142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3594984)
41. Calcium phosphate cement augmentation of the femoral neck defect created after dynamic hip screw removal.
Strauss EJ; Pahk B; Kummer FJ; Egol K
J Orthop Trauma; 2007 May; 21(5):295-300. PubMed ID: 17485993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The femoral stent. Surgical technique for a new method of cementing the femoral component in the presence of a large cortical defect.
Freiberg AA; Harris WH
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 1995 Jun; 24(6):501-3. PubMed ID: 7670875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Factors affecting cement strains near the tip of a cemented femoral component.
Estok DM; Orr TE; Harris WH
J Arthroplasty; 1997 Jan; 12(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 9021500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Reducing the risk of bone cement implantation syndrome during femoral arthroplasty.
Rothberg DL; Kubiak EN; Peters CL; Randall RL; Aoki SK
Orthopedics; 2013 Apr; 36(4):e463-7. PubMed ID: 23590786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Revision arthroplasty facilitated by ultrasonic tool cement removal. Part II: Histologic analysis of endosteal bone after cement removal.
Caillouette JT; Gorab RS; Klapper RC; Anzel SH
Orthop Rev; 1991 May; 20(5):435-40. PubMed ID: 2067878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Revision arthroplasty facilitated by ultrasonic tool cement removal. Part I: In vitro evaluation.
Caillouette JT; Gorab RS; Klapper RC; Anzel SH
Orthop Rev; 1991 Apr; 20(4):353-7. PubMed ID: 2041658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Longitudinal crack propagation in bone around femoral prosthesis.
Incavo SJ; DiFazio F; Wilder D; Howe JG; Pope M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Nov; (272):175-80. PubMed ID: 1934730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Total hip revision arthroplasty. Prosthesis and cement removal techniques.
Gray FB
Orthop Clin North Am; 1992 Apr; 23(2):313-9. PubMed ID: 1570143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Evaluation of femoral strains with cementless proximal-fill femoral implants of varied stem length.
Arno S; Fetto J; Nguyen NQ; Kinariwala N; Takemoto R; Oh C; Walker PS
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Aug; 27(7):680-5. PubMed ID: 22503474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Segmental cement extraction at revision total hip arthroplasty.
Schurman DJ; Maloney WJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Dec; (285):158-63. PubMed ID: 1446433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Effect of shock waves on the strength of connection between bone and polymethylmethacrylate. An in vitro study of human femur segments].
Braun W; Claes L; Rüter A; Paschke D
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1992; 130(3):236-43. PubMed ID: 1642041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. In vitro measurement of bone-acrylic interface pressure during femoral component insertion.
Markolf KL; Amstutz HC
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1976; (121):60-6. PubMed ID: 991520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Prothesis cement envelope in femoral component total hips.
Savino AW; Andersson GB; Andriacchi TP; Galante JO
Surg Forum; 1978; 29():556-7. PubMed ID: 401259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Changes in femoral cortical porosity after reaming and intramedullary canal preparation in a canine model.
Syed KA; Kuzyk PR; Yoo DJ; Zdero R; Richards RR; Schemitsch EH
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Feb; 28(2):368-73. PubMed ID: 22552219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Revision surgery for failed, nonseptic total hip arthroplasty: the femoral side.
Harris WH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1982 Oct; (170):8-20. PubMed ID: 7127968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Ultrasonic technology in revision joint arthroplasty.
Klapper RC; Caillouette JT; Callaghan JJ; Hozack WJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Dec; (285):147-54. PubMed ID: 1446431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Femoral cement extraction in revision total hip arthroplasty--an in vitro study comparing computer-assisted freehand-navigated cement removal to conventional cement extraction.
Mumme T; Friedrich MJ; Rode H; Gravius S; Andereya S; Müller-Rath R; de la Fuente M
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2015 Dec; 60(6):567-75. PubMed ID: 26053005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Risk of periprosthetic femur fracture after anterior cortical bone windowing: a mechanical analysis of short versus long cemented stems in pigs.
Wilson LJ; Richards CJ; Irvine D; Tillie A; Crawford RW
Acta Orthop; 2011 Dec; 82(6):674-8. PubMed ID: 22066561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Cement-in-cement revision for selected Vancouver Type B1 femoral periprosthetic fractures: a biomechanical analysis.
Brew CJ; Wilson LJ; Whitehouse SL; Hubble MJ; Crawford RW
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Mar; 28(3):521-5. PubMed ID: 23146585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Design and In Vitro Validation of an Orthopaedic Drill Guide for Femoral Stem Revision in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Klok JW; Groenewegen J; Temmerman O; Van Straten N; Van Straten B; Dankelman J; Horeman T
IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med; 2024; 12():340-347. PubMed ID: 38606389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
