BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3594984)

  • 21. Histological findings of the femoral bone after cement removal in hip revision. An experimental study of cadaver femurs with two different cement removal procedures.
    Porsch M; Schmidt J
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Jun; 123(5):199-202. PubMed ID: 12743715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Biomechanical and histologic investigation of cemented total hip arthroplasties. A study of autopsy-retrieved femurs after in vivo cycling.
    Maloney WJ; Jasty M; Burke DW; O'Connor DO; Zalenski EB; Bragdon C; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Dec; (249):129-40. PubMed ID: 2582664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A stem design change to reduce peak cement strains at the tip of cemented total hip arthroplasty.
    Estok DM; Harris WH
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Aug; 15(5):584-9. PubMed ID: 10959996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of stem geometry on mechanics of cemented femoral hip components with a proximal bond.
    Mann KA; Bartel DL; Ayers DC
    J Orthop Res; 1997 Sep; 15(5):700-6. PubMed ID: 9420599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of femoral stem length on stress raisers associated with revision hip arthroplasty.
    Panjabi MM; Trumble T; Hult JE; Southwick WO
    J Orthop Res; 1985; 3(4):447-55. PubMed ID: 4067703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Controlled perforation. A safe method of cement removal from the femoral canal.
    Sydney SV; Mallory TH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Apr; (253):168-72. PubMed ID: 2317970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Femoral component offset. Its effect on strain in bone-cement.
    Davey JR; O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Harris WH
    J Arthroplasty; 1993 Feb; 8(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 8436985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of an expandable stem total hip replacement system.
    Kummer FJ; Strauss EJ; Jaffe WL
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2007; 65(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 17581101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fixation of the acetabular cup in cemented total hip replacement: improving the anchorage hole profile using finite element method.
    Mootanah R; Ingle P; Dowell J; Cheah K; Shelton JC
    Technol Health Care; 2000; 8(6):343-55. PubMed ID: 11258580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fit of the uncemented femoral component and the use of cement influence the strain transfer the femoral cortex.
    Jasty M; O'Connor DO; Henshaw RM; Harrigan TP; Harris WH
    J Orthop Res; 1994 Sep; 12(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 7931781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
    Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Anatomic basis of the cemented femur shaft. A comparative study of straight and anatomic design].
    Breusch SJ; Draenert Y; Draenert K
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1998; 136(6):554-9. PubMed ID: 10036745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stable partial debonding of the cement interfaces indicated by a finite element model of a total hip prosthesis.
    Lu Z; Ebramzadeh E; McKellop H; Sarmiento A
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Mar; 14(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 8648501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A cement fixation system for total hip arthroplasty.
    Oh I; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1982 Apr; (164):221-9. PubMed ID: 7067290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cement-within-cement revision hip arthroplasty; should it be done?
    Li PL; Ingle PJ; Dowell JK
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1996 Sep; 78(5):809-11. PubMed ID: 8836076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Surgical exposure and cement removal in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Mallory TH
    Semin Arthroplasty; 1992 Oct; 3(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 10147935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Femoral cement removal in revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical analysis.
    Ferguson GM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Sep; (234):307-8. PubMed ID: 3409590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reduction in cement-bone interface shear strength between primary and revision arthroplasty.
    Dohmae Y; Bechtold JE; Sherman RE; Puno RM; Gustilo RB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Nov; (236):214-20. PubMed ID: 3180573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Personal experience with the Wagner revision stem in hip joint reoperations].
    Cech O; StehlĂ­k J; Krbec M; Vrecion V
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(3):148-61. PubMed ID: 11706537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.