These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3594984)

  • 61. In vitro stability of cemented and cementless femoral stems with compaction.
    Chareancholvanich K; Bourgeault CA; Schmidt AH; Gustilo RB; Lew WD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2002 Jan; (394):290-302. PubMed ID: 11795746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Alterations in bone remodeling in the femur after medullary reaming and cemented hip arthroplasty in dogs.
    VanEnkevort BA; Markel MD; Manley PA
    Am J Vet Res; 1999 Aug; 60(8):922-8. PubMed ID: 10451197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Tips of the trade #29. Femoral windows for easy cement removal in hip revision surgery.
    Cameron HU
    Orthop Rev; 1990 Oct; 19(10):909-10, 912. PubMed ID: 2250996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Experimental reaming of the proximal femur and acrylic cement implantation: vascular and histologic effects.
    Rhinelander FW; Nelson CL; Stewart RD; Stewart CL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1979 Jun; (141):74-89. PubMed ID: 383344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Biomechanics of the femoral component of total hip prostheses with particular reference to the stress in the bone-cement.
    Yettram AL; Wright KW
    J Biomed Eng; 1979 Oct; 1(4):281-5. PubMed ID: 537354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Revision arthroplasty facilitated by ultrasonic tool cement removal. An evaluation of whole bone strength in a canine model.
    Callaghan JJ; Elder SH; Stranne SK; Fulghum CF; Seaber AV; Myers BS
    J Arthroplasty; 1992 Dec; 7(4):495-500. PubMed ID: 1479368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The cement-bone bond is weaker than cement-cement bond in cement-in-cement revision arthroplasty. A comparative biomechanical study.
    Ceynowa M; Zerdzicki K; Klosowski P; Zrodowski M; Pankowski R; Roclawski M; Mazurek T
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0246740. PubMed ID: 33571251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Biomechanical considerations on some postoperative problems of directly anchored total hip replacements.
    Heimke G; Stock D; Büsing CM; von Mallinckrodt D
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1989 Jul; 23(7):679-84. PubMed ID: 2738082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. [New instruments for the removal of an artificial hip joint from the shaft].
    Brinckmann P; Horst M
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1985; 123(1):113-4. PubMed ID: 3984460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Experimental investigation of bone remodelling using composite femurs.
    Waide V; Cristofolini L; Stolk J; Verdonschot N; Toni A
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2003 Jul; 18(6):523-36. PubMed ID: 12828902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. A device for removal of femoral distal cement plug during hip revision arthroplasty: a high-powered drill equipped with a centralizer.
    Jingushi S; Noguchi Y; Shuto T; Nakashima T; Iwamoto Y
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Feb; 15(2):231-3. PubMed ID: 10708092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Roentgenographic and mechanical performance of centrifuged cement in a simulated total hip arthroplasty model.
    Chao EY; Chin HC; Stauffer RN
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Dec; (285):91-101. PubMed ID: 1446460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Femoral Iatrogenic Subtrochanteric Fatigue Fracture Risk is not Increased by Placing Drill Holes Below the Level of the Lesser Trochanter.
    Tsai AG; Ashworth TJ; Marcus R; Akkus O
    Iowa Orthop J; 2017; 37():23-28. PubMed ID: 28852330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Novel methods to study functional loading micromechanics at the stem-cement and cement-bone interface in cemented femoral hip replacements.
    Race A; Miller MA; Mann KA
    J Biomech; 2010 Mar; 43(4):788-91. PubMed ID: 19906377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. The use of a collar and precoating on cemented femoral stems is unnecessary and detrimental.
    Ling RS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Dec; (285):73-83. PubMed ID: 1446458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Minimal femoral cortical thickness necessary to prevent perforation by ultrasonic tools in joint revision surgery.
    Brooks AT; Nelson CL; Hofmann OE
    J Arthroplasty; 1995 Jun; 10(3):359-62. PubMed ID: 7673915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Polymethylmethacrylate removal from the femur using a crescentic window technique.
    Buehler KO; Walker RH
    Orthopedics; 1998 Jun; 21(6):697-700. PubMed ID: 9642708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. A new power tool for removal of methylmethacrylate from the femur.
    Harris WH; Oh I
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1978 May; (132):53-4. PubMed ID: 679552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. [Ultrasonic technique for removing bone cement in total hip revision arthroplasty].
    Blacha J; Kozak J; Bednarek A
    Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 1995; 60(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 7671727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The mechanical effects of femoral shaft perforation at total hip replacement.
    Doyle J; Proctor P; Bessel T; Moloney MA
    Int Orthop; 1989; 13(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 2722318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.