BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3594986)

  • 1. Curvature of the femur and the proximal entry point for an intramedullary rod.
    Harper MC; Carson WL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1987 Jul; (220):155-61. PubMed ID: 3594986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mismatch of current intramedullary nails with the anterior bow of the femur.
    Egol KA; Chang EY; Cvitkovic J; Kummer FJ; Koval KJ
    J Orthop Trauma; 2004 Aug; 18(7):410-5. PubMed ID: 15289685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retrograde femoral nailing: an understanding of the intercondylar insertion site.
    Morgan SJ; Hurley D; Agudelo JF; Meyers T; Lyons R; Parekh A; Smith WR
    J Trauma; 2008 Jan; 64(1):151-4. PubMed ID: 18188114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer-assisted three-dimensional correlation between the femoral neck-shaft angle and the optimal entry point for antegrade nailing.
    Anastopoulos G; Chissas D; Dourountakis J; Ntagiopoulos PG; Magnisalis E; Asimakopoulos A; Xenakis TA
    Injury; 2010 Mar; 41(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 20176170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of piriformis versus trochanteric starting point on fixation stability of short intramedullary reconstruction nails.
    Su ET; DeWal H; Sanders R; Kummer FJ; Mujtaba M; Koval KJ
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis; 2001-2002; 60(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 12003356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional computed tomography-based modeling of sagittal cadaveric femoral bowing and implications for intramedullary nailing.
    Buford WL; Turnbow BJ; Gugala Z; Lindsey RW
    J Orthop Trauma; 2014 Jan; 28(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 24121983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Femoral nailing through the trochanter: the reamer pathway indicates a helical nail shape.
    Ehmke LW; Polzin BM; Madey SM; Bottlang M
    J Orthop Trauma; 2006; 20(10):668-74. PubMed ID: 17106376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of implant overlap on the mechanical properties of the femur.
    Harris T; Ruth JT; Szivek J; Haywood B
    J Trauma; 2003 May; 54(5):930-5. PubMed ID: 12777906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional morphologic features of Asian atypical femur and clinical implications of cephalomedullary nail fixation: Computational measurement at actual size.
    Lee KJ; Kim BS; Kim KT; Jung GH
    Injury; 2022 Dec; 53(12):4090-4098. PubMed ID: 36207153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Finite element analysis of a femoral retrograde intramedullary nail subject to gait loading.
    Cheung G; Zalzal P; Bhandari M; Spelt JK; Papini M
    Med Eng Phys; 2004 Mar; 26(2):93-108. PubMed ID: 15036177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Geometric analysis of potential error in using femoral intramedullary guides in total knee arthroplasty.
    Novotny J; Gonzalez MH; Amirouche FM; Li YC
    J Arthroplasty; 2001 Aug; 16(5):641-7. PubMed ID: 11503125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical study of flexible intramedullary nails.
    Johnson CW; Carmichael KD; Morris RP; Gilmer B
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2009; 29(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 19098645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical analysis of titanium elastic nail fixation in a pediatric femur fracture model.
    Li Y; Stabile KJ; Shilt JS
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2008 Dec; 28(8):874-8. PubMed ID: 19034181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance evaluation of a cement-augmented intramedullary fixation system for pathologic lesions of the femoral shaft.
    Miller GJ; Vander Griend RA; Blake WP; Springfield DS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1987 Aug; (221):246-54. PubMed ID: 3608306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The biomechanical study of rotating-arm self-locking intramedullary nails in comminuted femoral shaft fractures].
    Fang Y; Fu X; Chi L; Wang G; Yang T
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Oct; 23(5):1041-4. PubMed ID: 17121350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Proper entry point for femoral intramedullary guide in total knee arthroplasty.
    Wangroongsub Y; Cherdtaweesup S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S1-5. PubMed ID: 20128068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The comparison of femoral curves and curves of contemporary intramedullary nails.
    Harma A; Germen B; Karakas HM; Elmali N; Inan M
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2005 Dec; 27(6):502-6. PubMed ID: 16132196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Antegrade femoral nailing: an anatomical determination of the correct entry point.
    Gausepohl T; Pennig D; Koebke J; Harnoss S
    Injury; 2002 Oct; 33(8):701-5. PubMed ID: 12213421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correct anatomical location of entry point for antegrade femoral nailing.
    Kale SP; Patil N; Pilankar S; Karkhanis AR; Bagaria V
    Injury; 2006 Oct; 37(10):990-3. PubMed ID: 16934257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The proximal femur--a second look at rational of implant design.
    Mishra AK; Chalise P; Singh RP; Shah RK
    Nepal Med Coll J; 2009 Dec; 11(4):278-80. PubMed ID: 20635610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.