(7):e26685. PubMed ID: 35949767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective randomized comparative trial of pediatric C-MAC D-blade video laryngoscope with McCoy direct laryngoscope for intubation in children posted for elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia.
Kamal G; Agarwal D; Agarwal S; Gupta A; Gupta A; Kalra B; Gupta N
Paediatr Anaesth; 2024 Aug; 34(8):750-757. PubMed ID: 38682461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the C-MAC D-blade video laryngoscope and the McCoy laryngoscope for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation: A prospective randomized controlled study.
Kim KM; Seo KH; Kim YJ; John H; Moon HS; Kim N; Yeon N
Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Nov; 101(45):e31775. PubMed ID: 36397435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improvement in glottic visualisation by using the C-MAC PM video laryngoscope as a first-line device for out-of-hospital emergency tracheal intubation: An observational study.
Hossfeld B; Frey K; Doerges V; Lampl L; Helm M
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Jun; 32(6):425-31. PubMed ID: 25886716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hemodynamic Response to Orotracheal Intubation: Comparison between Macintosh, McCoy, and C-MAC Video Laryngoscope.
Aggarwal H; Kaur S; Baghla N; Kaur S
Anesth Essays Res; 2019; 13(2):308-312. PubMed ID: 31198251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of performance characteristics of C-MAC video, McCoy, and Macintosh laryngoscopes in elective cervical spine surgery.
Nair SM; Menon GD; George M; Issac E; Bhaskaran R
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2021; 37(4):569-573. PubMed ID: 35340959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of glottic visualisation and ease of intubation with different laryngoscope blades.
Kulkarni AP; Tirmanwar AS
Indian J Anaesth; 2013 Mar; 57(2):170-4. PubMed ID: 23825817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative Evaluation of C-MAC Videolaryngoscope with Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope in Patients with Normal Airway Predictors.
Kumari M; Aastha ; Kumari A; Bathla S; Sabharwal N; Das AK
Anesth Essays Res; 2022; 16(3):326-330. PubMed ID: 36620111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Effectiveness between Wycope Video Laryngoscope, C-MAC Video Laryngoscope, and Direct Laryngoscope in Intubation of Elective Surgery Patients.
Jayadi J; Veterini AS; Kusuma E; Waloejo CS; Airlangga PS; Semedi BP
Acta Med Acad; 2022 Aug; 51(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 36318002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomized controlled comparison of non-channeled king vision, McGrath MAC video laryngoscope and Macintosh direct laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients with predicted difficult intubations.
Zhu H; Liu J; Suo L; Zhou C; Sun Y; Jiang H
BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):166. PubMed ID: 31470814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope and McCoy laryngoscope efficacy for nasotracheal intubation in simulated cervical spinal injury: a prospective randomized comparative study.
Seo KH; Kim KM; John H; Jun JH; Han M; Kim S
BMC Anesthesiol; 2020 May; 20(1):114. PubMed ID: 32408862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of C-MAC vs. McGrath video laryngoscopes on glottic exposure and endotracheal intubation success with stylet usage in obese patients.
Karadağ Erkoç S; Yıldırım Güçlü Ç; Büyük S; Bermede O; Erkent FD; Yılmaz AA
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2022 Aug; 26(16):5763-5773. PubMed ID: 36066150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative study of the C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope and McCoy laryngoscope for oro-tracheal intubation with manual in-line stabilization of neck in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery.
Kumari A; Choudhuri P; Agrawal N
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2023; 39(3):435-443. PubMed ID: 38025557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the McGrath MAC and Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in 2000 patients undergoing general anaesthesia: the randomised multicentre EMMA trial study protocol.
Kriege M; Alflen C; Tzanova I; Schmidtmann I; Piepho T; Noppens RR
BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e016907. PubMed ID: 28827261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the Airtraq and McCoy laryngoscopes using a rigid neck collar in patients with simulated difficult laryngoscopy.
Ali QE; Das B; Amir SH; Siddiqui OA; Jamil S
J Clin Anesth; 2014 May; 26(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 24809787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative Evaluation of McGrath MAC, Truview Video Laryngoscopes and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Surgery under General Anaesthesia.
Kaur G; Gupta S; Mehta N; Dhingra JS
Anesth Essays Res; 2020; 14(1):20-24. PubMed ID: 32843786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Glidescope Core, C-MAC Miller and conventional Miller laryngoscope for difficult airway management by anesthetists with limited and extensive experience in a simulated Pierre Robin sequence: A randomized crossover manikin study.
Moritz A; Holzhauser L; Fuchte T; Kremer S; Schmidt J; Irouschek A
PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250369. PubMed ID: 33886650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of McCoy, TruView, and Macintosh laryngoscopes for tracheal intubation in patients with immobilized cervical spine.
Bharti N; Arora S; Panda NB
Saudi J Anaesth; 2014 Apr; 8(2):188-92. PubMed ID: 24843330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the new Viewmax laryngoscope in a simulated difficult airway.
Leung YY; Hung CT; Tan ST
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2006 May; 50(5):562-7. PubMed ID: 16643225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of three video laryngoscopy devices to direct laryngoscopy for intubating obese patients: a randomized controlled trial.
Yumul R; Elvir-Lazo OL; White PF; Sloninsky A; Kaplan M; Kariger R; Naruse R; Parker N; Pham C; Zhang X; Wender RH
J Clin Anesth; 2016 Jun; 31():71-7. PubMed ID: 27185681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
