BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35950348)

  • 1. The value of 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in patients with prostate cancer and inconclusive standard imaging at primary staging.
    Nalliah S; Zacho HD
    Nucl Med Commun; 2022 Oct; 43(10):1092-1098. PubMed ID: 35950348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
    Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How accurate is
    Erdem S; Simsek DH; Degirmenci E; Aydin R; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
    Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bone scintigraphy as a gatekeeper for the detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: comparison with Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT.
    Caglar M; Tuncel M; Yildiz E; Karabulut E
    Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Dec; 34(12):932-941. PubMed ID: 32975741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical impact of PSMA PET/CT in primary prostate cancer compared to conventional nodal and distant staging: a retrospective single center study.
    Donswijk ML; van Leeuwen PJ; Vegt E; Cheung Z; Heijmink SWTPJ; van der Poel HG; Stokkel MPM
    BMC Cancer; 2020 Aug; 20(1):723. PubMed ID: 32758168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Prospective Comparison of
    Anttinen M; Ettala O; Malaspina S; Jambor I; Sandell M; Kajander S; Rinta-Kiikka I; Schildt J; Saukko E; Rautio P; Timonen KL; Matikainen T; Noponen T; Saunavaara J; Löyttyniemi E; Taimen P; Kemppainen J; Dean PB; Blanco Sequeiros R; Aronen HJ; Seppänen M; Boström PJ
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):635-644. PubMed ID: 32675047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incremental Impact of [
    Szigeti F; Schweighofer-Zwink G; Meissnitzer M; Hauser-Kronberger C; Hitzl W; Kunit T; Forstner R; Pirich C; Beheshti M
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2022 Feb; 24(1):50-59. PubMed ID: 34519966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Head-To-Head Comparison of
    Zhao G; Ji B
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Sep; 219(3):386-395. PubMed ID: 35441529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does bone scintigraphy still have a role in the era of 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT in prostate cancer?
    Simsek DH; Sanli Y; Civan C; Engin MN; Isik EG; Ozkan ZG; Kuyumcu S
    Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Jul; 34(7):476-485. PubMed ID: 32394269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The clinical consequences of routine
    Zacho HD; Nalliah S; Petersen A; Petersen LJ
    Scand J Urol; 2022; 56(5-6):353-358. PubMed ID: 36073096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ga-PSMA PET/CT Staging of Newly Diagnosed Intermediate- and High-Risk Prostate Cancer.
    Kuten J; Mabjeesh NJ; Lerman H; Levine C; Barnes S; Even-Sapir E
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2019 Feb; 21(2):100-104. PubMed ID: 30772960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12.
    Lengana T; Lawal IO; Boshomane TG; Popoola GO; Mokoala KMG; Moshokoa E; Maes A; Mokgoro NP; Van de Wiele C; Vorster M; Sathekge MM
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Oct; 16(5):392-401. PubMed ID: 30120038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13.
    von Eyben FE; Picchio M; von Eyben R; Rhee H; Bauman G
    Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):686-693. PubMed ID: 28753806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Potential Impact of
    Calais J; Kishan AU; Cao M; Fendler WP; Eiber M; Herrmann K; Ceci F; Reiter RE; Rettig MB; Hegde JV; Shaverdian N; King CR; Steinberg ML; Czernin J; Nickols NG
    J Nucl Med; 2018 Nov; 59(11):1714-1721. PubMed ID: 29653978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of hybrid
    Janssen JC; Meißner S; Woythal N; Prasad V; Brenner W; Diederichs G; Hamm B; Makowski MR
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):610-619. PubMed ID: 28779400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of bone scintigraphy and
    Pyka T; Okamoto S; Dahlbender M; Tauber R; Retz M; Heck M; Tamaki N; Schwaiger M; Maurer T; Eiber M
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Nov; 43(12):2114-2121. PubMed ID: 27290607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A prospective randomized multicentre study of the impact of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT imaging for staging high-risk prostate cancer prior to curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA study): clinical trial protocol.
    Hofman MS; Murphy DG; Williams SG; Nzenza T; Herschtal A; Lourenco RA; Bailey DL; Budd R; Hicks RJ; Francis RJ; Lawrentschuk N
    BJU Int; 2018 Nov; 122(5):783-793. PubMed ID: 29726071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [
    Hirmas N; Al-Ibraheem A; Herrmann K; Alsharif A; Muhsin H; Khader J; Al-Daghmin A; Salah S
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2019 Jun; 21(3):574-581. PubMed ID: 30215174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Compared with Conventional Imaging for Initial Staging of Treatment-naïve Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Single-center Study.
    Lenis AT; Pooli A; Lec PM; Sadun TY; Johnson DC; Lebacle C; Fendler WP; Eiber M; Czernin J; Reiter RE; Calais J
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 5(5):544-552. PubMed ID: 32958451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Primary lymph-node staging with
    Corona-Montes VE; González-Cuenca E; Fernández-Noyola G; Olarte-Casas MA; Bobadilla-Salazar D; Medrano-Urtecho HM; Asimakopoulos AD
    Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 39(8):494.e1-494.e6. PubMed ID: 33223371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.